Posterior Amalgam Restorations—Usage, Regulation, and Longevity

Dental Clinics of North America - Tập 51 - Trang 573-589 - 2007
Richard J. Mitchell1, Mari Koike2, Toru Okabe2
1Division of Restorative Dentistry, Department of Oral Health Practice, College of Dentistry, University of Kentucky, D641 Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536-0297, USA
2Department of Biomaterials Science, Baylor College of Dentistry, The Texas A&M University System Health Science Center, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX 75246-2098, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Berry, 1998, Amalgam at the new millennium, J Am Dent Assoc, 129, 1547, 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0101 Dunne, 1997, Current materials and techniques for direct restorations in posterior teeth. Part 1: silver amalgam, Int Dent J, 47, 123, 10.1002/j.1875-595X.1997.tb00777.x Baghdadi, 2002, Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials, Am J Dent, 15, 54 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 7: possible alternative materials to amalgam for the restoration of posterior teeth, Br Dent J, 183, 11, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809419 Mackert, 2004, Are there acceptable alternatives to amalgam?, J Calif Dent Assoc, 32, 601, 10.1080/19424396.2004.12224008 Roulet, 1997, Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam, J Dent, 25, 459, 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00066-8 Lutz, 1999, Resin composites in the post-amalgam age, Compend Contin Educ Dent, 20, 1138 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 2: mercury exposure in dental practice, Br Dent J, 182, 293, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809370 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 1: dental amalgam structure and corrosion, Br Dent J, 182, 247, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809360 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 3: mercury exposure from amalgam restorations in dental patients, Br Dent J, 182, 333, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809377 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 4: mercury exposure hazards and risk assessment, Br Dent J, 182, 373, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809393 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 5: mercury in the urine, blood and body organs from amalgam fillings, Br Dent J, 182, 413, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809401 Eley, 1997, The future of dental amalgam: a review of the literature. Part 6: possible harmful effects of mercury from dental amalgam, Br Dent J, 182, 455, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809412 Wahl, 2001, Amalgam: resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam, Quintessence Int, 32, 525 Wahl, 2001, Amalgam: resurrection and redemption. Part 2: the medical mythology of anti-amalgam, Quintessence Int, 32, 696 Yip, 2003, Dental amalgam and human health, Int Dent J, 53, 464, 10.1002/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00888.x Mutter, 2004, Amalgam studies: disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity, Int J Hyg Environ Health, 207, 391, 10.1078/1438-4639-00305 Brownawell, 2005, The potential adverse health effects of dental amalgam, Toxicol Rev, 24, 1, 10.2165/00139709-200524010-00001 Mitchell, 2005, Dental amalgam restorations: daily mercury dose and biocompatibility, J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 15, 709, 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v15.i6.120 Kao, 2004, Understanding the mercury reduction issue: the impact of mercury on the environment and human health, J Calif Dent Assoc, 32, 574, 10.1080/19424396.2004.12224004 Horsted Bindslev, 2004, Amalgam toxicity: environmental and occupational hazards, J Dent, 32, 359, 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.002 Johnson, 2001, Dentistry, amalgam, and pollution prevention, J Calif Dent Assoc, 29, 509, 10.1080/19424396.2001.12223199 Osborne, 2002, The use of dental amalgam in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature, Pediatr Dent, 24, 439 Fuks, 2002, The use of amalgam in pediatric dentistry, Pediatr Dent, 24, 448 Burke, 2004, Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials: implications for clinical practice and dental education. Governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results, J Dent, 32, 343, 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.003 del Aguila, 2002, Patterns of oral care in a Washington state dental service population, J Am Dent Assoc, 133, 343, 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0174 Bogacki, 2002, Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database, Oper Dent, 27, 488 Berthold, 2002, Restoratives trend data shows shift in use of materials, ADA News, 33 Mjor, 1998, Teaching class I and class II direct composite restorations: results of a survey of dental schools, J Am Dent Assoc, 129, 1415, 10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0076 Lynch, 2006, Teaching the placement of posterior resin-based composite restorations in U.S. dental schools, J Am Dent Assoc, 137, 619, 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0257 McComb, 2005, Class I and class II silver amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations: teaching approaches in Canadian faculties of dentistry, J Can Dent Assoc, 71, 405 Burke, 2003, Amalgam and composite use in UK general dental practice in 2001, Br Dent J, 194, 613, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810258 Burke, 2001, Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement, J Dent, 29, 317, 10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00022-7 Ylinen, 2002, Nordic dentists' knowledge and attitudes on dental amalgam from health and environmental perspectives, Acta Odontol Scand, 60, 315, 10.1080/00016350260248319 Espelid, 2001, Restorative treatment decisions on occlusal caries in Scandinavia, Acta Odontol Scand, 59, 21, 10.1080/000163501300035724 Swedish National Chemical Inspectorate: Mercury-free dental fillings: phase-out of amalgam in Sweden. KEMI Report Nr 9/05. Sundbyberg, Sweden: Swedish National Chemical Inspectorate; 2005. p. 1–14. Wilson, 2000, The teaching of class I and class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools, J Dent, 28, 15, 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00055-X Lynch, 2006, Teaching of posterior composite resin restorations in undergraduate dental schools in Ireland and the United Kingdom, Eur J Dent Educ, 10, 38, 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00394.x Roeters, 2004, The amalgam-free dental school, J Dent, 32, 371, 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.008 Brennan, 2003, Restorative service trends in private general practice