Pragmatism and Ethnomethodology
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Addams, J. (2002 [1902]). Democracy and social ethics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction: Studies of talk at work. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Bar-Hillel, Y. (1954). Indexical expressions. Mind, 63, 659–679.
Bernstein, R. J. (1992). The resurgence of pragmatism. Social Research, 59, 813–840.
Bourdieu, P. (1990 [1980]). The logic of practice. Transl. by R. Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Blumer, H. (1937). Social psychology. In E. P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and society (pp. 144–198). New York: Prentice-Hall.
Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Burke, K. (1969 [1945]). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Camic, C., & Gross, N. (2001). The new sociology of ideas. In J. R. Blau (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to sociology (pp. 236–249). Malden: Blackwell.
Clayman, S. E., & Gill, V. T. (2004). Conversation analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 589–606). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Colapietro, V. (2009). A revised portrait of human agency: A critical engagement with Hans Joas’s creative appropriation of the pragmatic approach. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, I, 1–23.
Cooley, C. H. (1966 [1918]). Social process. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1972 [1896]). The reflex arc concept in psychology. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Early essays. John Dewey: The early works, 1882–1898. Volume 5: 1882–1898 (pp. 152–88). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1985 [1915]). The logic of judgments of practice. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Essays on education and politics. John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924. Volume 8: 1915 (pp. 14–82). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988a). Reconstruction in philosophy. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Reconstruction in philosophy and essays. John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924. Volume 12: 1920 (pp. 77–202). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988b). Human nature and conduct. In J. A. Boydston & J. Dewey (Eds.), The middle works, 1899–1924. Volume 14: 1922. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988c [1925]). Experience and nature. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 1: 1925. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988d). The public and its problems. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Essays, reviews, miscellany, and the public and its problems. John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 2: 1925–1927 (pp. 235–372). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988e). The quest for certainty. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 4: 1929. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1988f). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 12: 1938. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. F. (1991 [1949]). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), Essays, typescripts, and knowing and the known. John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953. Volume 16: 1949–1952 (pp. 1–294). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dickstein, M. (Ed.). (1998). The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
Durkheim, E. (1982 [1895]). The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and its method. In S. Lukes (Ed.), Transl. by W. D. Halls. New York: Free.
Fine, G. A. (Ed.). (1995). A second Chicago School? The development of a postwar American sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1940). Color trouble. Opportunity, 18, 144–152.
Garfinkel, H. (1941). Color trouble. In E. J. O’Brien (Ed.), The best short stories 1941 and the yearbook of the American short story (pp. 97–119). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Garfinkel, H. (1949 [1942]). Research note on inter- and intra-racial momicides. Social Forces, 27, 369–381.
Garfinkel, H. (1952). The perception of the other: A study in social order. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Social Relations, Harvard University.
Garfinkel, H. (1963). A conception of, and experiments with, “trust” as a condition of stable concerted actions. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 187–238). New York: Ronald.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (1974). The origins of the term ‘ethnomethodology.’ In R. Turner (Ed.), Ethnomethodology (pp. 15–18). Baltimore: Penguin Education.
Garfinkel, H. (1988). Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal ordinary society, (I of IV): An announcement of studies. Sociological Theory, 6, 103–109.
Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential haecceity of immortal ordinary society (I) – an announcement of studies. In G. Button (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. A. W. Rawls (Ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H. (2004a). The shop floor problem in the renewal of sociology’s distinctive study of social order. Lecture in theory@madison. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin at Madison.
Garfinkel, H. (2004b). Foreword. In K. Liberman (Ed.), Dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture: An ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning (pp. ix–xiii). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, H. (2005 [1948]). Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action. Original title: Prospectus for an exploratory study of communicative effort and the modes of understanding in selected types of dyadic relationship. A. W. Rawls (Ed.). Boulder: Paradigm.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 338–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garfinkel, H., & Wieder, D. L. (1992). Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In G. Watson & R. M. Seiler (Eds.), Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology (pp. 175–217). Newbury Park: Sage.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131–158.
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66 (II), 133–136 [Special issue on “The ethnography of communication,” J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.).]
Gurwitsch, A. (1964). The field of consciousness. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2000). Documents and professional practice: “Bad” organizational reasons for “good” clinical records. In C. Heather & P. Luff (Eds.), Technology in action (pp. 31–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Heritage, J. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In A. Giddens & J. Turner (Eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224–272). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Heritage, J. (2002). Ad hoc inquiries: Two preferences in the design of routine questions in an open context. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. C. Schaeffer, & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview (pp. 313–334). New York: Wiley Interscience.
Heritage, J., & Lindström, A. (1998). Motherhood, medicine, and morality: Scenes from a medical encounter. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 397–438.
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. W. (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 359–417). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., Robinson, J. D., Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M., & Wilkes, M. (2007). Reducing patients’ unmet concerns in primary care: The difference one word can make. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, 1429–1433.
Hildebrand, D. L. (1995). Was Kenneth Burke a pragmatist? Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31, 632–658.
Horowitz, I. L. (1966). The intellectual genesis of C. Wright Mills. In C. W. Mills (Ed.), Sociology and pragmatism: The higher learning in America (pp. 11–31). New York: Oxford University Press.
James, W. (1905 [1890]). Principles of psychology, vol. 1. New York: H. Holt and Co.
James, W. (1987 [1902]). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. William James: Writings 1902–1910 (pp. 1–478). New York: The Library of America.
James, W. (1981a [1907]). Pragmatism. Indianapolis: Hackett.
