Prediction and assessment of demand response potential with coupon incentives in highly renewable power systems

Hao Ming1, Bainan Xia2, Kiyeob Lee3, Adekunle Adepoju3, Srinivas Shakkottai1, Le Xie3
1Electric Reliability Council of Texas, 800 Airport Rd, Taylor, TX, 78664, USA
2Intellectual Ventures, Bellevue, WA, USA
3Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractDemand Response (DR) provides both operational and financial benefits to a variety of stakeholders in the power system. For example, in the deregulated market operated by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), load serving entities (LSEs) usually purchase electricity from the wholesale market (either in day-ahead or real-time market) and sign fixed retail price contracts with their end-consumers. Therefore, incentivizing end-consumers’ load shift from peak to off-peak hours could benefit the LSE in terms of reducing its purchase of electricity under high prices from the real-time market. As the first-of-its-kind implementation of Coupon Incentive-based Demand Response (CIDR), the EnergyCoupon project provides end-consumers with dynamic time-of-use DR event announcements, individualized load reduction targets with EnergyCoupons as the incentive for meeting these targets, as well as periodic lotteries using these coupons as lottery tickets for winning dollar-value gifts. A number of methodologies are developed for this special type of DR program including price/baseline prediction, individualized target setting and a lottery mechanism. This paper summarizes the methodologies, design, critical findings, as well as the potential generalization of such an experiment. Comparison of the EnergyCoupon with a conventional Time-of-Use (TOU) price-based DR program is also conducted. Experimental results in the year 2017 show that by combining dynamic coupon offers with periodic lotteries, the effective cost for demand response providers in EnergyCoupon can be substantially reduced, while achieving a similar level of demand reduction as conventional DR programs.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Electric Reliability Council of Texas. (2020). ERCOT.com, [online] Available: http://www.ercot.com/.

Green the Grid, Green the Grid: the role of storage and demand response. (2015) [online] Available: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/63041.pdf.

U.S. Department of Energy. (2006). Benefit of demand response in electricity market and recommendations for achieving them, [online] Available: http://www.caiso.com/Documents/DemandResponseandProxyDemandResourcesFrequentlyAskedQuestions.pdf.

New York Independent System Operator (NYISO). (2009). Day-ahead demand response program manual, [online] Available: http://www.nyiso.com/public/webdocs/markets_operations/documents/Manuals_and_Guides/Manuals/Operations/dadrp_mnl.pdf.

California ISO. (2015). Demand response user guide, [online] Available: http://www.caiso.com/Documents/July20_2009InitialCommentsonPDAdoptingDRActivities_Budgets_2009-2011inDocketNos_A_08-06-001_etal_.pdf.

California ISO. (2011). Demand response & proxy demand resource-frequently asked questions, [online] Available: http://www.caiso.com/Documents/DemandResponseandProxyDemandResourcesFrequentlyAskedQuestions.pdf.

D. Hurley, P. Peterson, M. Whited. Demand response as a power system resource. (2013). Synapse Energy Economics Inc.

Ruiz, N., Cobelo, I., & Oyarzabal, J. (2009). A direct load control model for virtual power plant management. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 24(2), 959–966.

Gholian, A., Rad, H. M., & Hua, Y. (2016). Optimal industrial load control in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 7(5), 2305–2316.

Parvania, M., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M., & Shahidehpour, M. (2014). ISO's optimal strategies for scheduling the hourly demand response in day-ahead markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 29(6), 2636–2645.

ClearlyEnergy.com. (2018). Residential demand response programs, [online] Available: https://www.clearlyenergy.com/residential-demand-response-programs.

Airedale. (2018). ACIS building energy management system, [online] Available: http://airedale.com.

Power2Choose.org. (2018). [online] Available: http://www.powertochoose.org.

F. A. Wolak. (2007). Residential customer response to real-time pricing: The anaheim critical peak pricing experiment. Center for the Study of Energy Markets.

Xia, B., Ming, H., Lee, K.-Y., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Bansal, S., Shakkottai, S., & Xie, L. (2017). Energycoupon: a case study on incentive-based demand response in smart grid. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems, ACM (pp. 80–90).

U.S. Department of Energy. (2015). The pecan street project: developing the electric utility system of the future, Ph.D. thesis.

ENERNOC: An Enel Group Company. (2020). https://www.enernoc.com/resources/datasheets-brochures/get-more-commercial-and-industrial-demand-response.

OhmConnect. (2020). https://www.ohmconnect.com/.

