Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency

Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1398–1396. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7466396

Azrin, N. H., & Lindsley, O. R. (1956). The reinforcement of cooperation between children. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 100–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042490

Baars, B. J., & Gage, N. M. (2010). Cognition, brain, and consciousness: Introduction to cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

Baum, W. M. (2017). Ontology for behavior analysis: Not realism, classes, or objects, but individuals and processes. Behavior and Philosophy, 45, 63–78.

Baum, W. M. (2018a). Three laws of behavior: Allocation, induction and covariance. Behavior Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(3), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000104

Baum, W. M. (2018b). Multiscale behavior analysis and molar behaviorism: An overview. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 110(3), 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.476

Baum, W. M. (2000). Being concrete about culture and cultural evolution. In F. Tonneau & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology, 13, Evolution, Culture, and Behavior (pp. 181–212). Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.

Baum, W. M., Richerson, P. J., Efferson, C. M., & Paciotti, B. M. (2004). Cultural evolution in laboratory microsocieties including traditions of rule giving and rule following. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.05.003

Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.

Bickle, J. (2003). Philosophy of neuroscience: A ruthlessly reductive account. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bickle, J. (2006). Reducing mind to molecular pathways: Explicating the reductionism implicit in current cellular and molecular neuroscience. Synthese, 151, 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9015-2

Bickle, J. (2007). Who says you can't do a molecular biology of consciousness? In M. Schouton & H. L. De Jong (Eds.), The matter of the mind: Philosophical essays on psychology, neuroscience, and reduction (pp. 275–297). Blackwell Publishing.

Bickle, J. (2008a). Cognitive behaviors and molecular neurobiology: explanations ‘in a single bound’. In J. E. Burgos & E. Ribes-Iñesta (Eds.), The brain-behavior nexus: Conceptual issues: Proceedings of the 10th biannual symposium on the science of behavior (pp. 13–22). Universidad de Guadalajara.

Bickle, J. (2008b). The molecules of social recognition memory: Implications for social cognition, extended mind, and neuroethics. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 468–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.015

Bierman, H. S., & Fernandez, L. (2011). Teoria dos jogos [Game theory]. (A. S. Marques, Trad.) Pearson.

Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90, 166–193. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.90.1.166

Borba, A., Silva, B. R., Cabral, P. A. A., Souza, L. B., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2014a). Effects of exposure to macrocontingencies in isolation and social situations in the production of ethical self-control. Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.4237

Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2014b). Establishing the macrobehavior of ethical self-control in an arrangement of macrocontingencies in two microcultures. Behavior and Social Issues, 23, 68–86. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v23i0.5354

Borba, A., Tourinho, E. Z., & Glenn, S. S. (2017). Effects of cultural consequences on interlocking behavior contingencies of ethical self-control. The Psychological Record, 67(3), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0231-6

Brigandt, I., & Love, A. (2012). Reductionism in biology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reduction-biology/

Brown, J., & Rachlin, H. (1999). Self-control and social cooperation. Behavioral Processes, 47, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-6357(99)00054-6

Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2015). Análise comportamental da cultura: Contingência ou metacontingência como unidade de análise? [Behavioral analysis of culture: Contingency or metacontingency as the unit of analysis?]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 11(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v11i2.1944

Cavalcanti, D. E., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2014). Seleção de práticas culturais complexas: Avaliação experimental de um análogo do procedimento de aproximação sucessiva [The selection of complex cultural practices: Experimental assessment of an analogous of the successive approximation procedure]. Psicologia e Saber Social, 3(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.12957/psi.saber.soc.2014.12199

Chalmers, D. J. (2006). Strong and weak emergence. In P. Clayton & P. Davies (Eds.), The re-emergence of emergence (pp. 244–254). Oxford University Press.

Chiesa, M. (1994). Radical behaviorism: The philosophy and the science. Authors Cooperative.

Cohen, D. J., & Lindsley, O. R. (1964). Catalysis of controlled leadership in cooperation by human stimulation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 5, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1964.tb02134.x

Costa, D., Nogueira, C. P. V., & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2012). Effects of communication and cultural consequences on choices combinations in INPDG with four participants. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44(1), 121–131.

Cozby, P. C. (2003). Métodos de Pesquisa em Ciências do Comportamento [Methods in Behavioral Research], 7th ed. (P. I. C. Gomide, E. Otta & J. O. Siqueira, transl.). Atlas. (Original work published in 2001).

