Xây dựng cấu trúc dự đoán trong hiểu ngôn ngữ: một nghiên cứu trên mẫu lớn về cấp phép gia tăng và tính song song
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abney SP (1986) Licensing and parsing. North East Linguist Soc 17(1):1–15
Ackerman L, Kazanina N, Yoshida M (2015) Does the cataphoric dependency formation help the parser resolve local ambiguity? [Poster]. In: The 28th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Southern California
Aho AV, Ullman JD (1972) The theory of parsing, translation, and compiling. Prentice-Hall
Altmann G, Steedman M (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30(3):191–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
Aoshima S, Phillips C, Weinberg A (2004) Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. J Mem Lang 51(1):23–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001
Aoshima S, Yoshida M, Phillips C (2009) Incremental processing of coreference and binding in Japanese. Syntax 12(2):93–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2009.00123.x
Baayen RH (2008) Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801686
Barr DJ, Levy R, Scheepers C, Tily HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J Mem Lang 68(3):255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using. J Stat Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Boyce V, Futrell R, Levy RP (2020) Maze made easy: better and easier measurement of incremental processing difficulty. J Mem Lang 111:104082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104082
Carlson K (2001) The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Lang Speech 44(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440010101
Chomsky N (1977) On wh-movement. In: Culicover PW, Wasow T, Akmajian A (eds) Formal syntax. Academic Press, pp 71–132
Chomsky N (1981) Lectures on government and binding: the pisa lectures. Foris
Chomsky N (1986) Barriers. MIT Press
Christianson K, Hollingworth A, Halliwell JF, Ferreira F (2001) Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cogn Psychol 42(4):368–407. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0752
Chung S, Ladusaw WA, McCloskey J (1995) Sluicing and logical form. Nat Lang Seman 3(3):239–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01248819
Clifton C (1993) Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Can J Exp Psychol Can Psychol Exp 47(2):222–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078817
Crocker MW (1996) Computational psycholinguistics: an interdisciplinary approach to the study of language. Springer
Cunnings I, Fujita H (2021) Quantifying individual differences in native and nonnative sentence processing. Appl Psycholinguist 42(3):579–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000648
De Vincenzi M (1991) Filler-gap dependencies in a null subject language: referential and nonreferential WHs. J Psycholinguist Res 20(3):197–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067215
Ferreira F, Patson ND (2007) The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Lang Linguist Compass 1(1–2):71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00007.x
Fiengo R, May R (1994) Indices and identity. MIT Press
Fodor JD, Inoue A (2000) Garden path re-analysis: attach (Anyway) and revision as last resort. In: de Vincenzi M, Lombardo V (eds) Cross-linguistic perspectives on language processing. Springer, pp 21–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3949-6_2
Forster KI, Guerrera C, Elliot L (2009) The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time. Behav Res Methods 41(1):163–171. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.1.163
Frazier L, Clifton C Jr (1996) Construal. MIT Press
Frazier L, Clifton C (1998) Comprehension of sluiced sentences. Lang Cognit Process 13(4):499–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909698386474
Frazier L, Rayner K (1982) Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cogn Psychol 14(2):178–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90008-1
Frazier L, Taft L, Roeper T, Clifton C, Ehrlich K (1984) Parallel structure: a source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Mem Cognit 12(5):421–430. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198303
Frazier L (1979) On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies [PhD Thesis, University of Connecticut]. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/AAI7914150/
Fujita H (2021b) On the parsing of garden-path sentences. Lang Cognit Neurosci 36(10):1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1922727
Fujita H, Cunnings I (2020) Reanalysis and lingering misinterpretation of linguistic dependencies in native and non-native sentence comprehension. J Mem Lang 115:104154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104154
Fujita H, Cunnings I (2021a) Lingering misinterpretation in native and nonnative sentence processing: evidence from structural priming. Appl Psycholinguist 42(2):475–504. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000351
Fujita H, Cunnings I (2021b) Reanalysis processes in non-native sentence comprehension. Biling Lang Cognit 24(4):628–641. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000195
Fujita H, Cunnings I (2022) Interference and filler-gap dependency formation in native and non-native language comprehension. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 48(5):702–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001134
Fujita H, Cunnings I (in press) Interference in quantifier float and subject-verb agreement. Lang Cognit Neurosci
Fujita H (2021a) An R Package for Creating Experimental Files in IbexFarm. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7RVX6
Gibson E (1998) Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68(1):1–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00034-1
Gibson E (2000) The dependency locality theory: a distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. Image, language, brain: papers from the first mind articulation project symposium. The MIT Press, pp 94–126
Gibson E, Hickok G, Schütze CT (1994) Processing empty categories: a parallel approach. J Psycholinguist Res 23(5):381–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143946
Gibson E (1991) A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown [PhD Thesis]. Carnegie Mellon University
Giskes A, Kush D (2021) Processing cataphors: Active antecedent search is persistent. Mem Cognit 49(7):1370–1386. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01176-z