James, W. (1981b [1909]). The meaning of truth. Pragmatism and the meaning of truth (pp. 167–352). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
James, W. (2003 [1912]). Essays in radical empiricism. Mineola: Dover.
Janowitz, M. (1991). On social organization and social control. J. Burk (Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (1985). G. H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. Chicago: M.I.T.
Joas, H. (1993). Pragmatism and social theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (1996). The creativity of action. Transl. by J. Gaines & P. Keast. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (1998). The inspiration of pragmatism: Some personal remarks. In M. Dickstein (Ed.), The revival of pragmatism: New essays on social thought, law, and culture (pp. 190–198). Durkham: Duke University Press.
Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Transl. by G. Moore. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Joas, H. (2003). War and modernity: Studies in the history of violence in the 20th century. Transl. by R. Livingstone. Oxford: Polity.
Joas, H., & Beckert, J. (2002). A theory of action: Pragmatism and the creativity of action. Transactional Viewpoints, 1, 1–4.
Joas, H., & Knobl, W. (2009). Social theory: Twenty introductory lectures. Transl. by A. Skinner. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kestenbaum, V. (1977). The phenomenological sense of John Dewey: Habit and meaning. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities.
Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society, 10, 239–316.
Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the sociological tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Livingston, E. (1986). Ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge.
Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lynch, M. (1993). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news: Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maynard, D. W. (2005). Social actions, gestalt coherence, and designations of disability: Lessons from and about autism. Social Problems, 52, 499–524.
Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2000). Toward a sociology of social scientific knowledge: Survey research and ethnomethodology’s asymmetric alternates. Social Studies of Science, 30, 323–370.
Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2002). Standardization and its discontents. In D. W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N. C. Schaeffer, & J. van der Zouwen (Eds.), Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview (pp. 3–46). New York: Wiley Interscience.
Maynard, D. W., Houtkoop-Steenstra, H., Schaeffer, N. C., & van der Zouwen, J. (Eds.). (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mead, G. H. (1964 [1903]). The definition of the psychical. In A. J. Reck (Ed.), Selected writings (pp. 25–59). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mills, C. W. (1940). Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904–913.
Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action: A study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers, 2 vols. New York: Free Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1932 [c. 1897]). A fragment. In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992a). Some consequences of four incapacities. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1: 1867–1893 (pp. 28–55). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992b [1877]). The fixation of belief. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1: 1867-1893 (pp. 109–123). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1992c [1878]). How to make our ideas clear. In N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Eds.), in The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Volume 1: 1867–1893 (pp. 124–141). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pollner, M., & Emerson, R. M. (2001). Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 118–135). London: Sage.
Pomerantz, A. M. (1980). Telling my side: “Limited access” as a “fishing” device. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 186–198.
Pomerantz, A. M. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, R. A. (1991). The problems of jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103–118). London: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Potter, J., & te Molder, H. (2005). Talking cognition: Mapping and making the terrain. In H. te Molder & J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 1–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls, A. W. (2000). “Race” as an interaction order phenomenon: W. E. B. Du Bois’s “double consciousness” thesis revisited. Sociological Theory, 18, 241–274.
Rawls, A. W. (2002). Editor’s introduction. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program, by Harold Garfinkel (pp. 1–64). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Rawls, A. W. (2005). Respecifying the study of social order—Garfinkel’s transition from theoretical conceptualization to practices in details. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action, by Harold Garfinkel (pp. 1–97). Boulder: Paradigm.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sabel, C. (1994). Learning by monitoring: The institutions of economic development. In N. J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (pp. 137–165). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sacks, H. (1992 [1964–72]). Lectures on conversation. Volumes I and II. In G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
Saussure, F. de (1959 [1916]). Course in general linguistics. Transl. by W. Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between macro and micro: Contexts and other connections. In J. Alexander, R. Munch, B. Giesen, & N. Smelser (Eds.), The micro-macro link (pp. 207–234). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216.
Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 1–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, A. (1967a [1945]). On multiple realities. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers. Volume I: The problem of social reality (pp. 207–259). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1967b [1953]). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers. Volume I: The problem of social reality (pp. 3–47). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1971 [1943]). The problem of rationality in the social world. In A. Brodersen (Ed.), Collected papers. Volume II: Studies in social theory (pp. 64–88). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Searle, L. F. (2005 [1994]). Charles Sanders Peirce. In M. Groden, M. Kreiswirth, & I. Szeman (Eds.), The Johns Hopkins guide to literary theory and criticism (pp. 723–726). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Seigfried, C. H. (1996). Pragmatism and feminism: Reweaving the social fabric. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Seigfried, C. H. (2002). Introduction to the Illinois edition. In J. Addams (Ed.), Democracy and social ethics (pp. ix–xxxviii). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Spiegelberg, H. (1956). Husserl’s and Peirce’s phenomenologies: Coincidence or interaction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17, 164–185.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
te Molder, H., & Potter, J. (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
Unger, R. M. (2007). The self awakened: Pragmatism unbound. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
van Dijk, T, (Ed.) (2006). Special issue: Discourse, interaction, and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8.
West, C. (1989). The American evasion of philosophy: A genealogy of pragmatism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Whitford, J. (2002). Pragmatism and the untenable dualism of means and ends: Why rational choice theory does not deserve paradigmatic privilege. Theory and Society, 31, 325–363.
Wieder, D. L. (1974). Language and social reality: The case of telling the convict code. The Hague: Mouton.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Transl. by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.
Zimmerman, D. H. (1970). The practicalities of rule use. In J. D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding everyday life: Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge (pp. 221–238). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Znaniecki, F. (1919). Cultural reality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.