Craver, C. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9097-x

Craver, C. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Clarendon Press.

Delgado, D. (2012). The selection metaphor: The concepts of metacontingencies and macrocontingencies revisited. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(1), 13–24.

Donahoe, J. (2004). Interpretation and experimental-analysis: An underappreciated distinction. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 5(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2004.10446387

Emurian, H. H., Emurian, C. S., & Brady, J. V. (1978). Effects of a pairing contingency on behavior in a three-person programmed environment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1978.29-319

Emurian, H. H., Emurian, C. S., & Brady, J. V. (1985). Positive and negative reinforcement effects on behavior in a three-person microsociety. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1985.44-157

Fantino, E., & Kennelly, A. (2009). Sharing the wealth: Factors influencing resource allocation in the sharing game. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 91, 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2009.91-337

Fantino, E., Gaitan, S. C., Meyer, S. F., & Stolarz-Fantino, S. (2006). Self-control in a Prisoner's Dilemma Game: The role of trial spacing and an interfering task. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(3), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.523

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a

Fernandes, D., Carrara, K., & Zilio, D. (2017). Apontamentos para uma definição comportamentalista de cultura [Notes towards a behaviorist definition of culture]. Acta Comportamentalia, 25(2), 265–280.

Fidelis, D. P., & Faleiros, P. B. (2019). O Jogo do Dilema do Prisioneiro no dia a dia: Uma análise comportamental [The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game in daily life: A behavioral analysis]. In A. L. Ferreira & P. B. Faleiros (Eds.), Jogos comportamentais: Análises e atuações em contextos do dia a dia [Behavioral games: Analyses and uses in daily contexts] (pp. 71–80). Imagine Publicações.

Foxall, G. R. (1999). The behavioral perspective model: Consensibility and consensuality. European Journal of Marketing, 33, 570–596. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910262143

Foxall, G. R. (2001). Foundations of consumer behaviour analysis. Marketing Theory, 1, 165–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059310100100202

Gilroy, S. P., & Kaplan, B. A. (2019). Furthering open science in behavior analysis: An introduction and tutorial for using GitHub in research. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 42, 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-019-00202-5

Glenn, S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392470

Glenn, S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origin of cultures. In K. Lattal & P. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Glenn, S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393175

Glenn, S., & Malott, M. (2004). Behavioral and cultural classifications: Reply to Mattaini. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 131–133. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.20

Glenn, S., Malott, M., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R., Sandaker, I., Todorov, J. C., Tourinho, E. Z., & Vasconcelos, L. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6634

Gomes, H. C. R., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2016). Metacontingências de autocontrole ético: Efeitos do aumento da magnitude de reforço [Metacontingencies of ethical self-control: Effects of increase in reinforcement magnitude]. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e32422

Green, L., Price, P. C., & Hamburger, M. E. (1995). Prisoner's Dilemma and the pigeon: Control by immediate consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1995.64-1

Guerin, B. (2001). Individuals as social relationships: 18 ways that acting alone can be thought of as social behavior. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.406

Hake, D. F., Vukelich, R., & Kaplan, S. J. (1973). Audit responses: Responses maintained by access to existing self or coactor scores during non-social, parallel work and cooperation procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19, 40–423. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1973.19-409

Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983

Harris, M. (1964). The nature of cultural things. Random House.

Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267

Hesse, B. W. (2018). Can psychology walk the walk of open science? American Psychologist, 73(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000197

Hosoya, N. M. S., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2016). Efeitos de interações verbais na seleção e manutenção de contingências comportamentais entrelaçadas [Effects of verbal interactions on the selection and maintenance on interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 24(3), 331–345.

Houmanfar, R., & Rodrigues, N. J. (2006). The metacontingency and the behavioral contingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.342

Houmanfar, R., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 78–103. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065

Hunter, C. S. (2012). Analyzing behavioral and cultural selection contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(1), 43–54.

Kim, J. (2005). Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press.

Kim, J. (2008). Reduction and reductive explanation. Is one possible without the other? In J. Kallestrup & J. Hohwy (Eds.), Being reduced: New essays on reduction, explanation and causation (pp. 93–114). Oxford University Press.

