Prediction methods and applications in the science of science: A survey

Bernal, 1939 Xia, 2017, Big scholarly data: A survey, IEEE Trans. Big Data, 3, 18, 10.1109/TBDATA.2016.2641460 Clauset, 2017, Data-driven predictions in the science of science, Science, 355, 477, 10.1126/science.aal4217 Hirsch, 2005, An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 16569, 10.1073/pnas.0507655102 Garfield, 1972, Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation, Science, 178, 471, 10.1126/science.178.4060.471 Bornmann, 2017, Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on web of science data, J. Informetr., 11, 164, 10.1016/j.joi.2016.12.001 Ioannidis, 2015, A generalized view of self-citation: Direct, co-author, collaborative, and coercive induced self-citation, J. Psychosom. Res., 78, 7, 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.11.008 Cai, 2019, Scholarly impact assessment: A survey of citation weighting solutions, Scientometrics, 118, 453, 10.1007/s11192-018-2973-6 Wang, 2017, Scientific collaboration patterns vary with scholars’ academic ages, Scientometrics, 112, 329, 10.1007/s11192-017-2388-9 Kong, 2019, Academic social networks: Modeling, analysis, mining and applications, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 132, 86, 10.1016/j.jnca.2019.01.029 Panagopoulos, 2017, Detecting rising stars in dynamic collaborative networks, J. Informetr., 11, 198, 10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.003 L.A. Hurley, A.L. Ogier, V.I. Torvik, Deconstructing the collaborative impact: article and author characteristics that influence citation count, in: ASIST ’13 Proceedings of the 76th ASIS & T Annual Meeting: Beyond the Cloud: Rethinking Information Boundaries, vol. 50, no. 1, 2013, p. 61. Kong, 2018, VOPRec: Vector representation learning of papers with text information and structural identity for recommendation, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput., 1 Singh, 2017, Understanding the impact of early citers on long-term scientific impact, 1 M. Singh, V. Patidar, S. Kumar, T. Chakraborty, A. Mukherjee, P. Goyal, The role of citation context in predicting long-term citation profiles: An experimental study based on a massive bibliographic text dataset, in: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2015, pp. 1271–1280. Shibata, 2012 Mcnamara, 2013 F. Davletov, A.S. Aydin, A. Cakmak, High impact academic paper prediction using temporal and topological features, in: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2014, pp. 491–498. R. Yan, J. Tang, X. Liu, D. Shan, X. Li, Citation count prediction: Learning to estimate future citations for literature, in: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2011, pp. 1247–1252. Bornmann, 2013, How to improve the prediction based on citation impact percentiles for years shortly after the publication date?, J. Informetr., 8, 175, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.005 S.U. Hassan, A. Akram, P. Haddawy, Identifying important citations using contextual information from full text, in: Digital Libraries, 2017, pp. 1–8. Chakraborty, 2014, Towards a stratified learning approach to predict future citation counts, 351 H.S. Bhat, L.H. Huang, S. Rodriguez, R. Dale, E. Heit, Citation prediction using diverse features, in: IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshop, 2016, pp. 589–596. Bai, 2017, An overview on evaluating and predicting scholarly article impact, Information, 8, 73, 10.3390/info8030073 Radicchi, 2008, Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 17268, 10.1073/pnas.0806977105 Waltman, 2012, Universality of citation distributions revisited, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63, 72, 10.1002/asi.21671 Redner, 2005, Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review, Phys. Today, 58, 49, 10.1063/1.1996475 Eom, 2011, Characterizing and modeling citation dynamics, PLoS One, 6, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0024926 Wallace, 2009, Modeling a century of citation distributions, J. Informetr., 3, 296, 10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.010 Wu, 2014, Generalized preferential attachment considering aging, J. Informetr., 8, 650, 10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.002 Wang, 2013, Quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science, 342, 127, 10.1126/science.1237825 Wang, 2014, Science communication. comment on quantifying long-term scientific impact, Science, 345, 149 H.W. Shen, D. Wang, C. Song, A.