Prevalence for evidence-based doping regulation—A lawyer’s perspective

Performance Enhancement and Health - Tập 8 - Trang 100167 - 2020
Marjolaine Viret1,2
1PMA Pedrazzini Martin-Achard Avocats, 11 rue de Candolle, 1205 Geneva
2University of Lausanne , Switzerland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aitken, 2010 Aubel, 2014, An alternative approach to the prevention of doping in cycling, International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 1094, 10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.08.010 Backhouse, 2015 Biedermann, 2019, The decisional nature of probability and plausibility assessments in juridical evidence and proof, International Commentary on Evidence, 16, 1 De Hon, 2015, Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: A review of numbers and methods, Sports Medicine, 45, 57, 10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x Elbe, 2018, Doping prevalence among Danish elite athletes, Performance Enhancement & Health, 6, 28, 10.1016/j.peh.2018.01.001 Faiss, 2019 Hopker, 2018, Athlete performance monitoring in anti-doping, Frontiers in Physiology, 9, 232, 10.3389/fphys.2018.00232 Iljukov, 2017, Performance profiling – Perspectives for anti-doping and beyond, Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 1102, 10.3389/fphys.2017.01102 Koehler, 2002, When do courts think base rate statistics are relevant?, Jurimetrics Journal, 42, 373 Lentillon-Kaestner, 2011, Can we measure accurately the prevalence of doping?, Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01199.x Marclay, 2017, Integration of the forensic dimension into anti-doping strategies, vol. 62, 129 Marclay, 2013, Perspectives for Forensic Intelligence in anti-doping: Thinking outside of the box, Forensic Science International, 229, 133, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.04.009 Menaspa, 2017, Considerations on the assessment and use of cycling performance metrics and their integration in the athlete’s biological passport, Frontiers in Physiology, 8, 912, 10.3389/fphys.2017.00912 Parkhurst, 2017 Pielke, 2018, Assessing doping prevalence is possible. So what are we waiting for?, Sports Medicine, 48, 207, 10.1007/s40279-017-0792-1 Pielke, 2016 Pielke, 2019, Scientific integrity & anti-doping regulation, International Journal of Sports Policy & Politics, 10.1080/19406940.2019.1596968 Pitsch, 2019, Assessing and explaining the doping prevalence in cycling, 13 Pitsch, 2011, The frequency of doping in elite sport—Results of a replication study, International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 47, 557 Pitsch, 2007, Doping in elite sports in Germany: Results of a www survey, European Journal for Sport and Society, 4, 89, 10.1080/16138171.2007.11687797 Pluim, 2013, A doping sinner is not always a cheat, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 42, 549 Rigozzi, 2019 Rigozzi, 2013 Sottas, 2008, A forensic approach to the interpretation of blood doping markers, Law Probability and Risk, 7, 191, 10.1093/lpr/mgm042 Sottas, 2011, Prevalence of blood doping in samples collected from elite track and field athletes, Clinical Chemistry, 57, 762, 10.1373/clinchem.2010.156067 Thompson, 2013, The role of prior probability in forensic assessments, Frontiers in Genetics, 4, 1, 10.3389/fgene.2013.00220 Ulrich, 2018, Doping in two elite athletics competitions assessed by randomized-response surveys, Sports Medicine, 48, 211, 10.1007/s40279-017-0765-4 Viret, 2020, Using interdisciplinary tools to improve anti-doping: Utopia or necessity?, The International Sports Law Journal, 20, 82, 10.1007/s40318-019-00161-8 Viret, 2019, Doping relevance and the world anti-doping code, 234 Viret, 2016