Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Atlas, J.D., and S.C. Levinson. 1981.It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: Radical pragmatics (rev. standard version). In Radical pragmatics, ed. P. Cole, 1–61. New York: Academic Press.
Bard E., Robertson D., Sorace A. (1996) Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72(1): 32–68
Beaver, D.I. 1994. When variables don’t vary enough. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 4, ed. M. Harvey and L. Santelmann, 35–60. Cornell: CLC Publications.
Beaver D.I. (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford
Bott L., Noveck I.A. (2004) Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3): 437–457
Breheny R., Katsos N., Williams J. (2005) Are generalised scalar implicatures generated by default? An on-line investigation into the role of context in generating pragmatic inferences. Cognition 20: 1–30
Charlow, S. 2008. Strong ‘‘predicative’’ presuppositions. Ms., NYU.
Chemla, E. 2008. Projecting presuppositions with scalar implicatures. In Proceedings of SuB 12, ed. A. Grønn, 81–91. Oslo: Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo.
Chemla, E. 2009a. An anti-introduction to presupposition. In Presuppositions and implicatures, ed. P. É gré and G. Magri. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (in press).
Chemla, E. 2009b. An experimental approach to adverbial modification. In Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory, ed. U. Sauerland and K. Yatsushiro. New York: Macmillan (in press).
Chemla, E. 2009c. Similarity: Towards a unified account of scalar implicatures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Semantics and Pragmatics (under revision).
Cowart W. (1997) Experimental syntax: Applying objective methods to sentence judgments. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
Evans J., Barston J., Pollard P. (1983) On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition 11(3): 295–306
Gajewski, J.R. 2005. Neg-raising: Presupposition and polarity. PhD dissertation, MIT.
George, B.R. 2008. Presupposition repairs: A static, trivalent approach to predict projection. Master’s thesis, UCLA.
Geurts B. (1999) Presuppositions and pronouns. Elsevier, New York
Grice, H.P. 1967. Logic and conversation. The William James Lectures, delivered at Harvard University. Republished in Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Heim I. (1983) On the projection problem for presuppositions. Proceedings of WCCFL 2: 114–125
Horn, L.R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Kadmon N. (2001) Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford
Karttunen L. (1973) Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 169–193
Löbner S. (2000) Polarity in natural language: Predication, quantification and negation in particular and characterizing sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(3): 213–308
Noveck I.A., Posada A. (2003) Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85(2): 203–210
Pérez Carballo, A. 2006. A first shot at the proviso problem. Ms., MIT.
Schlenker, P. 2007, July. Anti-dynamics: Presupposition projection without dynamic semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16(3): 325–356.
Schlenker P. (2008) Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics 34(3): 157–212
Schwarzschild R. (1993) Plurals, presuppositions and the sources of distributivity. Natural Language Semantics 2(3): 201–248
Soames, S. 1989. Presupposition. In Handbook of philosophical logic, ed. D. Gabbay and F. Guenther, 553–616, Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stalnaker, R.C. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and philosophy, ed. M. Munitz and P. Unger, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.