Positive versus Negative Framing Affects Justice Judgments

Alwin D. F. (1992) Equity theory. In: Borgatta E. F., Borgatta M. L. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sociology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., pp. 563–575

Brickman, P., Folger, R., Goode, E., and Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In Lerner, M. J., and Lerner, S. C. (eds.), The Justice Motive in Social Behavior, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 173–202.

Chang C. J., Yen S. H., Duh R. R. (2002). An empirical investigation of competing theories to explain the framing effect in accounting-related decision. Behav. Res. Accoun. 14:35–64

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Davis M. A., Bobko P. (1986). Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organ. Beh. Hum. Dec. Proc. 7:121–138

Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach goers. Health Psych. 18:189–196

Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? J. Soc. Issues 31:137–150

Deutsch M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

van Dijk E., Engelen M., van Leeuwen E., Monden L., Sluijter E. (1999). Distributive justice and the allocation of costs, losses and profits. Soc. Jus. Res. 12(1):5–18

Elster, J. (1989). Social norms and economic theory. J. Econ. Persp. 3(4):99–117

Elster, J. (1995).The empirical study of justice. In Miller, D., and Walzer, M. (ed.), Pluralism, Justice and Equality, Oxford University Press, pp. 81–89

Goodwin B. (1992). Justice by Lottery. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Jasper, J. D., Goel, R., Einarson, A., Gallo, M., Koren, G. (2001). Effects of framing on teratogenic risk perception in pregnant women. The Lancet 358:1237–1238

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:111–132

Kayser, E., Lamm, H. (1980). Input integration and input weighting in decisions on allocations of gains and losses. Euro. J. Soc. Psych. 10:1–15

Lamm, H., Kayser, E., Schanjz, V. (1983). An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: Ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gains and loss. J. Soc. Psych. 119:269–281

Levin I. P., Gaeth G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J. Consumer Res. 15:374–378

Levin I. P., Gaeth G. J., Schreiber J., Lauriola M. (2002). A new look at framing effects: Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects. Organ. Beh. Hum. Dec. Proc. 88:411–429

Levin I. P., Schneider S. L., Gaeth G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ. Beh. Hum. Dec. Proc. 76:149–188

Lewin-Epstein, N., Kaplan, A., Levanon, A. (2003). Distributive justice and attitudes towards the welfare state. Soc. Jus. Res. 16:1–27

Meyerowitz B. E., Chaiken S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psych. 52:500–510

Miller D. (1976). Social Justice. Oxford: Clarendon

Miller D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press

Sabbagh, C. (2002). A taxonomy of normative and empirically oriented theories of distributive justice. Soc. Jus. Res. 14(3):237–265

Sabbagh, C., Schmidt, M. (1998). Exploring the structure of positive and negative justice judgments. Soc. Jus. Res. 11(4):381–396

Törnblom K. Y. (1988). Positive and negative allocations: A typology and a model for conflicting justice principles. Adv. Group Process 5:141–168

Törnblom, K. Y. (1992). The social psychology of distributive justice. In Scherer, K. R. (ed.), Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–236

Törnblom, K. Y., Ahlin, E. (1998). Mode of accomplishing positive and negative outcomes: Its effect on fairness evaluations. Soc. Jus. Res. 11(4):423–442

Törnblom K.Y., Jonsson D. R. (1985). Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution. Soc. Psych. Quart. 48:249–261

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–458

Zhang, Y., Buda, R. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. J. Advert. 28:1–15