Potential of satellite and reanalysis evaporation datasets for hydrological modelling under various model calibration strategies

Addor, 2019, Legacy, rather than adequacy, drives the selection of hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 55, 378, 10.1029/2018WR022958 AghaKouchak, 2015, Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities, Rev. Geophys., 53, 452, 10.1002/2014RG000456 Allen, R. G., L. S.Pereira, D.Raes, and M.Smith (1998), Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper56, 326 pp, http://academic.uprm.edu/abe/backup2/tomas/fao%2056.pdf. Anderson, 1997, A two-source time-integrated model for estimating surface fluxes using thermal infrared remote sensing, Remote Sens. Environ., 60, 195, 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00215-5 Anderson, 2007, A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 112, 10.1029/2006JD007506 Armstrong, 2019, Spatial variability of mean daily estimates of actual evaporation from remotely sensed imagery and surface reference data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 23, 4891, 10.5194/hess-23-4891-2019 Badgley, 2015, On uncertainty in global terrestrial evapotranspiration estimates from choice of input forcing datasets, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 1449, 10.1175/JHM-D-14-0040.1 Bai, 2016, Assessment of the influences of different potential evapotranspiration inputs on the performance of monthly hydrological models under different climatic conditions, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 2259, 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0202.1 Bai, 2018, Intercomparison and evaluation of three global high-resolution evapotranspiration products across China, J. Hydrol., 566, 743, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.065 Bai, 2018, Incorporating vegetation dynamics noticeably improved performance of hydrological model under vegetation greening, Sci. Total Environ., 643, 610, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.233 Baik, 2018, Assessment of satellite-and reanalysis-based evapotranspiration products with two blending approaches over the complex landscapes and climates of Australia, Agricult. For. Meteor., 263, 388, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.09.007 Beck, 2017, Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 6201, 10.5194/hess-21-6201-2017 Becker, 2019, Spatially distributed model calibration of a highly managed hydrological system using remote sensing-derived ET data, J. Hydrol., 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123944 Beven, 2006, A manifesto for the equifinality thesis, J. Hydrol., 320, 18, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007 Bhattarai, 2019, An automated multi-model evapotranspiration mapping framework using remotely sensed and reanalysis data, Remote Sens. Environ., 229, 69, 10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.026 Birhanu, 2019, Effectiveness of introducing crop coefficient and leaf area index to enhance evapotranspiration simulations in hydrologic models, Hydrol. Process., 10.1002/hyp.13464 Blatchford, 2020, Evaluation of WaPOR V2 evapotranspiration products across Africa, Hydrol. Process., 10.1002/hyp.13791 Blöschl, 2019, Twenty-three Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective, Hydrol. Sci. J., 10.1080/02626667.2019.1620507 Bontemps, S., P.Defourny, E. V.Bogaert, O.Arino, V.Kalogirou, and J. R.Perez (2011), GLOBCOVER 2009-Products description and validation report, 53 pp, http://due.esrin.esa.int/files/GLOBCOVER2009_Validation_Report_2.2.pdf. Bosilovich, 2008, Evaluation of global precipitation in reanalyses, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 2279, 10.1175/2008JAMC1921.1 Bouaziz, 2020, Behind the scenes of streamflow model performance, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2020, 1 Brunner, 2020, Flood hazard and change impact assessments may profit from rethinking model calibration strategies, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2020, 1 Ceperley, 2017, Evaporation from cultivated and semi-wild Sudanian Savanna in west Africa, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 4149, 10.5194/hess-21-4149-2017 Chen, 2020, Evolution of evapotranspiration models using thermal and shortwave remote sensing data, Remote Sens. Environ., 237, 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111594 Chen, 2014, Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China, Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 279, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.045 Clark, 2015, Improving the representation of hydrologic processes in Earth System Models, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5929, 