Gorrell P (1995) Syntax and parsing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627682
Hall K, Yoshida M (2021) Coreference and parallelism. Lang Cognit Neurosci 36(3):296–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1827154
Ito A, Corley M, Pickering MJ, Martin AE, Nieuwland MS (2016) Predicting form and meaning: evidence from brain potentials. J Mem Lang 86:157–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
Ito A, Gambi C, Pickering MJ, Fuellenbach K, Husband EM (2020) Prediction of phonological and gender information: an event-related potential study in Italian. Neuropsychologia 136:107291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107291
Johnson-Laird PN (1983) Mental models. Cambridge University Press
Kamide Y, Mitchell DC (1999) Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Lang Cognit Process 14(5–6):631–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386211
Kazanina N, Lau EF, Lieberman M, Yoshida M, Phillips C (2007) The effect of syntactic constraints on the processing of backwards anaphora. J Mem Lang 56(3):384–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.003
Kim N, Carlson K, Dickey M, Yoshida M (2020) Processing gapping: parallelism and grammatical constraints. Q J Exp Psychol 73(5):781–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820903461
Kimball JP (1973) Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2(1):15–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(72)90028-5
Knoeferle P, Crocker MW (2009) Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German. Q J Exp Psychol 62(12):2338–2371. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902790070
Kush D, Dillon B (2021) Principle B constrains the processing of cataphora: evidence for syntactic and discourse predictions. J Mem Lang 120:104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104254
Kush D, Lidz J, Phillips C (2017) Looking forwards and backwards: the real-time processing of Strong and Weak Crossover. Glossa A J Gen Linguist 2(1):70. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.280
Lau E, Stroud C, Plesch S, Phillips C (2006) The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis. Brain Lang 98(1):74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.02.003
Merchant J (2001) The Syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press
Merchant J (2005) Fragments and ellipsis. Linguist Philos 27(6):661–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3
Omaki A, Lau EF, Davidson White I, Dakan ML, Apple A, Phillips C (2015) Hyper-active gap filling. Front Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00384
Phillips C (2006) The real-time status of island phenomena. Language 82(4):795–823. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0217
Phillips C, Parker D (2014) The psycholinguistics of ellipsis. Lingua 151:78–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.003
Pritchett BL (1988) Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language 64(3):539. https://doi.org/10.2307/414532
Pritchett BL (1991) Subjacency in a principle-based parser. In: Berwick RC, Abney SP, Tenny C (eds) Principle-based parsing: computation and psycholinguistics. Springer, pp 301–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3474-3_12
Pritchett BL (1992) Grammatical competence and parsing performance. University of Chicago Press
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Reinhart T (1976) The syntactic domain of anaphora [PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16400
Ross JR (1969) Guess who? In: Binnick RI, Davison A, Green GM, Morgan JL (eds) Proceedings from the annual meeting of the chicago linguistic society. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp 252–286
Sag IA (1976) Deletion and Logical Form [PhD Thesis]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Slattery TJ, Sturt P, Christianson K, Yoshida M, Ferreira F (2013) Lingering misinterpretations of garden path sentences arise from competing syntactic representations. J Mem Lang 69(2):104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.001
Staub A, Clifton C (2006) Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either or. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 32(2):425–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.2.425
Stjepanović S (2008) P-Stranding under sluicing in a non-p-stranding language? Linguist Inq 39(1):179–190
Sturt P (2003) The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. J Mem Lang 48(3):542–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00536-3
Sturt P, Pickering MJ, Crocker MW (1999) Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language comprehension. J Mem Lang 40(1):136–150. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2606
Tabor W, Hutchins S (2004) Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: digging-in effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30(2):431–450. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.431
Truswell R (2014) Binding theory. In: Carnie A, Sato Y, Siddiqi D (eds) The routledge handbook of syntax. Routledge, pp 214–238
van Gompel RPG, Liversedge SP (2003) The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29(1):128–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.128
Weinberg A (1993) Parameters in the theory of sentence processing: minimal commitment theory goes east. J Psycholinguist Res 22(3):339–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068016
Weinberg A (1999) A minimalist theory of human sentence processing. In: Epstein SD, Hornstein N (eds) Working minimalism. The MIT Press, pp 282–315. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7305.003.0013
Williams ES (1977) Discourse and logical form. Linguist Inq 8(1):101–139
Witzel N, Witzel J, Forster K (2012) Comparisons of online reading paradigms: eye tracking, moving-window, and maze. J Psycholinguist Res 41(2):105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-011-9179-x
Yoshida M, Dickey MW, Sturt P (2013) Predictive processing of syntactic structure: sluicing and ellipsis in real-time sentence processing. Lang Cognit Process 28(3):272–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.622905
Yoshida M, Nakao C, Ortega-Santos I (2014) The syntax of ellipsis and related phenomena. In: Carnie A, Sato Y, Siddiqi D (eds) The routledge handbook of syntax. Routledge, p 192