-L. Barabási, Modeling and predicting popularity dynamics via reinforced poisson processes, in: Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2014, pp. 291–297. S. Xiao, J. Yan, C. Li, B. Jin, X. Wang, X. Yang, S.M. Chu, H. Zha, On modeling and predicting individual paper citation count over time, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2016, pp. 2676–2682. X. Liu, J. Yan, S. Xiao, X. Wang, H. Zha, S.M. Chu, On predictive patent valuation: Forecasting patent citations and their types, in: Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017, pp. 1438–1444. Bai, 2019, Predicting the citations of scholarly paper, J. Informetr., 13, 407, 10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.010 M. Golosovsky, S. Solomon, Growing complex network of citations of scientific papers: Modeling and measurements, Phys. Rev. E 95. Min, 2018, Innovation or imitation: The diffusion of citations, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 69, 1271, 10.1002/asi.24047 Poncela-Casasnovas, 2019, Large-scale analysis of micro-level citation patterns reveals nuanced selection criteria, Nat. Hum. Behav., 3, 1, 10.1038/s41562-019-0585-7 M. Kim, D.A. McFarland, J. Leskovec, Modeling affinity based popularity dynamics, in: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, 2017, pp. 477–486. Cao, 2016, A data analytic approach to quantifying scientific impact, J. Informetr., 10, 471, 10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.006 Lü, 2011, Link prediction in complex networks: A survey, Physica A, 390, 1150, 10.1016/j.physa.2010.11.027 Martínez, 2016, A survey of link prediction in complex networks, ACM Comput. Surv., 49, 69, 10.1145/3012704 Liben-Nowell, 2007, The link-prediction problem for social networks, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58, 1019, 10.1002/asi.20591 Adamic, 2003, Friends and neighbors on the web, Social Networks, 25, 211, 10.1016/S0378-8733(03)00009-1 Zhou, 2009, Predicting missing links via local information, Eur. Phys. J. B, 71, 623, 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00335-8 M. Jawed, M. Kaya, R. Alhajj, Time frame based link prediction in directed citation networks, in: 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 2015, pp. 1162–1168. Linyuan, 2016, The h-index of a network node and its relation to degree and coreness:, Nature Commun., 7, 10168, 10.1038/ncomms10168 Y. Jia, L. Qu, Improve the performance of link prediction methods in citation network by using h-index, in: International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, 2017, pp. 220–223. Pobiedina, 2016, Citation count prediction as a link prediction problem, Appl. Intell., 44, 252, 10.1007/s10489-015-0657-y Pan, 2013, Author impact factor: Tracking the dynamics of individual scientific impact, Sci. Rep., 4, 4880, 10.1038/srep04880 Sinatra, 2016, Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact, Science, 354, aaf5239, 10.1126/science.aaf5239 Nezhadbiglari, 2016, Early prediction of scholar popularity, 181 Mazloumian, 2012, Predicting scholars’ scientific impact, PloS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049246 Havemann, 2015, Bibliometric indicators of young authors in astrophysics: Can later stars be predicted?, Scientometrics, 102, 1413, 10.1007/s11192-014-1476-3 Põder, 2017, A framework for the measurement and prediction of an individual scientist’s performance, Trames: J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 21, 3, 10.3176/tr.2017.1.01 Hirsch, 2007, Does the H index have predictive power?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 19193, 10.1073/pnas.0707962104 Acuna, 2012, Future impact: Predicting scientific success, Nature, 489, 201, 10.1038/489201a Mistele, 2019, Predicting authors’ citation counts and h-indices with a neural network, Scientometrics, 120, 87, 10.1007/s11192-019-03110-2 Dong, 2016, Can scientific impact be predicted?, IEEE Trans. Big Data, 2, 18, 10.1109/TBDATA.2016.2521657 O. Penner, R.K. Pan, A.M. Petersen, K. Kaski, S. Fortunato, On the predictability of future impact in science, Sci. Rep. 3. Bras-Amorós, 2011, A bibliometric index based on the collaboration distance between cited and citing authors, J. Informetr., 5, 248, 10.1016/j.joi.2010.11.001 Sarigöl, 2014, Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks, EPJ Data Sci., 3, 9, 10.1140/epjds/s13688-014-0009-x Guevara, 2016, The research space: Using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations, Scientometrics, 109, 1695, 10.1007/s11192-016-2125-9 L. Weihs, O. Etzioni, Learning to predict citation-based impact measures, in: ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2017, pp. 1–10. A. Gogoglou, A. Sidiropoulos, D. Katsaros, Y. Manolopoulos, A scientist’s impact over time: The predictive power of clustering with peers, in: 20th International Symposium on Database Engineering & Applications, 2016, pp. 334–339. Poder, 2017, A framework for the measurement and prediction of an individual scientist’s performance, Trames-J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 21, 3 Ayaz, 2018, Predicting scientific impact based on h-index, Scientometrics, 114, 993, 10.1007/s11192-017-2618-1 Börner, 2012, Design and update of a classification system: The UCSD map of science, PloS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0039464 Zhuge, 2006, Discovery of knowledge flow in science, Commun. ACM, 49, 101, 10.1145/1125944.1125948 Frandsen, 2012, Effects of academic experience and prestige on researchers’ citing behavior, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63, 64, 10.1002/asi.21666 Riikonen, 2008, National research contributions: A case study on finnish biomedical research, Scientometrics, 77, 207, 10.1007/s11192-007-1962-y Yan, 2009, Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 60, 2107, 10.1002/asi.21128 Gonçalves, 2014, Characterizing scholar popularity: A case study in the computer science research community, 57 Daud, 2013 X.L. Li, C.S. Foo, K.L. Tew, S.K. Ng, Searching for rising stars in bibliography networks, in: International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, 