10.1002/2015WR017096 Clark, 2017, The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 3427, 10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017 Coenders-Gerrits, 2020, Evaporative Processes on Vegetation: An Inside Look, 35 Cui, 2019, Application of remote sensing to water environmental processes under a changing climate, J. Hydrol., 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.078 Cunge, 1969, On the subject of a flood propagation computation method (Musklngum method), J. Hydraul. Res., 7, 205, 10.1080/00221686909500264 Paca, 2019, The spatial variability of actual evapotranspiration across the Amazon River Basin based on remote sensing products validated with flux towers, Ecol. Process., 8, 6, 10.1186/s13717-019-0158-8 Danielson, J. J., and D. B.Gesch (2011), Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010)Rep. 2331-1258, 34 pp, US Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073. Dembélé, 2016, Evaluation and comparison of satellite-based rainfall products in Burkina Faso, West Africa, Int. J. Remote Sens., 37, 3995, 10.1080/01431161.2016.1207258 Dembélé, 2019, Gap-filling of daily streamflow time series using Direct Sampling in various hydroclimatic settings, J. Hydrol., 569, 573, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.11.076 Dembélé, 2020, Improving the predictive skill of a distributed hydrological model by calibration on spatial patterns with multiple satellite datasets, Water Resour. Res., 10.1029/2019WR026085 Dembélé, 2020, 2020, 1 Demirel, 2018, Combining satellite data and appropriate objective functions for improved spatial pattern performance of a distributed hydrologic model, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 22, 1299, 10.5194/hess-22-1299-2018 Diaz, 2019, Characterisation of the dynamics of past droughts, Sci. Total Environ. Donat, 2016, More extreme precipitation in the world's dry and wet regions, Nat. Clim. Change, 6, 508, 10.1038/nclimate2941 Dong, 2019, A Global Assessment of Added Value in the SMAP Level 4 Soil Moisture Product Relative to Its Baseline Land Surface Model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 6604, 10.1029/2019GL083398 Dorigo, 2017, ESA CCI Soil Moisture for improved Earth system understanding: State-of-the art and future directions, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 185, 10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.001 Efstratiadis, 2010, One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 55, 58, 10.1080/02626660903526292 Er-Raki, 2010, Assessment of reference evapotranspiration methods in semi-arid regions: can weather forecast data be used as alternate of ground meteorological parameters?, J. Arid Environ., 74, 1587, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.07.002 Famiglietti, 2013, Water in the balance, Science, 340, 1300, 10.1126/science.1236460 FAO/GIEWS (1998), Sahel Weather And Crop Situation 1998, 8 pp, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) / Global Information and Early Warning System (GIEWS), http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/x0059e/x0059e00.htm. Fatichi, 2016, An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology, J. Hydrol., 537, 45, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.026 Feddes, 1976, Simulation of Field Water-Uptake by Plants Using a Soil-Water Dependent Root Extraction Function, J. Hydrol., 31, 13, 10.1016/0022-1694(76)90017-2 Feng, 2019, Assessment of actual evapotranspiration variability over global land derived from seven reanalysis datasets, Int. J. Climatol., 39, 2919, 10.1002/joc.5992 Fisher, 2017, The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources, Water Resour. Res., 53, 2618, 10.1002/2016WR020175 Fowler, 2018, Improved Rainfall‐Runoff Calibration for Drying Climate: Choice of Objective Function, Water Resour. Res., 54, 3392, 10.1029/2017WR022466 Funk, 2015, The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes, Scientific Data, 2, 10.1038/sdata.2015.66 Gao, 2017, Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration methods in arid, semiarid, and humid regions, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 53, 791, 10.1111/1752-1688.12530 Gelaro, 2017, The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1 Gruber, 2017, Triple Collocation-Based Merging of Satellite Soil Moisture Retrievals, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 55, 6780, 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2734070 Guerschman, 2009, Scaling of potential evapotranspiration with MODIS data reproduces flux observations and catchment water balance observations across Australia, J. Hydrol., 369, 107, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.02.013 Harada, 2016, The