Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility

BMJ - Tập 8 Số 3 - Trang 167-171 - 1999
Pieter van den Hombergh1, Richard Grol1, Henk van den Hoogen1, Wil van den Bosch1
1Department of General Practice and Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Houghton G. General practitioner reaccreditation: use of performance indicators. Br J Gen Pract 1995;45:677–81.

Miller G, Stirton J, Smith D, et al. Field test of entry standards for general practice. Condensed report; RACGP: 1995.

Hull R. Audit of general practice in Australia. Medical Audit News 1995;5:92.

Borgiel A. Practice assessment: the patient perspective. Abstract No. 2007. Dublin: WONCA, 1998.

Salisbury C. The Australian quality assurance and continuing education program as a mode for reaccreditation of general practitioners in the United Kingdom. Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:319–22.

Bergsma JJ. Onderlinge toetsing der praktijkvoering door huisartsen. [Mutual assessment of practice management by GPs.] Huisarts Wet 1966;9:82–7.

Commissie Toetsing van het NHG. Onderlinge Praktijkobservatie. Een draaiboek voor koppels huisartsen. [Mutual practice organisation. A script for GP couples.] Huisarts Wet 1984;27:130–4.

Gill G, Van den Hombergh P, Borgiel A, et al. Interpractice visits: experiences in 4 countries. Abstract No 380. Dublin: WONCA, 1998.

Eliasson G, Berg L, Carlsson P, et al. Facilitating quality improvement in primary health care by practice visiting. Quality in Health Care 1998;7:48–54.

Royal College of General Practitioners. What sort of doctor? Assessing quality of care in general practice. London: RCGP, 1985

College of Family Physicians of Canada. Practice assessment program. Montreal: CFPC, 1990.

Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Entry standards for general practices. Sydney: RACGP, 1996.

Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. Quality in family practice training program. Wellington: RNZCGP, 1988.

Royal College of General Practitioners. Guide and criteria for fellowship by assessment. Occasional Paper 50. London: RCGP, 1990.

Marinker M. Medical audit and general practice. London: BMJ Books, 1990.

Scrivens E. Policy issues in accreditation. Editorial. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:1–5.

Van den Hombergh P, Grol R, Van den Hoogen HJM, et al. Assessment of management in general practice: validation of a practice visit method. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:1743–50.

Van den Hombergh P, Grol R, Smits AJN, et al. Visitatie van huisartspraktijken; naar toetsing van de praktijkvoering.[A practice visit to assess the organisation of the general practitioner] Huisarts Wet 1995;38:169–74.

Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 1955;52:281–302.

DiVord G. Defining essential data for audit in general practice. BMJ 1990;300:92–4.

Bohigas L, Brooks T, Donahue T, et al. A comparative analysis of surveyors from six hospital accreditation programmes and a consideration of the related management issues. Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:7–13.

Sackin P, Barnett M, Andrew E, et al. Peer supported learning. Editorial. Br J Gen Pract 1997;47:68–9.