Potential Climate Benefits of Digital Consumer Innovations
Tóm tắt
Digitalization has opened up a wealth of new goods and services with strong consumer appeal alongside potential emission-reduction benefits. Examples range from shared, on-demand electric mobility and peer-to-peer trading of electricity, food, and cars to grid-responsive smart appliances and heating systems. In this review, we identify an illustrative sample of 33 digital consumer innovations that challenge emission-intensive mainstream consumption practices in mobility, food, homes, and energy domains. Across these domains, digital innovations offer consumers a range of potentially appealing attributes from control, choice, and convenience to independence, interconnectedness, and integration with systems. We then compile quantitative estimates of change in activity, energy, or emissions as a result of consumers adopting digital innovations. This novel synthesis of the evidence base shows clear but variable potential emission-reduction benefits of digital consumer innovations. However, a small number of studies show emission increases from specific innovations as a result of induced demand or substitution effects that need careful management by public policy. We also consider how concurrent adoption of digital consumer innovations across mobility, food, homes, and energy domains can cause broader disruptive impacts on regulatory frameworks, norms, and infrastructures. We conclude by arguing for the importance of public policy in steering the digitalization of consumer goods and services toward low-carbon outcomes.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Int. Gov. Panel Clim. Change (IPCC), 2014, Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 1
Allwood JM, 2019, Absolute Zero: Delivering the UK's Climate Change Commitment with Incremental Changes to Today's Technologies.
Socolow RH., 1978, Saving Energy in the Home: Princeton's Experiments at Twin Rivers
Gardner GT, 1995, Environmental Problems and Human Behavior
Stern PC., 2002, New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures, 201
Ger. Advis. Counc. Glob. Change (WBGU), 2019, Towards our common digital future
The World in 2050 (TWI2050), 2019, The Digital Revolution and sustainable development: opportunities and challenges
Kelly K., 2017, The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces that will Shape our Future.
McKinsey & Co, 2013, Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy
Int. Transp. Forum (ITF), 2016, Shared Mobility: Innovation for Liveable Cities
Rogers EM., 2003, Diffusion of Innovations
Martin E, 2016, Impacts of car2go on vehicle ownership, modal shift, vehicle miles traveled, and greenhouse gas emissions: an analysis of five North American cities
Harvard Business Review, 2015, Harvard Bus. Rev., 2015, 22
Guerin TF., 2017, Environ. Q. Manag., 27, 75
Behav. Insights Team (BIT), 2017, Evaluating the Nest Learning Thermostat.
Jacobs P, 2015, Energiesprong: Transition Zero
Kelly J, 2016, Does disaggregated electricity feedback reduce domestic electricity consumption? A systematic review of the literature, 14
Andersen LM, 2017, Using real-time pricing and information provision to shift intra-day electricity consumption: evidence from Denmark
King AA, 2015, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 57, 77
Clewlow RR, 2017, Disruptive transportation: the adoption, utilization, and impacts of ride-hailing in the United States
Cheris A, 2017, Retailers’ Challenge: How to Cut Carbon Emissions as E-Commerce Soars
Fulton L, 2017, Three revolutions in urban transportation: how to achieve the full potential of vehicle electrification, automation, and shared mobility in urban transportation systems around the world by 2050
Sprei F, 2015, Can car sharing facilitate a more sustainable car purchase, 1
McKinsey & Co, 2016, Automotive revolution—perspective towards 2030: how the convergence of disruptive technology-driven trends could transform the auto industry
Hughes T., 2017, Moody's Anal. Risk Perspect., 9, 16
Bajzelj B, 2019, Food Waste in Primary Production in the UK
Ipsos Mori, 2016, Poll conducted for The Vegan Society—incidence of vegans research
Ferguson D., 2019, The Guardian
Kurnia S, Hill S, Rahim MM, Larsen K, Braun P, Samson D. 2015. Open Food Network: the role of ICT to support regional food supply chains in Australia. arXiv:1606.01456 [cs.CY]
McFarland K, 2017, Social Innovation and Sustainable Consumption, 72
Coskun A, 2018, Int. J. Des., 12, 7
Moore S., 2016, The Disrupted Decade: 4 Disruptions that Will Shake Things Up for Energy Consumers
Int. Transp. Forum (ITF), 2015, Urban Mobility System Upgrade: How Shared Self-Driving Cars Could Change City Traffic
Lister K, 2011, The Shifting Nature of Work in the UK: Bottom Line Benefits of Telework
Porter ME, 2014, Harvard Bus. Rev., 92, 64
Seba T., 2014, Clean Disruption of Energy and Transportation
Graffy E, 2014, Energy Law J, 35, 1
Chies BM., 2017, Proceedings of the XVI Biennal IASC-Conference (Practicing the Commons: Self-Governance, Cooperation and Institutional Change), Utrecht, The Netherlands
Int. Smart Grid Action Netw. (ISGAN), 2019, Smart grid case studies: innovative regulatory approaches with focus on experimental sandboxes
Cooper R, 2015, Local Governments and the Sharing Economy: A Roadmap Helping Local Governments Across North America Strategically Engage with the Sharing Economy to Foster More Sustainable Cities
Int. Transp. Forum (ITF), 2017, Shared Mobility: Simulations for Auckland
Chrisafis A., 2016, The Guardian