Dự đoán Peptide Tín hiệu Sử dụng Mạng Nơ-ron Hàm Cơ sở Sinh học và Cây Quyết định

Hagmann M. On the track of Ebola’s hideout. Science 1999; 286: 666 Nakai K. Protein sorting signals and prediction of subcellular localisation. Adv Protein Chem 2000; 54: 277–344 Geirasch L. Signal peptides. Biochemistry 1989; 28: 923–30 Nielsen H, Engelbrecht J, Brunak S, et al. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng 1997; 10: 1–6 Voet DV, Voet JG. Biochemistry. 2nd ed. New York: J Wiley, 1995: 308–9 von Heijne G. Patterns of amino acids near signal peptide cleavage sites. Eur J Biochem 1983; 133: 17–21 von Heijne G. Signal peptides: the limit of variation. J Mol Biol 1985; 184: 99–105 Chou KC. Using subsite coupling to predict signal peptides. Protein Eng 2001; 14: 75–9 von Heijne G. A new method for predicting signal sequence cleavage sites. Nucleic Acids Res 1986; 14: 4683–90 Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G. Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 3–9 Thomson R, Hodgman C, Yang ZR, et al. Characterising proteolytic cleavage site activity using bio-basis function neural network. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 1741–7 Yang ZR, Thomson R. Bio-basis function neural network for prediction of protease cleavage sites in proteins. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2005; 16: 263–74 Qian N, Sejnowski TJ. Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. J Mol Biol 1988; 202: 865–84 Dayhoff MO. Survey of new data and computer methods of analysis: atlas of protein sequence and structure. 5 Suppl. 3. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, 1978 Yang ZR, Chou KC. Predicting the O-linkage sites in glycoproteins using bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 903–8 Berry E, Dalby A, Yang ZR. Reduced bio basis function neural network for identification of protein phosphorylation sites: comparison with pattern recognition algorithms. Comput Biol Chem 2004; 28: 75–85 Yang ZR, Berry E. Reduced bio-basis function neural networks for protease cleavage site prediction. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2004; 2: 511–31 Cai YD, Chou KC. Artificial neural network model for predicting HIV protease cleavage site in protein. Adv Eng Software 1998; 29: 119–28 Yang ZR. Prediction of caspase cleavage sites using Bayesian bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 1831–7 Thomson R, Esnouf R. Prediction of natively disordered regions in proteins using a bio-basis function neural network. In: Yang ZR, Everson R, Yin HJ, editors. 5th International Conference on Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Volume 3177. Berlin: Springer, 2004; 109–17 Yang ZR, Thomson R, McNeil P, et al. RONN: the bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the detection of natively disordered regions in proteins. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 3369–76 Narayanan A, Wu XK, Yang ZR. Mining viral protease data to extract cleavage knowledge. Bioinformatics 2002; 18Suppl. 1: S5–13 Boulesteix A, Tutz G, Strimmer K. A CART-based approach to discover emerging patterns in microarray data. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 2465–72 Kretschmann E, Fleischmann W, Apweiler R. Automatic rule generation for protein annotation with the C4.5 data mining applied on SWISS-PROT. Bioinformatics 2001; 17: 920–6 Quinlan JR. C4.5: programs for machine learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1993 King O, Lee JC, Dudley AM, et al. Predicting phenotype from patterns of annotation. Bioinformatics 2003; 19Suppl. 1: i183–9 Krishnan VG, Westhead DR. A comparative study of machine-learning methods to predict the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms on protein function. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 2199–209 Li J, Liu H, Ng S, et al. Discovery of significant rules for classifying cancer diagnosis data. Bioinformatics 2003; 19Suppl. 2: 1193–102 Clare A, King RD. Predicting gene function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioinformatics 2003; 19Suppl. 2: II42–9 Freund Y, Mason L. The alternating decision tree learning algorithm. In: Bratko I, editor. Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 1999: 124–33 Middendorf M, Kundaje A, Wiggins C, et al. Predicting genetic regulatory response using classification. Bioinformatics 2004; 20Suppl. 1: 1232–40 Selbig J, Mevissen T, Lengauer T. Decision tree-based formation of consensus protein secondary structure prediction. Bioinformatics 1999; 15: 1039–46 Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992; 89: 10915–9 Doolittle RF. Similar amino acid sequences: chance or ancestry. Science 1981; 214: 149–59 Fitch WM, Smith TF. Optimal sequence alignments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983; 80: 1382–6 Gonnet GH, Cohen MA, Benner SA. Exhaustive matching of the entire protein sequence database. Science 1992; 256: 1443–5 Grantham J. Amino acid difference formulas to help explain protein evolution. Science 1974; 185: 862–4 Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992; 8: 275–82 Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based in position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol 1999; 292: 195–202 Rao JK. New scoring matrix for amino acid residue exchanges based on residue characteristic physical parameters. Int J Pept Protein Res 1987; 29: 276–81 Johnson MS, Overington JP. A structural basis for sequence comparisons: an evaluation of scoring methodologies. J Mol Biol 1993; 233: 716–38 Alberts B, Bray D, Johnson A, et al. Essential cell biology: an introduction to the molecular biology of the cell. New York: Garland Publishing, 1998: 26