2009, pp. 288–292. Daud, 2015, Using machine learning techniques for rising star prediction in co-author network, Scientometrics, 102, 1687, 10.1007/s11192-014-1455-8 G. Tsatsaronis, I. Varlamis, S. Torge, M. Reimann, M. Schroeder, M. Zschunke, How to become a group leader? or modeling author types based on graph mining, in: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries: Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, 2011, pp. 15–26. Long, 1999 A. Daud, N.R. Aljohani, R.A. Abbasi, Z. Rafique, T. Amjad, H. Dawood, K.H. Alyoubi, Finding rising stars in co-author networks via weighted mutual influence, in: 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017, pp. 33–41. Seglen, 1997, Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research, BMJ, 314, 498, 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 Li, 2015, The child is father of the man: Foresee the success at the early stage, 655 Z. Ning, Y. Liu, X. Kong, Social gene — a new method to find rising stars, in: 2017 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications, ISNCC, 2017, pp. 1–6. Ding, 2018, Rising star evaluation in heterogeneous social network, IEEE Access, 6, 29436, 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2812923 Aboukhalil, 2014, The rising trend in authorship, The Winnower, 2 Huang, 2014, Link prediction based on time-varied weight in co-authorship network, 706 Ghasemian, 2016, Toward a better scientific collaboration success prediction model through the feature space expansion, Scientometrics, 108, 777, 10.1007/s11192-016-1999-x Medina-Acuña, 2019, Link prediction in co-authorship networks using scopus data, 91 Guo, 2014, Cross-domain scientific collaborations prediction with citation information, 229 J. Kim, M. Choy, D. Kim, U. Kang, Link prediction based on generalized cluster information, in: International Conference on World Wide Web, 2014, pp.317–318. B. Taskar, M.F. Wong, P. Abbeel, D. Koller, Link prediction in relational data, in: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003, pp. 659–666. Kashima, 2006, A parameterized probabilistic model of network evolution for supervised link prediction, 340 Evans, 2011, Community structure and patterns of scientific collaboration in business and management, Scientometrics, 89, 381, 10.1007/s11192-011-0439-1 Steyvers, 2004, Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery, 306 Rosen-Zvi, 2010, Learning author-topic models from text corpora, ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 28, 4, 10.1145/1658377.1658381 Yang, 2013, A multilevel information mining approach for expert recommendation in online scientific communities, Comput. J., 58, 1921, 10.1093/comjnl/bxu033 Ströde, 2016, Information extraction to improve link prediction in scientific social networks, 515 L.M. Bennett, H. Gadlin, Collaboration and team science, J. Invest. Med. 60. Ma, 2017, Clustering-based link prediction in scientific coauthorship networks, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C, 28, 10.1142/S0129183117500826 Zhang, 2017, Uncovering mechanisms of co-authorship evolution by multirelations-based link prediction, Inf. Process. Manage., 53, 42, 10.1016/j.ipm.2016.06.005 Hasan, A. Mohammad, Link prediction using supervised learning, in: Proc. of Sdm Workshop on Link Analysis Counterterrorism & Security, vol. 30, no. 9, 2006, pp. 798–805. H. Lima, T.H. Silva, M.M. Moro, R.L. Santos, W. Meira Jr., A.H. Laender, Aggregating productivity indices for ranking researchers across multiple areas, in: 2013 ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 2013, pp. 97–106. Kaur, 2013, Universality of scholarly impact metrics, J. Informetr., 7, 924, 10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.002 Bai, 2017, The role of positive and negative citations in scientific evaluation, IEEE Access, 5, 17607, 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2740226 Piwowar, 2013, Altmetrics: Value all research products, Nature, 493, 159, 10.1038/493159a Brody, 2005, Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57, 1060, 10.1002/asi.20373 Eysenbach, 2011, Can tweets predict citations? metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact, J. Med. Internet Res., 13, 10.2196/jmir.2012 Ringelhan, 2015, I cite? Do facebook likes predict the impact of scientific work?, PloS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0134389 Peoples, 2016, Twitter predicts citation rates of ecological research, PloS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0166570 Thelwall, 2013, Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services, PloS One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0064841 Shema, 2014, Do blog citations correlate with a higher number of future citations? research blogs as a potential source for alternative metrics, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 65, 1018, 10.1002/asi.23037 S. Yuan, J. Tang, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, T. Xiao, Modeling and predicting citation count via recurrent neural network with long short-term memory, arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.02129. Abrishami, 2019, Predicting citation counts based on deep neural network learning techniques, J. Informetr., 13, 485, 10.1016/j.joi.2019.02.011