Krispin, J. V. (2016). What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level of selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6186

Marques, N. S., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2015). The selection of cultural units by non-contingent cultural events. Behavior and Social Issues, 24, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.22i0.4283

Martins, J. C. T., & Leite, F. L. (2016). Metacontingências e macrocontingências: Revisão de pesquisas experimentais brasileiras [Metacontingencies and macrocontingencies: A review of the Brazilian experimental research]. Acta Comportamentalia, 24(4), 453–469.

Martone, M. E., Garcia-Castro, A., & VanderBos, G. R. (2018). Data sharing in psychology. American Psychologist, 73(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000242

Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1975). Cooperation: An experimental analysis. Academic Press.

McCauley, R., & Bechtel, W. (2001). Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory & Psychology, 11(6), 736–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301116002

Meyer, S. F. (2010). Symmetry of reinforcement in social behavior. PhD dissertation. San Diego: University of California.

Moore, J. (1981). On mentalism, methodological behaviorism, and radical behaviorism. Behaviorism, 9, 55–67.

Moore, J. (2008). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism. Sloan Publishing.

Morford, Z. H., & Cihon, T. M. (2013). Developing an experimental analysis of metacontingencies: Considerations regarding cooperation in a four-person Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 5–20. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4207

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanations. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

Neves, A. B. V. S., Woelz, T. A. R., & Glenn, S. S. (2012). Effect of resource scarcity on dyadic fitness in a simulation of two-hunter nomoclones. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44(1), 159–167.

O'Connor, T., & Wong, H. (2012). Emergent properties. In: E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/properties-emergent

Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). The unity of science as a working hypothesis. In G. Maxwell, H. Feigl, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Concepts, theories, and the mind-body problem (pp. 3–36). Minnesota University Press.

Ortu, D., Becker, A. M., Woelz, T. A. R., & Glenn, S. S. (2012). An iterated four player prisoner's dilemma game with an external selecting agent: A metacontingency experiment. Revista Latinoamerica de Psícologia, 44, 111–120.

Palmer, D. C. (2011). Consideration of private events is required in a comprehensive science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392250

Pavanelli, S., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2014). A "modelagem" de contingências comportamentais entrelaçadas [The shaping of complex interlocking behavioral contingencies]. Acta Comportamentalia, 22(4), 425–440.

Rachlin, H. (2002). Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02000055

Saconatto, A. T., & Andery, M. A. P. A. (2013). Seleção por metacontingências: Um análogo experimental de reforçamento negativo [Selection by metcontingencies: An experimental analog of negative reinforcement]. Interação em Psicologia, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v17i1.26779

Sampaio, A. A., Araújo, L. A. S., Gonçalo, M. E., Ferraz, J. C., Alves Filho, A. P., Brito, I. S., Barros, N. M., & Calado, J. I. F. (2013). Exploring the role of verbal behavior in a new experimental test for the study of metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4180

Sandaker, I. (2010). Some comments on “Emergence and metacontingency”. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 90–93. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3222

Schaffner, K. F. (1993). Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. The University of Chicago Press.

Schaffner, K. F. (2006). Reduction: The Cheshire cat problem and a return to roots. Synthese, 151, 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-006-9031-2

Schmitt, D. R. (1976). Some conditions affecting the choice to cooperate or compete. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1976.25-165

Schmitt, D. R. (1984). Interpersonal relations: Cooperation and competition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-377

Schmitt, D. R. (1998). Effects of reward distribution and performance feedback on competitive responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1998.69-263

Schmitt, D. R. (2000). Effects of competitive reward distribution on auditing and competitive responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-115

Schmitt, D. R., & Marwell, G. (1968). Stimulus control in the experimental study of cooperation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11, 571–574. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1968.11-571

Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. The American Psychologist, 11(5), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047662

Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Skinner, B. F. (1961). Current trends in experimental psychology. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Cumulative record: A selection of papers (2nd ed., pp. 223–241). Appleton-Century-Crofts (Original work published 1947).

Skinner, B. F. (1962). Two synthetic social relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 531–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1962.5-531

Skinner, B. F. (1965). Science and human behavior. The Free Press (Original work published 1953).

Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. Alfred A. Knopf.

Skinner, B. F. (1983). A matter of consequences: Part three of an autobiography. Alfred A. Knopf.

Smith, L. D. (1986). Behaviorism and logical positivism: A reassessment of the alliance. Stanford University Press.

