Pregnancy and thrombosis risk for women without a history of thrombotic events: a retrospective study of the real risks

Thrombosis Journal - Tập 20 - Trang 1-11 - 2022
Elisavet Grouzi1, Abraham Pouliakis2, Αnthi Aktypi3, Anna Christoforidou4, Paraskevi Kotsi5, Georgios Αnagnostou6, Aikaterini Foifa7, Emmanouil Papadakis8
1Consultant of Hematology, Head of Transfusion Service and Clinical Haemostasis, St Savvas” Oncology Hospital, Athens, Greece
22nd Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ATTIKON” University Hospital, Athens, Greece
3Hematology, OLYMPION General Clinic, Patras, Greece
4Hematologist of Hematology Department, Bioclinic Salonica, Thessaloniki, Greece
5Transfusion Medicine, Director Blood Bank and Hematology Laboratory, Medical School University of Thessaly, General University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa, Greece
6Transfusion Service and Clinical Haemostasis, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece
7Transfusion Department, Iaso General Maternity and Gynecology Clinic, Athens, Greece
8Thrombosis & Hemostasis clinic Ob/Gyn Hematology, Genesis Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

Tóm tắt

During pregnancy and puerperium women are at high VTE risk. Current guidelines recommend dynamic VTE-risk assessment during pregnancy. Based on related RCOG-guidelines we constructed a digital VTE-risk assessment tool: PATrisks ( www.PATrisks.com ). Using this tool, we retrospectively evaluated the thrombotic risk in 742 women from our previous work, women who received thromboprophylaxis based on clinical experience for A) pregnancy complications, B) IVF treatment and C) prothrombotic tendency, in order to investigate whether that practice was justified according to the PATrisks scoring system for VTE prevention. Women with pregnancy complications [Group-A: 445], women who had undergone IVF [Group-B:132] and women with a prothrombotic tendency (thrombophilia, family history of VTE, other) [Group-C:165] were assessed using the PATrisks scoring system for thrombotic risk. The women were assigned into one of the following risk categories: low (score ≤ 2), intermediate (score = 3) and high (score ≥ 4). Further analysis per risk factor type (pre-existing or obstetric) and for various combinations of them, was also performed. We evaluated thrombotic risk early in pregnancy, and in the peripartum period. The mean risk score antepartum was higher for women in Group B (3.3 in comparison with 1.9 and 2.0 in Group A and Group C respectively). Moreover, the risk score increased significantly postpartum for all Groups. The chi-square test also proved that there was a higher percentage of women at high or intermediate risk in group B compared to C before birth (55.3% vs.26.1% respectively, p < 0.0001, OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 2.2 – 5.7) and similarly after birth (85.6% vs. 56.4%, OR: 4.6, 95%CI: 2.6–8.2, p < 0.0001). In total 12 (1.6%) out of 742 women experienced thrombotic events, whether pre- or post-partum. LMWHs are widely prescribed during pregnancy for a number of indications, even when a proven scientific basis for such a practice is lacking. However, a considerable percentage of women were already at VTE-risk according to PATrisks and might have derived an additional benefit from LMWH in the form of VTE prevention. The rational use of these drugs should be optimized by establishing and implementing routine risk assessment for all pregnant women and by providing the necessary education to healthcare professionals.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Blondon M, Casini A, Hoppe KK, Boehlen F, Righini M, Smith NL. Risks of venous thromboembolism after cesarean sections: a meta-analysis. Chest. 2016;150(3):572–96. Gray G, Nelson-Piercy C. Thromboembolic disorders in obstetrics. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;26(1):53–64. Heit JA, Kobbervig CE, James AH, Petterson TM, Bailey KR, Melton LJ 3rd. Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(10):697–706. Abdul Sultan A, Tata LJ, Grainge MJ, West J. The incidence of first venous thromboembolism in and around pregnancy using linked primary and secondary care data: a population based cohort study from England and comparative meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(7): e70310. Sucker C. Prophylaxis and therapy of Venous Thrombotic Events (VTE) in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2020;80(1):48–59. James AH, Jamison MG, Brancazio LR, Myers ER. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period: incidence, risk factors, and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(5):1311–5. Jacobsen AF, Skjeldestad FE, Sandset PM. Incidence and risk patterns of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium–a register-based case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(2):233 e231-237. Aracic N, Roje D, Jakus IA, Bakotin M, Stefanovic V. The impact of inherited thrombophilia types and low molecular weight heparin treatment on pregnancy complications in women with previous adverse outcome. Yonsei Med J. 2016;57(5):1230–5. Middeldorp S. Pregnancy failure and heritable thrombophilia. Semin Hematol. 2007;44(2):93–7. Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368(9535):601–11. Nelson-Piercy C, Powrie R, Borg JY, Rodger M, Talbot DJ, Stinson J, Greer IA. Tinzaparin use in pregnancy: an international, retrospective study of the safety and efficacy profile. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159(2):293–9. Ellison J, Walker ID, Greer IA. Antenatal use of enoxaparin for prevention and treatment of thromboembolism in pregnancy. BJOG. 2000;107(9):1116–21. Matzsch T, Bergqvist D, Bergqvist A, Hodson S, Dawes J, Hedner U, Ostergaard P. No transplacental passage of standard heparin or an enzymatically depolymerized low molecular weight heparin. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1991;2(2):273–8. Richter C, Sitzmann J, Lang P, Weitzel H, Huch A, Huch R. Excretion of low molecular weight heparin in human milk. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(6):708–10. Skeith L, Rodger M. Anticoagulants to prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: Is it time to put the needles away? Thromb Res. 2017;151(1):S38–42. Quaranta M, Erez O, Mastrolia SA, Koifman A, Leron E, Eshkoli T, Mazor M, Holcberg G. The physiologic and therapeutic role of heparin in implantation and placentation. PeerJ. 2015;3:e691. Papadakis E, Pouliakis A, Aktypi A, Christoforidou A, Kotsi P, Alphanagnostou G, Foifa A, Grouzi E. Low molecular weight heparins use in pregnancy: a practice survey from Greece and a review of the literature. Thromb J. 2019;17:23. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Thrombosis and Embolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium, Reducing the Risk (Green-top Guideline No. 37a). 2015 [https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg37a/]. Accessed: 15 Nov 2021 DiMaggio C. SAS for epidemiologists : applications and methods. New York: Springer; 2013. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2000. Lindhagen A, Bergqvist A, Bergqvist D, Hallbook T. Late venous function in the leg after deep venous thrombosis occurring in relation to pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;93(4):348–52. Bergqvist A, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A, Matzsch T. Late symptoms after pregnancy-related deep vein thrombosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(4):338–41. Greer IA, Aharon A, Brenner B, Gris JC. Coagulation and placenta-mediated complications. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2014;5(4): e0034. Rodger MA, Hague WM, Kingdom J, Kahn SR, Karovitch A, Sermer M, Clement AM, Coat S, Chan WS, Said J, et al. Antepartum dalteparin versus no antepartum dalteparin for the prevention of pregnancy complications in pregnant women with thrombophilia (TIPPS): a multinational open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;384(9955):1673–83. Robertson L, Wu O, Langhorne P, Twaddle S, Clark P, Lowe GD, Walker ID, Greaves M, Brenkel I, Regan L, et al. Thrombophilia in pregnancy: a systematic review. Br J Haematol. 2006;132(2):171–96.