Preference for a segmented schedule using a brief S+ stimulus correlated with a great delay reduction in humans

Autor, S.M., 1960. The strength of conditioned reinforcers as a function of frequency and probability of reinforcement. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Harvard University. Autor, 1969, The strength of conditioned reinforcers as a function of frequency and probability of reinforcement, 127 Duncan, 1972, The psychological distance to reward, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 18, 23, 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-23 Fantino, 1969, Choice and rate of reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 12, 723, 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-723 Fantino, 2008, Choice, conditioned reinforcement, and the Prius effect, Behav. Analyst, 31, 95, 10.1007/BF03392164 Herrnstein, 1964, Secondary reinforcement and rate of primary reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 7, 27, 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-27 Leung, 1986, Preference for less segmented schedules fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 46, 175, 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-175 Leung, 1988, Preference for simple interval schedules of reinforcement in concurrent chains: effect of segmentation ratio, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 49, 9, 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-9 Leung, 1989, Psychological distance to reward: a human replication, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 51, 343, 10.1901/jeab.1989.51-343 Leung, 1993, Psychological distance to reward: segmentation of aperiodic schedules of reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav., 59, 401, 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-401 Schuster, 1969, The strength of conditioned reinforcers as a function of frequency and probability of reinforcement