Zhong, H., Xie, L., & Xia, Q. (2012). Coupon incentive-based demand response (CIDR) in smart grid. In 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, IEEE (pp. 1–6).

Zhong, H., Xie, L., & Xia, Q. (2013). Coupon incentive-based demand response: Theory and case study. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 28(2), 1266–1276.

Ming, H., & Xie, L. (2014). Analysis of coupon incentive-based demand response with bounded consumer rationality. In North American Power Symposium (NAPS), 2014, IEEE (pp. 1–6).

G. A. Schwartz, H. Tembine, S. Amin, S. S. Sastry. (2012). Electricity demand shaping via randomized rewards: A mean field game approach. Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.

Li, J., Xia, B., Geng, X., Ming, H., Shakkottai, S., Subramanian, V., & Xie, L. (2015). Energy coupon: a mean field game perspective on demand response in smart grids. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 43(1), 455–456.

Schwartz, G. A., Tembine, H., Amin, S., & Sastry, S. S. (2014). Demand response scheme based on lottery-like rebates. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 47(3), 4584–4588.

Li, J., Xia, B., Geng, X., Ming, H., Shakkottai, S., Subramanian, V., & Xie, L. (2018). Mean field games in nudge systems for societal networks. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Performance Evaluation of Computing Systems (TOMPECS), 3, 15(4).

Merugu, D., Prabhakar, B. S., & Rama, N. (2009). An incentive mechanism for decongesting the roads: a pilot program in Bangalore. In Proc. of ACM NetEcon workshop.

NuRide, Inc. (2020). [online] Available: https://www.nuride.com.

A. Ju. (2014). Experiment makes energy savings a game. Cornell Chronicle.

Pan, S., Shen, Y., Sun, Z., Mahajan, P., Zhang, L., & Zhang, P. (2013). Demo abstract: saving energy in smart commercial buildings through social gaming. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication, ACM (pp. 43–46).

Public Utilities Commission of Texas. (2017). https://www.smartmetertexas.com/home.

Weather Underground. wunderground.com. [online] Available: https://www.wunderground.com.

Chao, H.-p. (2011). Demand response in wholesale electricity markets: the choice of customer baseline. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 39(1), 68–88.

Nogales, F. J., Contreras, J., Conejo, A. J., & Espinola, R. (2002). Forecasting next-day electricity prices by time series models. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 17(2), 342–348.

Contreras, J., Espinola, R., Nogales, F. J., & Conejo, A. J. (2003). Arima models to predict next-day electricity prices. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 18(3), 1014–1020.

Conejo, A. J., Plazas, M. A., Espinola, R., & Molina, A. B. (2005). Day-ahead electricity price forecasting using the wavelet transform and Arima models. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 20(2), 1035–1042.

Wu, L., & Shahidehpour, M. (2010). A hybrid model for day-ahead price forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, 25(3), 1519–1530.

Jonsson, T., Pinson, P., Nielsen, H. A., Madsen, H., & Nielsen, T. S. (2013). Forecasting electricity spot prices accounting for wind power predictions. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 4(1), 210–218.

Muthirayan, D., Kalathil, D., Poolla, K., & Varaiya, P. (2016). Mechanism design for self-reporting baselines in demand response. In American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, American Automatic Control Council (AACC) (pp. 1446–1451).

Wikipedia. (2019). K-nearest Neighbors Algorithm. [online] Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-nearest_neighbors_algorithm.

Wikipedia. (2019). Kernel Regression. [online] Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_regression.

Edwards, R. E., New, J., & Parker, L. E. (2012). Predicting future hourly residential electrical consumption: a machine learning case study. Energy and Buildings, 49, 591–603.

Shi, X., Ming, H., Shakkottai, S., Xie, L., & Yao, J. (2019). Nonintrusive load monitoring in residential households with low-resolution data. Applied Energy, 252, 113283.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: part I, world scientific (pp. 99–127).

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

Gonzalez, R., & Wu, G. (1999). On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology, 38(1), 129–166.

Abdellaoui, M., Bleichrodt, H., & L'Haridon, O. (2008). A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(3), 245.

C. Martin, N. S. Malik. (2019). Power blows past $9,000 cap in Texas as heat triggers emergency, [online] Available: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-13/texas-power-prices-briefly-surpass-9-000-amid-searing-heat.

C. E. Commission. (2018). Sta_ forecast: average retail electricity prices 2005 to 2018. [online] Available: http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-200-2007-013/CEC-200-2007-013-SD.PDF.