Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adeleye, O. A., & Adebamowo, C. A. (2012). Factors associated with research wrongdoing in Nigeria. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(5), 15–24.
Agnoli, F., Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Albiero, P., & Cubelli, R. (2017). Questionable research practices among Italian research psychologists. PLoS ONE, 12(3), 0172792.
All European Academies. (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity revised edition. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct. Accessed 4 April 2021.
Allen, G. N., Ball, N. L., & Smith, H. J. (2011). Information systems research behaviors: What are the normative standards? Mis Quarterly, 35(3), 533–551.
Awasthi, S., & Ranjan, S. (2019). Perception and attitude towards data cooking: A perspective of LIS research scholars. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2872.
Banks, G. C., O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., Pollack, J. M., White, C. D., Batchelor, J. H., Whelpley, C. E., et al. (2016). Questions about questionable research practices in the field of management: A guest commentary. Journal of Management, 42(1), 5–20.
Bebeau, M. J., & Davis, E. L. (1996). Survey of ethical issues in dental research. Journal of Dental Research, 75(2), 845–855.
Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., & Miller, A. N. (2010). Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(4), 715–725.
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088–1101.
Braun, M., & Roussos, A. J. (2012). Psychotherapy researchers: Reported misbehaviors and opinions. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(5), 25–29.
Bruton, S. V., Brown, M., & Sacco, D. F. (2020). Ethical consistency and experience: An attempt to influence researcher attitudes toward questionable research practices through reading prompts. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(3), 216–226.
Burgess, G. L., & Mullen, D. (2002). Observations of ethical misconduct among industrial hygienists in England. AIHA Journal, 63(2), 151–155.
Dhingra, D., & Mishra, D. (2014). Publication misconduct among medical professionals in India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 11(2), 104–107.
Dotterweich, D. P., & Garrison, S. (1998). Research ethics of business academic researchers at AACSB institutions. Teaching Business Ethics, 1(4), 431–447.
Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E., & Ordway, S. (1996). Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2(1), 89–114.
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634.
Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE, 4(5), e5738.
Fiedler, K., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Questionable research practices revisited. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 45–52.
Fraser, H., Parker, T., Nakagawa, S., Barnett, A., & Fidler, F. (2018). Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0200303.
Gardner, W., Lidz, C. W., & Hartwig, K. C. (2005). Authors’ reports about research integrity problems in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 26(2), 244–251.
Geggie, D. (2001). A survey of newly appointed consultants’ attitudes towards research fraud. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(5), 344–346.
Glick, J. L. (1993). Perceptions concerning research integrity and the practice of data audit in the biotechnology industry. Accountability in Research, 3(2–3), 187–195.
Glick, L. J., & Shamoo, A. E. (1994). Results of a survey on research practices, completed by attendees at the third conference on research policies and quality assurance. Accountability in Research, 3, 275–280.
Godecharle, S., Fieuws, S., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2017). Scientists still behaving badly? A survey within industry and universities. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(6), 1697–1717.
Greenberg, M., & Goldberg, L. (1994). Ethical challenges to risk scientists: An exploratory analysis of survey data. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 19(2), 223–241.
Henry, D. A., Hill, S. R., Doran, E., Newby, D. A., Henderson, K. M., Maguire, J., et al. (2005). Medical specialists and pharmaceutical industry-sponsored research: A survey of the Australian experience. Medical Journal of Australia, 182(11), 557–560.
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560.
Hofmann, B., Helgesson, G., Juth, N., & Holm, S. (2015). Scientific dishonesty: A survey of doctoral students at the major medical faculties in Sweden and Norway. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 10(4), 380–388.
Hofmann, B., Jensen, L. B., Eriksen, M. B., Helgesson, G., Juth, N., & Holm, S. (2020). Research integrity among PhD students at the faculty of medicine: A comparison of three Scandinavian universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 15(4), 1–10.
Hofmann, B., Myhr, A. I., & Holm, S. (2013). Scientific dishonesty—a nationwide survey of doctoral students in Norway. BMC Medical Ethics, 14(1), 3.
Holm, S., & Hofmann, B. (2018). Associations between attitudes towards scientific misconduct and self-reported behavior. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 25(5), 290–300.
Jensen, L. B., Kyvik, K. O., Leth-Larsen, R., & Eriksen, M. B. (2018). Research integrity among PhD students within clinical research at the University of Southern Denmark. Danish Medical Journal, 65(4), 1–5.
John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.
Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1992). A pilot study of biomedical trainees' perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine, 67(11), 769–775.
