Precaution or Integrated Responsibility Approach to Nanovaccines in Fish Farming? A Critical Appraisal of the UNESCO Precautionary Principle
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson JM, Matthew SS (1997) Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 28:5–24
Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG, Agrawal CM (1996) Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials 17:93–102
CBD (Convention on Biodiversity) (2000) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. (Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity) Retrieved December 16, 2010 from http://bch.cbd.int/protocol/text/
CEC (2008) Code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
Cohen J (1997) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: Bohman JF, Rehg W (eds) Deliberative democracy. Essays on reason and politics. MIT, Cambridge, pp 67–91
Doubleday R (2007) Risk, public engagement and reflexivity: alternative framings of the public dimensions of nanotechnology. Health Risk Soc 9:211–227
EEA (European Environment Agency) (2002) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle, 1896–2000. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22
EC (Commission of the European Communities) (2000) Communication on the Precautionary Principle, (COM (2000) 1, 02-02-2000). Retrieved December 16, 2010 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/docum/20001_en.htm
European Union (2006) Consolidated Versions on the Treaty on the European Union and of the Treaty Establishing the European Community. Retrieved February 22, 2011, from http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2006:321E:0001:0331:EN:PDF
Ferguson A, Fleming IA, Hindar K, Skaala Ø, McGinnity P, Cross TF, Prodöhl P (2007) Farm escapes. In: Verspoor E, Stradmeyer L, Nielsen J (eds) The Atlantic Salmon: genetics, conservation and management. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 357–398
Freese W, Schubert D (2004) Safety testing and regulation of genetically engineered foods. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 21:299–324
Foster KR, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000) Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288:979–981
Gilbert N (2010) GM crop escapes into the American wild. Nature News, 6 August 2010. Retrieved December 15, 2010, from http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100806/full/news.2010.393.html
Goklany IM (2001) The Precautionary Principle; A critical appraisal of environmental risk assessment. Cato Institute, Washington DC
Grieger KD, Hansen S, Baun A (2009) The known unknowns of nanomaterials: describing and characterising uncertainty within environmental, health and safety risks. Nanotoxicology 3:222–233
Hacking I (1986) Culpable ignorance of interference effects. In: MacLean D (ed) Values at risk. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, pp 136–154
Hoeyer K (2003) ‘Science is really needed—that is all I know’: informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genet Soc 22:229–243
Jonas H (1979) Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main
Jonsen AR, Toulmin S (1988) The abuse of casuistry. a history of moral reasoning. University of California Press, Berkeley
Kaiser M (1997) Fish-farming and the precautionary principle: context and values in environmental science for policy. Found Sci 2:307–341
Karlsson M (2006) The precautionary principle, Swedish chemicals policy and sustainable development. J Risk Res 9:337–360
Kjølberg KL, Strand R (2011) Conversations about responsible nanoresearch. Nanoethics (crossreference to this number)
König A, Cockburn A, Crevel RWR, Debruyne E, Grafstroem R, Hammerling U, Kimber I, Knudsen I, Kuiper HA, Peijnenburg AACM, Penninks AH, Poulsen M, Schauzu M, Wal JM (2004) Assessment of the safety of food derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. Food Chem Toxicol 42:1047–1188
Kvakkestad V, Gillund F, Kjølberg K, Vatn A (2007) Scientists’ perspectives on the deliberate release of GM crops. Environ Values 16:79–104
Lü J-M, Wang X, Marin-Muller C, Wang H, Lin PH, Yao Q, Chen C (2009) Current advances in research and clinical applications of PLGA-based nanotechnology. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 9:325–341
Macnaghten P, Kearnes MB, Wynne B (2005) Nanotechnology, governance, and public deliberation: what role for the social sciences? Sci Commun 27:268–291
Messeguer J (2003) Gene flow assessment in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 73:201–212
Meyer G, Folher AP, Jørgensen RB, Krayer von Krauss M, Sandø P, Tveit G (2005) The factualization of uncertainty: risk, politics, and genetically modified crops – a case of rape. Agric Hum Values 22:235–242
Miller HI (1997) Policy controversy in biotechnology: an insider’s view. Academic, San Diego
Morris J (2002) The relationship between risk analysis and the precautionary principle. Toxicology 181–182:127–130
Myhr AI (2010) A precautionary approach to genetically modified organisms: challenges and implications for policy and science. J Agric Environ Ethics 23:501–525
Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M (2000) Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405:1017–1024
Nielsen KN, Fredriksen BN, Myhr AI (2011) Mapping uncertainties in the upstream: The case of PLGA nanoparticles in salmon vaccines. Nanoethics 5, this issue
O’Riordan T, Cameron J, Jordan A (eds) (2001) Reinterpreting the precautionary principle. Cameron May, London
Pogge T (ed) (2001) Global justice. Blackwell, Oxford
Pogge T (2002) World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Polity, Oxford
Raffensperger C, Tickner J (eds) (1999) Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle. Island, Washington, DC
Rawls J (1999) The law of peoples. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Singer P (2002) One world. The ethics of globalization. Yale University Press, New Haven
Skolbekken J-A, Ursin LØ, Solberg B, Christensen E, Ytterhus B (2005) Not worth the paper it’s written on? Informed consent and biobank research in a Norwegian context. Crit Public Health 15:335–347
Stirling A (2008) Opening up or closing down? Power, participation and pluralism in social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Human Values 33:262–294
UNESCO COMEST (2005) Report of the Expert Group on the Precautionary Principle of the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology (COMEST). Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001395/139578e.pdf
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (1992) Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Retrieved December 15, 2010 from http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163
Weaver SA, Morris MC (2005) Risks associated with genetic modification; a annotated bibliography of peer reviewed natural science publications. J Agric Environ Ethics 18:157–189
Weiss C (2006) Can there be science-based precaution? Environmental Research Letters, 1 (1). Retrieved November 15, 2010, from http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1748-9326/1/1/014003/
Wickson F, Gillund F, Myhr AI (2010) Treating nanoparticles with precaution: recognising qualitative uncertainty in scientific risk assessment. In: Kjølberg K, Wickson F (eds) Nano meets Macro: social perspectives on nanoscale sciences and technologies. Pan Stanford Publishing, Singapore