Preventing NEETs during the Great Recession: the effects of mandatory activation programs for young welfare recipients

Abadie A, Athey S, Imbens G, Wooldridge J (2017) When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? NBER working paper no. 24003, Cambridge Angrist J, Pischke J (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton Barreca AI, Guldi M, Lindo JM, Waddell GR (2011) Saving babies? Revisiting the effect of very low birth weight classification. Q J Econ 126(4):2117–2123 Barreca AI, Lindo JM, Waddell GR (2016) Heaping-induced bias in regression-discontinuity designs. Econ Inq 54(1):268–293 Bell D, Blanchflower D (2011) Young people and the Great Recession. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 27(2):241–267 Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119(1):249–275 Blundell R, Dias MC, Meghir C, Reenen J (2004) Evaluating the employment impact of a mandatory job search program. J Eur Econ Assoc 2(4):569–606 Board of Amsterdam (2009) Vaststellen verordening tot wijziging van de toeslagenverordening, handhavingsverordening, afstemmingsverordening WWB, verordening clientenparticipatie DWI 2006 en re-integratieverordening i.v.m. de invoering van de Wet investeren in jongeren Bolhaar J, Ketel N, Van der Klaauw B (2019) Job-search periods for welfare applicants: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ J Econ Policy 11(1):92–125 Cammeraat E, Jongen E, Koning P (2017) Preventing NEETs during the great recession—the effects of mandatory activation programs for young welfare recipients. IZA discussion paper No. 11090, Bonn Carcillo S, Fernández R, Königs S (2015) NEET youth in the aftermath of the crisis: challenges and policies. OECD social, employment and migration working papers no. 164, OECD, Paris Card D, Kluve J, Weber A (2017) What works? A meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations. J Eur Econ Assoc 16(3):894–931 Dahlberg M, Johansson K, Mörk E (2009) On mandatory activation of welfare recipients. IZA discussion paper no. 3947, Bonn Donald S, Lang K (2007) Inference with difference-in-differences and other panel data. Rev Econ Stat 89(2):221–233 Gautier P, Muller P, Van der Klaauw B, Roshlom M, Svarer M (2018) Estimating equilibrium effects of job search assistance. J Labor Econ 36(4):1073–1125 Hernæs Ø, Markussen S, Roed K (2017) Can welfare conditionality combat high school dropout? Labour Econ 48:144–156 Imbens G, Wooldridge J (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47:5–85 Kluve J, Puerto S, Robalino DA, Romero JM, Rother F, Stöterau J, Weidenkaff F, Witte M (2016) Do youth employment programs improve labor market outcomes? A systematic review. Ruhr economic papers no. 648, Essen Leenheer J, Adriaens H, Mulder J (2011) Evaluatie wet investeren in Jongeren. Centerdata Tilburg, Tilburg Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment (2008) Bevordering duurzame arbeidsinschakeling jongeren tot 27 jaar (Wet investeren in jongeren). Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment, The Hague OECD (2016a) Education at a glance. OECD, Paris OECD (2016b) Labour force statistics. OECD, Paris OECD (2016c) Youth not in employment, education or training (indicator). OECD, Paris Persson A, Vikman U (2014) The effects of mandatory activation on welfare entry and exit rates. In: Carcillo S (ed) Research in labor economics, vol 39. Emerald, Chennai, pp 189–217 Statistics Netherlands (2015) Documentatierapport Arbeidsmarktpanel 1999–2013. Statistics Netherlands, Den Haag UWV (2014) Na de WW in de bijstand. UWV, Amsterdam