JRA-55 Reanalysis: Representation of atmospheric circulation and climate variability, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 94, 269, 10.2151/jmsj.2016-015 Hargreaves, 1985, Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature, Appl. Eng. Agricult., 1, 96, 10.13031/2013.26773 Hartanto, 2017, Data assimilation of satellite-based actual evapotranspiration in a distributed hydrological model of a controlled water system, Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinform., 57, 123, 10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.015 Hartmann, 2012, The new global lithological map database GLiM: A representation of rock properties at the Earth surface, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 13, 10.1029/2012GC004370 He, 2019, Satellite data-driven modeling of field scale evapotranspiration in croplands using the MOD16 algorithm framework, Remote Sens. Environ., 230, 10.1016/j.rse.2019.05.020 He, 2020, A Global Drought and Flood Catalogue from 1950 to 2016, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 2020 Hengl, 2017, SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning, PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 Herman, 2018, Evaluating the role of evapotranspiration remote sensing data in improving hydrological modeling predictability, J. Hydrol., 556, 39, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.11.009 Hersbach, 2018 Hersbach, 2020, The ERA5 global reanalysis, Quart. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 10.1002/qj.3803 Hrachowitz, 2013, A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review, Hydrol. Sci. J., 58, 1198, 10.1080/02626667.2013.803183 Hrachowitz, 2017, HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 3953, 10.5194/hess-21-3953-2017 Hulsman, 2020, Learning from satellite observations: increased understanding of catchment processes through stepwise model improvement, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 2020, 1 Hunink, 2019, A simplified water accounting procedure to assess climate change impact on water resources for agriculture across different European river basins, Water, 11, 1976, 10.3390/w11101976 Huntington, 2006, Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis, J. Hydrol., 319, 83, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003 Immerzeel, 2008, Calibration of a distributed hydrological model based on satellite evapotranspiration, J. Hydrol., 349, 411, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.017 Jiang, 2019, The Role of Satellite-Based Remote Sensing in Improving Simulated Streamflow: A Review, Water, 11, 1615, 10.3390/w11081615 Jiang, 2020, Satellite-Based Evapotranspiration in Hydrological Model Calibration, Remote Sensing, 12, 428, 10.3390/rs12030428 Jiao, 2017, Impact of vegetation dynamics on hydrological processes in a semi-arid basin by using a land surface-hydrology coupled model, J. Hydrol., 551, 116, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.060 Jimenez, 2011, Global intercomparison of 12 land surface heat flux estimates, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 116, 10.1029/2010JD014545 Jiménez, 2018, Exploring the merging of the global land evaporation WACMOS-ET products based on local tower measurements, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 22, 10.5194/hess-22-4513-2018 Joiner, 2018, Global relationships among traditional reflectance vegetation indices (NDVI and NDII), evapotranspiration (ET), and soil moisture variability on weekly timescales, Remote Sens. Environ., 219, 339, 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.020 Jung, 2019, Uncertainties in Evapotranspiration Estimates over West Africa, Remote Sensing, 11, 892, 10.3390/rs11080892 Khan, 2018, Stand-alone uncertainty characterization of GLEAM, GLDAS and MOD16 evapotranspiration products using an extended triple collocation approach, Agricult. For. Meteor., 252, 256, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.022 Khu, 2005, Multiobjective calibration with Pareto preference ordering: An application to rainfall‐runoff model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 41, 10.1029/2004WR003041 Klemas, 2014, Remote sensing of floods and flood-prone areas: an overview, J. Coast. Res., 31, 1005 Kling, 2012, Runoff conditions in the upper Danube basin under an ensemble of climate change scenarios, J. Hydrol., 424, 264, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.01.011 Knoben, 2019, Inherent benchmark or not? Comparing Nash–Sutcliffe and Kling–Gupta efficiency scores, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 23, 4323, 10.5194/hess-23-4323-2019 Kobayashi, 2015, The JRA-55 reanalysis: General specifications and basic