Preference discovery
Tóm tắt
Is the assumption that people automatically know their own preferences innocuous? We present an experiment studying the limits of preference discovery. If tastes must be learned through experience, preferences for some goods may never be learned because it is costly to try new things, and thus non-learned preferences may cause welfare loss. We conduct an online experiment in which finite-lived participants have an induced utility function over fictitious goods about whose marginal utilities they have initial guesses. Subjects learn most, but not all, of their preferences eventually. Choice reversals occur, but primarily in early rounds. Subjects slow their sampling of new goods over time, supporting our conjecture that incomplete learning can persist. Incomplete learning is more common for goods that are rare, have low initial value guesses, or appear in choice sets alongside goods that appear attractive. It is also more common for people with lower incomes or shorter lifetimes. More noise in initial value guesses has opposite effects for low-value and high-value goods because it affects the perceived likelihood that the good is worth trying. Over time, subjects develop a pessimistic bias in beliefs about goods’ values, since optimistic errors are more likely to be corrected. Overall, our results show that if people need to learn their preferences through consumption experience, that learning process will cause choice reversals, and even when a person has completed sampling the goods she is willing to try, she may continue to lose welfare because of suboptimal choices that arise from non-learned preferences.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aghion, P., Bolton, P., Harris, C., & Jullien, B. (1991). Optimal learning by experimentation. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(4), 621–654.
Andersen, S., Harrison, G. W., Lau, M. I., & Rutstrom, E. E. (2008). Lost in state space: Are preferences stable? International Economic Review, 49(3), 1091–1112.
Ariely, D., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2003). “Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 73–105.
Armantier, O., Lévy-Garboua, L., Owen, C., & Placido, L. (2016). Discovering preferences: A theoretical framework and an experiment.
Becker, G. S. (1996). Accounting for tastes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Braga, J., & Starmer, C. (2005). Preference anomalies, preference elicitation and the discovered preference hypothesis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 55–89.
Brezzi, M., & Lai, T. L. (2000). Incomplete learning from endogenous data in dynamic allocation. Econometrica, 68(6), 1511–1516. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00170.
Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree: An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97.
Chuang, Y., & Schechter, L. (2015). Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: A review and some new results. Journal of Development Economics, 117, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.008.
Cooke, K. (2017). Preference discovery and experimentation. Theoretical Economics, 12(3), 1307–1348.
Coursey, D. L., Hovis, J. L., & Schulze, W. D. (1987). The disparity between willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures of value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 679–690.
Cox, J. C., & Grether, D. M. (1996). The preference reversal phenomenon: Response mode, markets and incentives. Economic Theory, 7(3), 381–405.
Dasgupta, U., Gangadharan, L., Maitra, P., & Mani, S. (2017). Searching for preference stability in a state dependent world. Journal of Economic Psychology, 62(Supplement C), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.001.
Delaney, J. J., Jacobson, S. A., & Moenig, T. P. (2019). A theory of preference discovery.
Easley, D., & Kiefer, N. M. (1988). Controlling a stochastic process with unknown parameters. Econometrica, 56(5), 1045–1064.
Eckel, C. C., El-Gamal, M. A., & Wilson, R. K. (2009). Risk loving after the storm: A bayesian-network study of hurricane katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69(2), 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2007.08.012.
Kahneman, D., & Snell, J. (1990). Predicting utility. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J (pp. 295–310). London: University of Chicago Press.
Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? explorations of experienced utility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–405.
Keller, G., & Rady, S. (1999). Optimal experimentation in a changing environment. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(3), 475–507.
Kihlstrom, R. E., Mirman, L. J., & Postlewaite, A. (1984). Experimental consumption and the ‘Rothschild Effect’., Studies in Bayesian econometrics, New York; Amsterdam and Oxford: North-Holland; distributed in U.S. and Canada by Elsevier Science, New York (vol. 5, pp. 279–302).
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (2006). The construction of preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
List, J. A. (2003). Does market experience eliminate market anomalies? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 41.
Loewenstein, G., & Adler, D. (1995). A bias in the prediction of tastes. The Economic Journal, 105(431), 929–937.
Noussair, C., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2004). Revealing consumers’ willingness-to-pay: A comparison of the BDM mechanism and the Vickrey auction. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 725–741.
Piermont, E., Takeoka, N., & Teper, R. (2016). Learning the krepsian state: Exploration through consumption. Games and Economic Behavior, 100, 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2016.09.002.
Plott, C.R. (1996). Rational individual behaviour in markets and social choice processes: The discovered preference hypothesis. In: K.J. Arrow, et al (Eds.) The rational foundations of economic behaviour: Proceedings of the IEA Conference held in Turin, Italy, IEA Conference (vol. 114, pp. 225–250). New York: St. Martin’s Press; London: Macmillan Press in association with the International Economic Association.
Rothschild, M. (1974). A two-armed bandit theory of market pricing. Journal of Economic Theory, 9(2), 185–202.
Scitovsky, T. (1976). The joyless economy: An inquiry into human satisfaction and consumer dissatisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shogren, J. F., Cho, S., Koo, C., List, J., Park, C., Polo, P., et al. (2001). Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA. Resource and Energy Economics, 23(2), 97–109.
Shogren, J. F., Shin, S. Y., Hayes, D. J., & Kliebenstein, J. B. (1994). Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept. American Economic Review, 84(1), 255–270.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. London: Penguin.
van de Kuilen, G., & Wakker, P. P. (2006). Learning in the Allais paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33(3), 155–164.
Weber, R. A. (2003). Learning with no feedback in a competitive guessing game. Games and Economic Behavior, 44(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00002-2.
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x.