Các tập hợp ưu tiên tối thiểu và tối đa trong việc xác định và phân loại các tiêu chí đa dạng một cách chắc chắn

Amaldi E, Pfetsch ME, Trotter LE, Jr (1999) Some structural and algorithmic properties of the maximum feasible subsystem problem. In: Proceedings of the 7th international IPCO conference on integer programming and combinatorial optimization. Springer, London, pp 45–59 Amgoud L, Prade J (2009) Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif Intell 173(34):413–436 Angilella S, Greco S, Matarazzo B (2010) Non-additive robust ordinal regression: a multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral. Eur J Oper Res 201(1):277–288 Belton V, Branke J, Eskelinen P, Greco S, Molina J, Ruiz F, Słowiński R (2008) Interactive multiobjective optimization from a learning perspective. In: Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Słowiński R (eds) Multiobjective Optim. Springer, Berlin, pp 405–433 Carenini G, Moore JD (2006) Generating and evaluating evaluative arguments. Artif Intell 170(11):925–952 Carver WB (1921) Systems of linear inequalities. Ann Math 23:212–220 Chakravarti N (1994) Some results concerning post-infeasibility analysis. Eur J Oper Res 73(1):139–143 Chinneck JW (1994) MINOS(IIS): infeasibility analysis using MINOS. Comput Oper Res 21(1):1–9 Chinneck JW (1997) Finding a useful subset of constraints for analysis in an infeasible linear program. INFORMS J Comput 9(2):164–174 Chinneck JW (2001) Fast heuristics for the maximum feasible subsystem problem. INFORMS J Comput 13(3):210–223 Chinneck JW (2008) Feasibility and infeasibility in optimization: algorithms and computational methods. Springer, New York Chinneck JW, Dravnieks EW (1991) Locating minimal infeasible constraint sets in linear programs. INFORMS J Comput 3(2):157–168 Corrente S, Greco S, Kadziński M, Słowiński R (2013) Robust ordinal regression in preference learning and ranking. Mach Learn 93(2–3):381–422 Dias LC, Mousseau V (2003) IRIS: a DSS for multiple criteria sorting problems. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 12(1):285–298 Doumpos M (2012) Learning non-monotonic additive value functions for multicriteria decision making. OR Spectr 34(1):89–106 EIU, Democracy Index (2010) Democracy in retreat. Economist Intelligence Unit, London Figueira J, Greco S, Słowiński R (2009) Building a set of additive value functions representing a reference preorder and intensities of preference: GRIP method. Eur J Oper Res 195(2):460–486 Fürnkranz J, Hüllermeier E (2010) Preference Learning. Springer, Berlin Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2011) \(\text{ ELECTRE }^\text{ GKMS }\): robust ordinal regression for outranking methods. Eur J Oper Res 214(1):118–135 Greco S, Kadziński M, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2012) Robust ordinal regression for multiple criteria group decision problems: UTA\(^{{\rm GMS}}\)-GROUP and UTADIS\(^{{\rm GMS}}\)-GROUP. Decis Support Syst 52(3):549–561 Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2004) Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules. Eur J Oper Res 158(2):271–292 Greco S, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2008) Ordinal regression revisited: multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions. Eur J Oper Res 191(2):415–435 Greco S, Mousseau V, Słowiński R (2010) Multiple criteria sorting with a set of additive value functions. Eur J Oper Res 207(4):1455–1470 Greco S, Słowiński R, Zielniewicz P (2013) Putting dominance-based rough set approach and robust ordinal regression together. Decis Support Syst 54(2):891–903 Greer JE, Falk S, Greer KJ, Bentham MJ (1994) Explaining and justifying recommendations in an agriculture decision support system. Comput Electron Agric 11(23):195–214 Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1998) Even Swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs. Harvard Bus Rev 76(2):137–138, 143–148, 150 Humphreys P, Wisudha A (1981) MAUD: an interactive computer program for the stucturing, decomposition, and recomposition of preferences between multiattributed alternatives. Technical Report 543, US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Alexandria Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Siskos Y (1982) Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision making: the UTA method. Eur J Oper Res 10(2):151–164 Jacquet-Lagrèze E, Siskos Y (2001) Preference disaggregation: 20 years of MCDA experience. Eur J Oper Res 130(2):233–245 Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R (2012) Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression. Omega 40(4):488–501 Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R (2013) RUTA: a framework for assessing and selecting additive value functions on the basis of rank related requirements. Omega 41(4):735–751 Kadziński M, Greco S, Słowiński R (2013) Selection of a representative value function for robust ordinal regression in group decision making. Group Decis Negot 22(3):429–462 Kadziński M, Tervonen T (2013) Robust multi-criteria ranking with additive value models and holistic pair-wise preference statements. Eur J Oper Res 228(1):169–180 Kadziński M, Tervonen T (2013) Stochastic ordinal regression for multiple criteria sorting problems. Decis Support Syst 55(1):55–66 Kass R, Finin T (October 1988) The need for user models in generating expert system explanation. Int J Expert Syst 1(4):345–375 Klein DA (1994) Decision analytic intelligent systems: automated explanation and knowledge acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey Labreuche C (2011) A general framework for explaining the results of a multi-attribute preference model. Artif Intell 175:1410–1448 Labreuche C, Maudet N, Mousseau V, Ouerdane W (2012) Explanation of the robust additive preference model by even swap sequences. In: 6th multidisciplinary workshop on advances in preference handling, pp 21–26 Labreuche C, Maudet N, Ouerdane W (2011) Minimal and complete explanations for critical multi-attribute decisions. In: ADT, pp 121–134 Lahdelma R, Salminen P (2012) The shape of the utility or value function in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis. OR Spectr 34(4):785–802 Larichev O (2001) Ranking multicriteria alternatives: the method ZAPROS III. Eur J Oper Res 131(3):550–558 March JG (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell J Econ 9:587–608 Mousseau V, Dias LC, Figueira J (2006) Dealing with inconsistent judgments in multiple criteria sorting models. 4OR 4(3):145–158 Mousseau V, Figueira J, Dias LC, Gomes da Silve C, Climaco J (2003) Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):72–93 Ouerdane W, Muadet N, Tsoukiás A (2010) Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) International series in operations research and management science 1, vol 142. Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp 177–208 Papamichail KN, French S (2003) Explaining and justifying the advice of a decision support system: a natural language generation approach. Expert Syst Appl 24(1):35–48 Sankaran J (1993) A note on resolving infeasibility in linear programs by constraint relaxation. Oper Res Lett 13(1):19–20 Słowiński R, Greco S, Matarazzo B (2009) Rough sets in decision making. In: Meyers RA (ed) Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer, New York, pp 7753–7787 Tamiz M, Mardle SJ, Jones DF (1996) Detecting IIS in infeasible linear programmes using techniques from goal programming. Comput Oper Res 23(2):113–119 van Loon JNM (1981) Irreducibly inconsistent systems of linear inequalities. Eur J Oper Res 8(3):283–288 Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K (2008) Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Manag Sci 54(7):1336–1349