Các yếu tố dự đoán biến chứng xảy ra sau phẫu thuật ung thư tuyến tiền liệt bằng phương pháp mổ hở và hỗ trợ robot: một đánh giá hồi cứu của 1062 bệnh nhân liên tiếp được điều trị tại trung tâm hạng cao

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30 Oberlin DT et al (2016) The effect of minimally invasive prostatectomy on practice patterns of American urologists. Urologic oncology seminars and original investigations. Elsevier, Amsterdam Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205 Mitropoulos D et al (2013) Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations. ActasUrol Esp 37(1):1–11 Gan ZS et al (2020) Correlation of relative value units with surgical complexity and physician workload in urology. Urology 139:71–77 Sebben M et al (2020) Open approach, extended pelvic lymph node dissection, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of hospital readmission after prostate cancer surgery: a large retrospective study. Minerva UrolNefrol 72(1):72–81 Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody J (2003) Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technique. J Urol 169(6):2289–2292 Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160(6 Pt 2):2418–2424 Briganti A et al (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. EurUrol 61(3):480–487 Porcaro AB et al (2018) Clinical factors stratifying the risk of tumor upgrading to high-grade disease in low-risk prostate cancer. Tumori J 104(2):111–115 Porcaro AB et al (2016) Low-risk prostate cancer and tumor upgrading to higher patterns in the surgical specimen. Analysis of clinical factors predicting tumor upgrading to higher Gleason patterns in a contemporary series of patients who have been evaluated according to the modified Gleason score grading system. Urol Int 97(1):32–41 Porcaro AB et al (2017) Clinical factors of disease reclassification or progression in a contemporary cohort of prostate cancer patients elected to active surveillance. Urol Int 98(1):32–39 Porcaro AB et al (2019) Lymph nodes invasion of marcille’s fossa associates with high metastatic load in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the role of “Marcillectomy.” Urol Int 103(1):25–32 Cacciamani GE et al (2019) Extended pelvic lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer: should the Cloquet’s nodes dissection be considered only an option? Minerva UrolNefrol 71(2):136–145 Freire MP et al (2009) Anatomic bladder neck preservation during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. EurUrol 56(6):972–980 Porcaro AB et al (2019) Is a drain needed after robotic radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection? Results of a single-center randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0176 Epstein JI et al (2016) The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J SurgPathol 40(2):244–252 Pierorazio PM et al (2013) Prognostic G leason grade grouping: data based on the modified G leason scoring system. BJU Int 111(5):753–760 Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. EurUrol 71(4):618–629 Pompe RS et al (2018) Postoperative complications of contemporary open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using standardised reporting systems. BJU Int 122(5):801–807 Yaxley JW et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066 Wallerstedt Lantz A et al (2019) 90-Day readmission after radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison between robot-assisted and open surgery. Scand J Urol 53(1):26–33 Moschini M et al (2017) Incidence and predictors of 30-day readmission after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. ClinGenitourin Cancer 15(1):67–71 Xia L et al (2017) Predischarge predictors of readmissions and postdischarge complications in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 31(9):864–871 Fracalanza S et al (2008) Is robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy less invasive than retropubic radical prostatectomy? Results from a prospective, unrandomized, comparative study. BJU Int 101(9):1145–1149 Porcaro AB et al (2016) Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy accelerates postoperative stress recovery: Final results of a contemporary prospective study assessing pathophysiology of cortisol peri-operative kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. Asian J Urol 3(2):88–95 Porcaro AB et al (2015) Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is less stressful than the open approach: results of a contemporary prospective study evaluating pathophysiology of cortisol stress-related kinetics in prostate cancer surgery. J Robot Surg 9(3):249–255 Boscolo-Berto R et al (2020) The underestimated posterior lymphatic drainage of the prostate: an historical overview and preliminary anatomical study on cadaver. Prostate 80(2):153–161 Oderda M et al (2020) Indications for and complications of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer: accuracy of available nomograms for the prediction of lymph node invasion. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15220 Gil-Vernet JM (1996) Prostate cancer: anatomical and surgical considerations. Br J Urol 78(2):161–168 Porcaro AB et al (2017) Bilateral lymph node micrometastases and seminal vesicle invasion associated with same clinical predictors in localized prostate cancer. Tumori 103(3):299–306 Montorsi F et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. EurUrol 62(3):368–381 Porcaro AB et al (2020) High body mass index predicts multiple prostate cancer lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Asian J Androl 22(3):323 Porcaro AB et al (2019) Body mass index is an independent predictor of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications in patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy with extensive pelvic lymph node dissection. J Robot Surg 13(1):83–89