in Australia: 1983–1999, J Dent, 31, 143, 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00010-1 Burke, 2004, Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002, Aust Dent J, 49, 185, 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2004.tb00071.x Qualtrough, 1993, Dental education in Japan, Br Dent J, 174, 111, 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808085 Harada, 1995, Minamata disease: methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution, Crit Rev Toxicol, 25, 1, 10.3109/10408449509089885 Fukushima, 2000, Teaching of posterior composite restorations in Japanese dental schools, Int Dent J, 50, 407, 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00577.x AlNegrish, 2002, Composite resin restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement in Jordan, Int Dent J, 52, 461, 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2002.tb00643.x AlNegrish, 2001, Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan, Int Dent J, 51, 109, 10.1002/j.1875-595X.2001.tb00831.x Gordan, 2000, Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools, Quintessence Int, 31, 735 UNEP Chemicals, 2002 Working Group on Dental Amalgam. Dental amalgam and alternative restorative materials. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1997. Available at: http://www.health.gov/environment/amalgam2/National.html. Accessed May 17, 2007. Swedish National Chemical Inspectorate. Mercury: investigation of a general ban. KEMI Report No 4/04. Sundyberg, Sweden: Swedish National Chemical Inspectorate; 2004. p. 31–43. Mjor, 1990, Longevity of posterior restorations, Int Dent J, 40, 11 Manhart, 2004, Buonocore Memorial Lecture: review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition, Oper Dent, 29, 481 Hickel, 2000, Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations, Am J Dent, 13, 41d Hickel, 2001, Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure, J Adhes Dent, 3, 45 Burke, 2005, Evaluating restorative materials and procedures in dental practice, Adv Dent Res, 18, 46, 10.1177/154407370501800304 Mjor, 2001, The basis for everyday real-life operative dentistry, Oper Dent, 26, 521 Wilson, 1990, The evaluation of materials: relationships between laboratory investigations and clinical studies, Oper Dent, 15, 149 Hondrum, 2000, The longevity of resin-based composite restorations in posterior teeth, Gen Dent, 48, 398 Davies, 1987, Dental restoration longevity: a critique of the life table method of analysis, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 15, 202, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1987.tb00519.x Wilson, 1997, Practice-based research: importance, challenges and prospects. A personal view, Prim Dent Care, 4, 5 Letzel, 1997, The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials, J Dent Res, 76, 1787, 10.1177/00220345970760111101 Osborne, 1980, Dental amalgam: clinical behavior up to eight years, Oper Dent, 5, 24 Doglia, 1986, Clinical evaluation of four amalgam alloys: a five-year report, J Prosthet Dent, 56, 406, 10.1016/0022-3913(86)90378-1 van Dijken, 1991, A six year follow-up of three dental alloy restorations with different copper contents, Swed Dent J, 15, 259 Letzel, 1989, Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial, J Dent, 17, S10, 10.1016/0300-5712(89)90156-5 Letzel, 1989, A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure, Dent Mater, 5, 115, 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90141-3 Osborne, 1990, 13-year clinical assessment of 10 amalgam alloys, Dent Mater, 6, 189, 10.1016/0109-5641(90)90028-D Collins, 1998, A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings, J Dent, 26, 311, 10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00019-5 Dawson, 1992, Restoration longevity in an Australian defence force population, Aust Dent J, 37, 196, 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00742.x Lucarotti, 2005, Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention, J Dent, 33, 805, 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.008 Bjertness, 1990, Survival analysis of amalgam restorations in long-term recall patients, Acta Odontol Scand, 48, 93, 10.3109/00016359009005863 Hawthorne, 1997, Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide, Aust Dent J, 42, 59, 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1997.tb00099.x Smales, 1991, Longevity of low- and high-copper amalgams analyzed by preparation class, tooth site, patient age, and operator, Oper Dent, 16, 162 Gruythuysen, 1996, 15-year evaluation of class II amalgam restorations, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 24, 207, 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1996.tb00843.x Jokstad, 1991, Analyses of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations, Acta Odontol Scand, 49, 47, 10.3109/00016359109041140 Smales, 1991, Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years, Oper Dent, 16, 17 Plasmans, 1998, Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations, J Dent Res, 77, 453, 10.1177/00220345980770030401 Van Nieuwenhuysen, 2003, Long-term evaluation of extensive restorations in permanent teeth, J Dent, 31, 395, 10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00084-8 Robbins, 1988, Longevity of complex amalgam restorations, Oper Dent, 13, 54 Martin, 1997, Five-year treatment outcomes for teeth with large amalgams and crowns, Oper Dent, 22, 72 Smales, 1997, Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns, J Dent, 25, 225, 10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00004-8 Lundin, 1999, Class I and II posterior composite resin restorations after 5 and 10 years, Swed Dent J, 23, 165 Gaengler, 2001, Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report, J Adhes Dent, 3, 185 van Dijken, 2000, Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up, J Dent, 28, 299, 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00010-5 Wilder, 1999, Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations, J Esthet Dent, 11, 135, 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00390.x Pallesen, 2003, Composite resin fillings and inlays: an 11-year evaluation, Clin Oral Investig, 7, 71, 10.1007/s00784-003-0201-z Raskin, 1999, Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report, J Dent, 27, 13, 10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00026-8 da Rosa Rodolpho, 2006, A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings, J Dent, 34, 427, 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.09.006 Opdam, 2004, Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students, J Dent, 32, 379, 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.005 Kohler, 2000, A five-year clinical evaluation of class II composite resin restorations, J Dent, 28, 111, 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00059-7