Prevalence of ‘Food Addiction' as Measured with the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 in a Representative German Sample and Its Association with Sex, Age and Weight Categories

Obesity Facts - Tập 10 Số 1 - Trang 12-24 - 2017
Carolin Hauck1, Annegret Weiß1, Erica M. Schulte2, Adrian Meule3, Thomas Ellrott1
1Institute for Nutrition and Psychology, University Medicine Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
2Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
3Department of Psychology, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Tóm tắt

<b><i>Background/Aims: </i></b>To assess the prevalence and correlates of addictive-like eating behavior in Germany. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The German version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) 2.0 was used to investigate, for the first time, the prevalence of ‘food addiction' in a representative sample aged 18-65 years (N <i>= </i>1,034). <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prevalence of ‘food addiction' measured by the YFAS 2.0 was 7.9%. Individuals meeting criteria for ‘food addiction' had higher BMI and were younger than individuals not meeting the threshold. Underweight (15.0%) and obese (17.2%) individuals exhibited the highest prevalence rate of ‘food addiction'. Addictive-like eating was not associated with sex, education level, or place of residence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> YFAS 2.0 ‘food addiction' was met by nearly 8% of the population. There is a non-linear relationship between addictive-like eating and BMI, with the highest prevalence among underweight and obese persons. These findings suggest that ‘food addiction' may be a contributor to overeating but may also reflect a distinct phenotype of problematic eating behavior not synonymous with obesity. Further, the elevated prevalence of YFAS 2.0 ‘food addiction' among underweight individuals may reflect an overlap with eating disorders and warrants attention in future research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s00103-012-1656-3

10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00128.x

10.1002/eat.10140

10.1126/science.280.5368.1367

10.1007/s00261-012-9862-x

10.1038/oby.2004.282

10.2174/1874473711104030140

10.1371/journal.pone.0117959

10.1111/j.1467-789X.2012.01046.x

10.1016/j.abrep.2015.05.007

10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.08.026

10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.017

10.1038/nrn3212-c1

10.3390/nu6093653

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019

10.1038/nn.2519

10.1002/eat.20808

10.1016/j.exger.2013.03.006

10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.008

10.1097/ADM.0b013e31819aa621

10.1097/ADM.0b013e318193c993

10.1007/s40429-014-0021-z

10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003

10.1037/adb0000136

10.3390/nu6104552

10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.12.009

10.1002/erv.2311

10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.008

10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.007

10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.32

10.1016/j.cpr.2016.02.001

10.3945/ajcn.111.027003

10.1016/j.appet.2013.10.008

10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.007

10.1016/j.appet.2016.10.003

10.1371/journal.pone.0147557

10.1016/j.appet.2008.12.003

10.1038/oby.2007.99

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.11.007

10.1037/a0026463

10.1038/sj.ijo.0800871

10.1038/nn1579

10.1016/j.appet.2011.03.001

10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.010

10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.01.008

10.1111/j.1360-0443.1987.tb01430.x

10.15288/jsad.2010.71.674

10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.07.005

10.1002/erv.2306

10.1026/0012-1924/a000047

10.1007/s00115-013-3961-y