characteristics, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 93, 5, 10.2151/jmsj.2015-001 Koch, 2018, The SPAtial EFficiency metric (SPAEF): multiple-component evaluation of spatial patterns for optimization of hydrological models, Geosci. Model. Dev., 11, 1873, 10.5194/gmd-11-1873-2018 Koppa, 2020, Improving the Applicability of Hydrologic Models for Food–Energy–Water Nexus Studies Using Remote Sensing Data, Remote Sensing, 12, 599, 10.3390/rs12040599 Kumar, 2010 Kumar, 2013, Implications of distributed hydrologic model parameterization on water fluxes at multiple scales and locations, Water Resour. Res., 49, 360, 10.1029/2012WR012195 Kunnath-Poovakka, 2016, The efficacy of calibrating hydrologic model using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and soil moisture for streamflow prediction, J. Hydrol., 535, 509, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.018 Landerer, 2012, Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates, Water Resour. Res., 48, 10.1029/2011WR011453 Liou, 2014, Evapotranspiration estimation with remote sensing and various surface energy balance algorithms—A review, Energies, 7, 2821, 10.3390/en7052821 Liu, 2016, A worldwide evaluation of basin-scale evapotranspiration estimates against the water balance method, J. Hydrol., 538, 82, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.04.006 Liu, 2012, Trend-preserving blending of passive and active microwave soil moisture retrievals, Remote Sens. Environ., 123, 280, 10.1016/j.rse.2012.03.014 Long, 2014, Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites, Water Resour. Res., 50, 1131, 10.1002/2013WR014581 López, 2017, Evaluating the hydrological consistency of evaporation products using satellite-based gravity and rainfall data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 323, 10.5194/hess-21-323-2017 Maggioni, 2018, On the performance of satellite precipitation products in riverine flood modeling: A review, J. Hydrol., 558, 214, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.039 Maloney, 2019, Process-Oriented Evaluation of Climate and Weather Forecasting Models, Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc., 100, 1665, 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0042.1 Mao, 2017, Comparison of evapotranspiration estimates based on the surface water balance, modified Penman‐Monteith model, and reanalysis data sets for continental China, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122, 3228, 10.1002/2016JD026065 Martens, 2017, GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture, Geosci. Model. Dev., 10, 1903, 10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017 Martens, 2018, Terrestrial evaporation response to modes of climate variability, NPJ Climate Atmos. Sci., 1, 1 McCabe, 2008, Hydrological consistency using multi-sensor remote sensing data for water and energy cycle studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 430, 10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.027 McCabe, M., A.Ershadi, C.Jimenez, D. G.Miralles, D.Michel, and E. F.Wood (2015), The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally-gridded forcing data, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-283-2016. McCabe, 2017, The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 3879, 10.5194/hess-21-3879-2017 McCabe, 2019 McMahon, 2013, Estimating actual, potential, reference crop and pan evaporation using standard meteorological data: a pragmatic synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 17, 1331, 10.5194/hess-17-1331-2013 Melsen, 2016, HESS Opinions: The need for process-based evaluation of large-domain hyper-resolution models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 20, 1069, 10.5194/hess-20-1069-2016 Michel, 2016, TheWACMOS-ET project–Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 20, 803, 10.5194/hess-20-803-2016 Miralles, 2011, Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 15, 453, 10.5194/hess-15-453-2011 Miralles, 2016, The WACMOS-ET project-Part 2: Evaluation of global terrestrial evaporation data sets, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 20, 823, 10.5194/hess-20-823-2016 Mu, 2011, Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 1781, 10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019 Mueller, 2011, Evaluation of global observations‐based evapotranspiration datasets and IPCC AR4 simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, 10.1029/2010GL046230 Mul, 2015 Nicholson, 2000, Land surface processes and Sahel climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 117, 10.1029/1999RG900014 Nijzink, 2018, Constraining Conceptual Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8332, 10.1029/2017WR021895 