Predicting Institutional Violence among Death Row Inmates: The Utility of the Sorensen and Pilgrim Model

American Psychiatric Association (1974) Clinical aspects of the violent individual. Author, Washington, D.C.

American Psychological Association Task Force (1978) Report of the task force on the role of psychology in the criminal justice system. Am Psychol 33:1099–1113

Barefoot v. Estelle (1983) 463 U.S. 880

Blume JH, Garvey SP, Johnson SL (2001) Future dangerousness in capital cases: always “at issue”. Cornell Law Rev 86:397–410

Borum R (1996) Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment: technology, guidelines, and training. Am Psychol 51:945–956

Cunningham MD (2006) Dangerousness and death: a nexus in search of science and reason. Am Psychol 61:828–839

Cunningham MD, Goldstein AM (2003) Sentencing determinations in death penalty cases. In: Weiner IB (Series Ed.), Goldstein A (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of psychology, vol. 11. Forensic psychology. Wiley, New York, pp. 407–436

Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ (1999) Don’t confuse me with the facts: common errors in violence risk assessment at capital sentencing. Crim Justice Behav 26:20–43

Cunningham MD, Reidy TJ (2002) Violence risk assessment at federal capital sentencing: Individualization, generalization, relevance, and scientific standards. Crim Justice Behav 29:512–537

Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR, Reidy TJ (2005) An actuarial model for assessment of prison violence risk among maximum security inmates. Assessment 12:40–49

Edens JF, Petrila J, Buffington-Vollum JK (2001) Psychopathy and the death penalty: can the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised identify offenders who represent “a continuing threat to society”? J Psych Law 29:433–481

Edens JF, Buffington-Vollum JK, Keilen A, Roskamp P, Anthony C (2005) Predictions of future dangerousness in capital murder trials: is it time to “disinvent the wheel”? Law Hum Behav 29:55–86

Koretz DM (1979) Validity shrinkage in psychopathology research: An example of the need for caution. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 88:328–333

Krauss DA, Lee DH (2003) Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors’ ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness. Int J Law Psychiatry 26:113–137

Krauss DA, Sales BD (2001) The effects of clinical and scientific expert testimony on juror decision making in capital sentencing. Psychol, Public Policy Law 7:267–306

Marquart JW, Sorensen JR (1988) Institutional and postrelease behavior of Furman-commuted inmates in Texas. Criminology 26:677–693

Marquart JW, Sorensen JR (1989) A national study of the Furman-commuted inmates: assessing the threat to society from capital offenders. Loyola Los Angel Law Rev 23:5–28

Marquart JW, Ekland-Olson S, Sorensen JR (1994) The rope, the chair, and the needle: capital punishment in Texas, 1923–1990. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX

Monahan J (1981) Predicting violent behavior: an assessment of clinical techniques. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

Monahan J et al (2005) An actuarial model of violence risk assessment for persons with mental disorders. Psychiatr Serv 56:810–815

Penry v. Lynaugh (1989) 492 U.S. 302

Reidy TJ, Cunningham MD, Sorensen JR (2001) From death to life: Prison behavior of former death row inmates in Indiana. Crim Justice Behav 28:62–82

Sorensen JR, Pilgrim RL (2000) An actuarial risk assessment of violence posed by capital murder defendants. J Crim Law Criminol 90:1251–1270