Kattenbraker, M. S. (2007). Health education research and publication: Ethical considerations and the response of health educators. PhD thesis, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois, United States.
Koklu, N. (2003). Views of academicians on research ethics. Journal of Educational Sciences & Practices, 2(4), 138–151.
Lensvelt-Mulders, G. J. L. M., Hox, J. J., van der Heijden, P. G. M., & Maas, C. J. M. (2005). Meta-analysis of randomized response research: Thirty-five years of validation. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(3), 319–348.
Lock, S. (1988). Misconduct in medical research: Does it exist in Britain? British Medical Journal, 297, 1531–1535.
Long, T. C., Errami, M., George, A. C., Sun, Z., & Garner, H. R. (2009). Scientific integrity: Responding to possible plagiarism. Science, 323(5919), 1293–1294.
Lindsay, D. S. (2015). Replication in psychological science. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1827–1832.
List, J. A., Bailey, C. D., Euzent, P. J., & Martin, T. L. (2001). Academic economists behaving badly? A survey on three areas of unethical behavior. Economic Inquiry, 39(1), 162–170.
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435(7043), 737–738.
May, C., Campbell, S., & Doyle, H. (1998). Research misconduct: A pilot study of British addiction researchers. Addiction Research, 6(4), 371–373.
Meyer, M. J., & McMahon, D. (2004). An examination of ethical research conduct by experienced and novice accounting academics. Issues in Accounting Education, 19(4), 413–442.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
NAS-NAE-IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). (1992). Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process. National Academy Press.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Fostering integrity in research. The National Academies Press.
Nilstun, T., Löfmark, R., & Lundqvist, A. (2010). Scientific dishonesty—questionnaire to doctoral students in Sweden. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36(5), 315–318.
Office of the President. (2000). Federal research misconduct policy. https://ori.hhs.gov/federal-research-misconduct-policy. Accessed 4 April 2021.
Okonta, P. I., & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics, 13(3), 149–157.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.
Ozturk, N., Armato, S. G., Giger, M. L., Serago, C. F., & Ross, L. F. (2013). Ethics and professionalism in medical physics: A survey of AAPM members. Medical Physics, 40(4), 047001.
Pupovac, V., & Fanelli, D. (2015). Scientists admitting to plagiarism: A meta-analysis of surveys. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(5), 1331–1352.
Pupovac, V., Prijić-Samaržija, S., & Petrovečki, M. (2016). Research misconduct in the Croatian scientific community: A survey assessing the forms and characteristics of research misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(1), 165–181.
Rabelo, A., Farias, J., Sarmet, M., Joaquim, T., Hoersting, R., Victorino, L., et al. (2019). Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 55(4), 674–683.
Rankin, M., & Esteves, M. D. (1997). Perceptions of scientific misconduct in nursing. Nursing Research, 46(5), 270–276.
Ranstam, J., Buyse, M., George, S. L., Evans, S., Geller, N. L., Scherrer, B., et al. (2000). Fraud in medical research: An international survey of biostatisticians. Controlled Clinical Trials, 21(5), 415–427.
Rohwer, A., Young, T., Wager, E., & Garner, P. (2017). Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers. British Medical Journal Open, 7, e018467.
Saberi-Karimian, M., Afshari, R., Movahhed, S., AmiriKeykhaee, F. F., Mohajer, F., et al. (2018). Different aspects of scientific misconduct among Iranian academic members. European Science Editing, 44(2), 28–31.
Simmons, R. L., Polk, J., Williams, B., & Mavroudis, C. (1991). Misconduct and fraud in research: Social and legislative issues symposium of the Society of University Surgeons. Surgery, 110, 1–7.
Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74.
Steneck, N. H. (2007). Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. US Government Printing Office.
Swazey, J. P., Anderson, M. S., Lewis, K. S., & Louis, S. S. (1993). Ethical problems in academic research. American Scientist, 81(6), 542–553.
Tangney, J. P. (1987). Fraud will out-or will it? New Scientist, 115(1572), 62–63.
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883.
Tijdink, J. K., Bouter, L. M., Veldkamp, C. L., van de Ven, P. M., Wicherts, J. M., & Smulders et al. (2016). Personality traits are associated with research misbehavior in Dutch scientists: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 11(9), e0163251.
Titus, S. L., Wells, J. A., & Rhoades, L. J. (2008). Repairing research integrity. Nature, 453(7198), 980–982.
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
VSNU. (2018). Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity. https://www.wur.nl/en/show/Netherlands-Code-of-Conduct-for-Research-Integrity-1.htm. Accessed 4 April 2021.