Odusanya, 2019, Multi-site calibration and validation of SWAT with satellite-based evapotranspiration in a data-sparse catchment in southwestern Nigeria, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 23, 1113, 10.5194/hess-23-1113-2019 Oki, 2006, Global hydrological cycles and world water resources, Science, 313, 1068, 10.1126/science.1128845 Or, 2019, Surface evaporative capacitance: How soil type and rainfall characteristics affect global‐scale surface evaporation, Water Resour. Res., 55, 519, 10.1029/2018WR024050 Pan, 2019, Evaluation of global terrestrial evapotranspiration by state-of-the-art approaches in remote sensing, machine learning, and land surface models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 1 Peters-Lidard, 2017, Scaling, Similarity, and the Fourth Paradigm for Hydrology, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 3701, 10.5194/hess-21-3701-2017 Peters-Lidard, 2019, 100 years of progress in hydrology, Meteorol. Monographs Pokhrel, 2008, A spatial regularization approach to parameter estimation for a distributed watershed model, Water Resour. Res., 44, 10.1029/2007WR006615 Pomeon, 2018, Computationally Efficient Multivariate Calibration and Validation of a Grid-Based Hydrologic Model in Sparsely Gauged West African River Basins, Water, 10, 1418, 10.3390/w10101418 Rajib, 2018, Hydrologic model predictability improves with spatially explicit calibration using remotely sensed evapotranspiration and biophysical parameters, J. Hydrol., 567, 668-683,, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.10.024 Rakovec, 2016, Multiscale and Multivariate Evaluation of Water Fluxes and States over European River Basins, J. Hydrometeorol., 17, 287, 10.1175/JHM-D-15-0054.1 Ramoelo, 2014, Validation of global evapotranspiration product (MOD16) using flux tower data in the African savanna, South Africa, Remote Sensing, 6, 7406, 10.3390/rs6087406 Reichle, 2017, Land surface precipitation in MERRA-2, J. Climate, 30, 1643, 10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0570.1 Rientjes, 2013, Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration, J. Hydrol., 505, 276, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.006 Sakumura, 2014, Ensemble prediction and intercomparison analysis of GRACE time‐variable gravity field models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1389, 10.1002/2013GL058632 Samaniego, 2010, Multiscale parameter regionalization of a grid‐based hydrologic model at the mesoscale, Water Resour. Res., 46, 10.1029/2008WR007327 Samaniego, 2011, Predictions in a data-sparse region using a regionalized grid-based hydrologic model driven by remotely sensed data, Hydrol. Res., 42, 338, 10.2166/nh.2011.156 Samaniego, 2017, Toward seamless hydrologic predictions across spatial scales, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 21, 4323, 10.5194/hess-21-4323-2017 Savenije, 2001, Equifinality, a blessing in disguise?, Hydrol. Process., 15, 2835, 10.1002/hyp.494 Schaefli, 2010, Hydrologic predictions in a changing environment: behavioral modeling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 7, 7779 Senay, 2007, A coupled remote sensing and simplified surface energy balance approach to estimate actual evapotranspiration from irrigated fields, Sensors, 7, 979, 10.3390/s7060979 Senay, 2013, Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote sensing and weather datasets: A new parameterization for the SSEB approach, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 49, 577, 10.1111/jawr.12057 Senkondo, 2019, Comparing remotely-sensed surface energy balance evapotranspiration estimates in heterogeneous and data-limited regions: A case study of Tanzania's Kilombero Valley, Remote Sensing, 11, 1289, 10.3390/rs11111289 Shuttleworth, 1993 Sörensson, 2018, Intercomparison and uncertainty assessment of nine evapotranspiration estimates over South America, Water Resour. Res., 54, 2891, 10.1002/2017WR021682 Stisen, 2018, Moving beyond run‐off calibration—Multivariable optimization of a surface–subsurface–atmosphere model, Hydrol. Process., 32, 2654, 10.1002/hyp.13177 Su, 2002, The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 6, 85, 10.5194/hess-6-85-2002 Swenson, S. C. (2012), GRACE monthly land water mass grids NETCDF release 5.0. Ver. 5.0. PO.DAAC, CA, USA, https://doi.org/10.5067/TELND-NC005, [Dataset accessed 2018.11.01]. Talsma, 2018, Partitioning of evapotranspiration in remote sensing-based models, Agricult. For. Meteorol., 260, 131, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.05.010 Tapley, 2004, The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, 10.1029/2004GL019920 Teng, 2017, Flood inundation modelling: A review of methods, recent advances and uncertainty analysis, Environ. Modell. Softw., 90, 201, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.006 Thober, S., M.Cuntz, M.Kelbling, R.Kumar, J.Mai, and L. J. G. M. D. D.Samaniego (2019), The multiscale Routing Model mRM v1. 