Smith, G. S., Houmanfar, R., & Louis, S. J. (2011). The participatory role of verbal behavior in an elaborated account of metacontingency: From conceptualization to investigation. Behavior and Social Issues, 20, 122–146. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v20i0.3662

Soares, P. F. R., Cabral, P. A. A., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2012). Efeitos de consequências culturais sobre a seleção e manutenção de duas práticas culturais alternadas [Effects of cultural consequences on the selection and maintenance of two alternated cultural practices]. Revista Brasileira de Análise do Comportamento, 8(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.18542/rebac.v8i1.1826

Soares, P. F. R., Rocha, A. P. M. C., Guimarães, T. M. M., Leite, F. L., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2018). Effects of verbal and non-verbal cultural consequences on culturants. Behavior and Social Issues, 27, 31–46. https://doi.org/10.5210/BSI.V.27I0.8252

Soares, P. F. R., Martins, J. C. T., Guimarães, T. M. M., Leite, F. L., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2019). Effects of continuous and intermittent cultural consequences on culturants in metacontingency concurrent with operant contingency. Behavior and Social Issues, 28, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00009-8

Stuart, M., Fehige, Y., & Brown, J. R. (2018). The routledge companion to thought experiments. Routledge.

Tadaiesky, L. T., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2012). Effects of support consequences and cultural consequences on the selection of interlocking behavioral contingencies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 44(1), 133–147.

Tan, L., & Hackenberg, T. D. (2016). Functional analysis of mutual behavior in laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 130, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.vl9i0.3221

Toledo, T. F. N., Benvenuti, M. F. L., Sampaio, A. A. S., Marques, N. S., Cabral, P. A. A., Araújo, L. A. S., Machado, L. R., & Moreira, L. R. (2015). Free culturant: A software for the experimental study of behavioral and cultural selection. Psychology & Neuroscience, 8(3), 366–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000016

Tonneau, F. (2016). Reforçamento operante e seleção natural: A analogia inútil [Operant reinforcement and natural selection: The useless analogy]. Interação em Psicologia, 20(3), 279–285. https://doi.org/10.5380/psi.v20i3.47412

Tonneau, F., & Sokolowski, M. (2000). Pitfalls of behavioral selectionism. In F. Tonneau & N. S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology, 13, Evolution, Culture, and Behavior (pp. 155–180). Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers.

Tonneau, F., & Sokolowski, M. (2001). Is operant selectionism coherent? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 558–559. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01544167

Ulrich, R. E., & Mountjoy, P. T. (1972). The Experimental Analysis of Social Behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

van Riel, R., & Van Gulick, R. (2019). Scientific reduction. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reduction/

Velasco, S. M., Benvenuti, M. F. L., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2012). Metacontingencies, experimentation and nonhumans: Searching for conceptual and methodological advances. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(1), 25–34.

Velasco, S. M., Benvenuti, M. F. L., Sampaio, A. A. S., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2017). Cooperation and metacontingency in pigeons. The Psychological Record, 67(4), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0256-x

Vichi, C., Andery, M. A. P. A., & Glenn, S. S. (2009). A metacontingency experiment: The effects of contingent consequences on patterns of interlocking contingencies of reinforcement. Behavior and Social Issues, 18, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.2292

Ward, T. A., Eastman, R. L., & Ninness, C. (2009). An experimental analysis of cultural materialism: The effects of various modes of production on resource sharing. Behavior and Social Issues, 18, 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v18i1.1950

Wiggins, J. A. (1969). Status differentiation, external consequences, and alternative reward distributions. In R. L. Burgess & D. Bushell Jr. (Eds.), Behavioral sociology: The experimental analysis of social process (pp. 109–126). Columbia University Press.

Yi, R., & Rachlin, H. (2004). Contingencies of reinforcement in a five-person prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-161

Zilio, D. (2016). On the autonomy of psychology from neuroscience: A case study of Skinner’s radical behaviorism and behavior analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000067

Zilio, D. (2019a). Mechanisms within contexts: First steps towards an integrative approach. Behavior and Philosophy, 47, 34–66.

Zilio, D. (2019b). On the function of science: An overview of 30 years of publications on metacontingency. Behavior and Social Issues, 28, 46–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-00006-x

Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. Columbia University Press.