0: simple river routing at resolutions from 1 to 50 km, 2019, 1-26, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2501-2019. Tobin, 2017, Constraining SWAT calibration with remotely sensed evapotranspiration data, JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 53, 593, 10.1111/1752-1688.12516 Tolson, 2007, Dynamically dimensioned search algorithm for computationally efficient watershed model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 43, 10.1029/2005WR004723 Trabucco, A., and R.Zomer (2018), Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapo-Transpiration (ET0) Climate Database v2. CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information (CGIAR-CSI). Published online, available from the CGIAR-CSI GeoPortal athttps://cgiarcsi.community, https://figshare.com/articles/Global_Aridity_Index_and_Potential_Evapotranspiration_ET0_Climate_Database_v2/7504448/1accessed11.07.2019]. Trambauer, 2014, Comparison of different evaporation estimates over the African continent, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 18, 193, 10.5194/hess-18-193-2014 Tucker, 2005, An extended AVHRR 8‐km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data, Int. J. Remote Sens., 26, 4485, 10.1080/01431160500168686 Upton, 2014 Van der Ent, 2010, Origin and fate of atmospheric moisture over continents, Water Resour. Res., 46, 10.1029/2010WR009127 Velpuri, 2013, A comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water balance ET, Remote Sens. Environ., 139, 35, 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.013 Vervoort, 2014, Remotely sensed evapotranspiration to calibrate a lumped conceptual model: Pitfalls and opportunities, J. Hydrol., 519, 3223, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.034 Vinukollu, 2011, Multi‐model, multi‐sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration: Climatology, uncertainties and trends, Hydrol. Process., 25, 3993, 10.1002/hyp.8393 Vinukollu, 2011, Global estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches, Remote Sens. Environ., 115, 801, 10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.006 Wagner, 2012 Wambura, 2018, Improving a distributed hydrological model using evapotranspiration‐related boundary conditions as additional constraints in a data‐scarce river basin, Hydrol. Process., 32, 759, 10.1002/hyp.11453 Wang, 2018, Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimates in the Yellow River Basin against the water balance method, Water, 10, 1884, 10.3390/w10121884 Wang, 2012, A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability, Rev. Geophys., 50, 10.1029/2011RG000373 Weedon, 2014, The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA‐Interim reanalysis data, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7505, 10.1002/2014WR015638 Weerasinghe, 2020, Can we trust remote sensing evapotranspiration products over Africa?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1565, 10.5194/hess-24-1565-2020 West, 2019, Remote sensing for drought monitoring & impact assessment: Progress, past challenges and future opportunities, Remote Sens. Environ., 232, 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111291 Williams, 2016 Winsemius, 2008, Constraining model parameters on remotely sensed evaporation: justification for distribution in ungauged basins?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 12, 1403, 10.5194/hess-12-1403-2008 Yang, 2016, Evaluation of evapotranspiration models over semi‐arid and semi‐humid areas of China, Hydrol. Process., 30, 4292 Yilmaz, 2014, Comparison of prognostic and diagnostic surface flux modeling approaches over the Nile River basin, Water Resour. Res., 50, 386, 10.1002/2013WR014194 Zhang, 2020, Evaluation and comparison of multiple evapotranspiration data models over the contiguous United States: Implications for the next phase of NLDAS (NLDAS-Testbed) development, Agricult. For. Meteorol., 280, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107810 Zhang, 2016, A review of remote sensing based actual evapotranspiration estimation, Wiley Interdisciplin. Rev. Water, 3, 834, 10.1002/wat2.1168 Zhang, 2019, Can remotely sensed actual evapotranspiration facilitate hydrological prediction in ungauged regions without runoff calibration?, Water Resour. Res., e24394 Zhu, 2013, Remote Sensing, 5, 927, 10.3390/rs5020927 Zink, 2018, Conditioning a Hydrologic Model Using Patterns of Remotely Sensed Land Surface Temperature, Water Resour. Res., 54, 2976, 10.1002/2017WR021346