Positive or negative externalities? Exploring the spatial spillover and industrial agglomeration threshold effects of environmental regulation on haze pollution in China

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 23 - Trang 11335-11356 - 2020
Yihang Zhao1, Chen Liang1, Xinlong Zhang2
1School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
2Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Tóm tắt

As one of the efficacious environmental governance instruments, environmental regulations usually have been adopted to control haze pollution in most developing countries. However, as proved in recent researches, the relationship between environmental regulation and haze pollution remains uncertain. This paper develops a conceptual model and attributes this phenomenon to two reasons: the spatial spillover effect and industrial agglomeration threshold effect of effective environmental regulation. Spatial durbin model (SDM), instrumental variable (IV) and panel threshold model are used to estimate these effects based on 277 cities data in China from 2012 to 2016. The results confirm the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations and haze pollution, which could influence the pollutant reduction effect through positive and negative spatial spillover effects. It also validates the thresholds of industrial agglomeration of approximately 0.818 and 1.271. Nevertheless, only 1.271 represents the turning point of the environmental regulation effect changing and environmental regulations could significantly reduce haze, only if it exceeds this numerical value. Moreover, the results have regional heterogeneity regarding spillover effect and threshold effect as well. The environmental regulation intensity in central and western regions plays a “multi-stage promotion” role on haze pollution emission with the adjustment of industrial agglomeration threshold, while it turns out to be a “triple-stage downward” trend in eastern China. At last, we put forward differential policies suggestions according to their industrial agglomeration levels.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bai, J., & Nie, L. (2017). Technological progress and environmental pollution. An inverted U-shaped hypothesis. Research and Development Management, 29(3), 131–140. ((in Chinese)). Blackman, A., Li, Z., & Liu, A. A. (2018). Efficacy of command-and-control and market-based environmental regulation in developing countries. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 10(1), 381–404. Bommer, B. (1999). Environmental policy and industrial competitiveness: the pollution-haven hypothesis reconsidered. Review of International Economics, 7(2), 342–355. Chen, Y., Ebenstein, A., & Greenstone, M. (2013). Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy. PNAS, 110(32), 12936–12941. Chen, Y. J., Li, P., & Lu, Y. (2018). Career concerns and multitasking local bureaucrats: Evidence of a target-based performance evaluation system in China. Journal of Development Economics, 133, 84–101. Cheng, Z. (2016). The spatial correlation and interaction between manufacturing agglomeration and environmental pollution. Ecological Indicators, 61(9), 1024–1032. Chung, S. (2014). Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: evidence from South Korea. Journal of Development Economic, 108, 222–236. Cole, M. A., Elliott, R. J., & Fredriksson, P. G. (2006). Endogenous pollution havens: Does FDI influence environmental regulations? Scandinavian Journal of Economic, 108, 157–178. Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M., & Montini, A. (2013). Environmental performance, innovation and spillovers. Evidence from a regional NAMEA. Ecological Economic, 89, 101–114. Ebenstein, A., Fan, M., & Greenstone, M. (2017). New evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River Policy. PNAS, 114(39), 10384–10389. Elhorse, J. P. (2010). Applied spatial econometrics: Raising the bar. Spatial Economic Analysis, 1, 9–28. Elhorst, J. P. (2015). Matlab software for spatial panels. International Regional Science Review, 37, 389–405. Frank, M. D., Moussiopoulos, N., & Sahm, P. (2001). Urban air quality in larger conurbations in the European Union. Environmental Modelling & Software, 16(4), 399–414. Griffith, D. A., & Paelinck, J. H. P. (2011). Introduction: Spatial econometrics: Non-standard spatial statistics and spatial econometrics (pp. 513–514). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Guo, D., Bose, S., & Alnes, K. (2017). Employment implications of stricter pollution regulation in China: Theories and lessons from the USA. Environment Development and Sustainability, 19(2), 549–569. Gupta, M. R., & Barman, T. R. (2009). Fiscal policies, environmental pollution and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 26(5), 1018–1028. Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368. Hashmi, R., & Alam, K. (2019). Dynamic relationship among environmental regulation, innovation, CO2 emissions, population, and economic growth in OECD countries: a panel investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1100–1109. He, C., Huang, Z., & Ye, X. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity of economic development and industrial pollution in urban China. Stochastic Environmental Research & Risk Assessment, 28, 767–781. Huang, X. F., Li, X., & He, L. Y. (2010). 5-Year study of rainwater chemistry in a coastal mega-city in South China. Atmospheric Research, 97(1–2), 185–193. Kan, H., London, S. J., Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Song, G., & Zhao, N. (2008). Season, sex, age, and education as modifiers of the effects of outdoor air pollution on daily mortality in shanghai, China: The public health and air pollution in Asia study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 116(9), 1183–1188. Keeble, D., Bryson, J., & Wood, P. (1991). Small firm, business services growth and regional development in the United Kingdom: Some empirical finds. Regional Studies, 25(5), 439–457. Konisky, D. M. (2008). Regulator attitudes and the environmental race to the bottom argument. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(2), 321–344. Lan, J., Kakinaka, M., & Huang, X. (2012). Foreign direct investment, human capital and environmental pollution in China. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51(2), 255–275. Lang, J., Zhou, Y., Cheng, S., Zhang, Y., Dong, M., Li, S., et al. (2016). Unregulated pollutant emissions from on-road vehicles in China, 1999–2014. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 974–984. Lin, J., Yu, Z., Wei, Y. D., & Wang, M. (2017). Internet access, spillover and regional development in china. Sustainability, 9, 946. Liu, J., Cheng, Z., & Li, L. (2016). Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution. Science of Resource Management, 37, 134–140. Mani, M., & Wheeler, D. (1998). In search of pollution havens? Dirty industry in the world economy, 1960–1995. Journal of Environment Development, 7, 215–247. Nie, H., Jiang, M., & Wang, X. (2013). The impact of political cycle: Evidence from coalmine accidents in China. Journal of Comparative Economic, 41(4), 995–1011. Pang, R., Zheng, D., Shi, M., & Zhang, X. (2019). Pollute first, control later? Exploring the economic threshold of effective environmental regulation in China’s context. Journal of Environment Management, 248, 109275. Pei, Y., Zhu, Y., Liu, S., & Xie, M. (2020). Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution: Based on the specialized and diversified agglomeration in the Yangtze River Delta. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00756-4. Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives., 9, 97–118. Qian, X., Cai, T., & Li, W. (2011). Promotion pressure, officials’ tenure and lending behavior of city commercial banks. Economic Research Journal, 46(12), 72–85. ((in Chinese)). Qiu, F., Jiang, T., Zhang, C., & Shan, Y. (2013). Spatial relocation and mechanism of pollution-intensive Industries in Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 33, 789–796. ((in Chinese)). Qu, X. (2018). Double effects of heterogeneous environmental regulation on haze pollution. Modern Economic Science., 40, 26–38. ((in Chinese)). Ramanathan, R., He, Q., Black, A., Ghobadian, A., & Gallear, D. (2017). Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 79–92. Ren, W., Zhong, Y., & John, M. (2003). Urbanization, land use, and water quality in Shanghai: 1947–1996. Environment International, 29(5), 649–659. Shao, C., & Su, D. (2017). The spatial spillover effect of global value chain on productivity. China Industrical Economic, 4, 94–114. ((in Chinese)). Shen, N., & Liu, F. (2012). Can intensive environmental regulation promote technological innovation? Porter hypothesis reexamined. China Soft Science, 4, 49–59. ((in Chinese)). Triebswetter, U., & Hitchens, D. (2005). The impact of environmental regulation on competitiveness in the German manufacturing industry: A comparison with other countries of the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 733–745. Tietenberg, T. (1998). Disclosure strategies for pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3–4), 587–602. van Donkelaar, A., R. V. Martin, M. Brauer, N. C. Hsu, R. A. Kahn, R. C. Levy, A. Lyapustin, A. M. Sayer, & D. M. Winker. (2018). Global Annual PM 2.5 Grids from MODIS, MISR and SeaWiFS Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) with GWR, 1998–2016. Palisades, NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). https://doi.org/10.7927/H4ZK5DQS. van Rooij, B., & Lo, C. W. (2010). Fragile convergence: Understanding variation in the enforcement of China’s industrial pollution law. Law Policy, 32, 14–37. Virkanen, J. (1998). Effect of urbanization on metal deposition in the Bay of Töölönlahti, Southern Finland. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 36(9), 729–738. Xia, Y., Guan, D., Jiang, X., Peng, L., Schroeder, H., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Assessment of socioeconomic costs to China’s air pollution. Atmospheric Environment, 139, 147–156. Yang, R. (2013). Industrial agglomeration and regional wage disparity: An empirical study of 269 cities in China. Management World, 8, 41–52. ((in Chinese)). Yang, R. (2015). Industrial agglomeration, foreign direct investment and environmental pollution. Economic Management Journal, 37, 11–19. Yang, R., & Chen, W. (2019). Spatial correlation, influencing factors and environmental supervision mechanism construction of atmospheric pollution: An empirical study on SO2 emissions in China. Sustainability, 11, 1–13. Yu, H., Deng, Y., Lu, Z. N., & Hao, C. (2018). Is environmental regulation effective in China? Evidence from city-level panel data. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 966–976. Yu, Y., Yang, X., & Li, K. (2019). Effects of the terms and characteristics of cadres on environmental pollution: Evidence from 230 cities in china. Journal of Environmental Management, 232(2), 179–187. Walter, I., & Ugelow, J. L. (1979). Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 8, 102–109. Wang, J., Ye, X., & Wei, Y. (2019). Effects of agglomeration, environmental regulations, and technology on pollutant emissions in China: Integrating spatial, social, and economic network analyses. Sustainability, 11, 363. Wang, Y., Yan, W., Ma, D., & Zhang, C. (2018). Carbon emissions and optimal scale of china’s manufacturing agglomeration under heterogeneous environmental regulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176(1), 140–150. Wang, Y., Zhao, T., Wang, J., Guo, F., Kan, X., & Yuan, R. (2019). Spatial analysis on carbon emission abatement capacity at provincial level in China from 1997 to 2014: An empirical study based on SDM model. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 10, 97–104. Wang, Z., Jia, H., Xu, T., & Xu, C. (2018). Manufacturing industrial structure and pollutant emission: An empirical study of china. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(1), 462–471. Wu, J., Xu, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). The impact of governmental performance assessment policy and citizen participation on improving environmental performance across Chinese Provinces. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 227–238. Zhang, K., Xu, D., & Li, S. (2019). The impact of environmental regulation on environmental pollution in China: An empirical study based on the synergistic effect of industrial agglomeration. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(25), 25775–25788. Zhang, K., Xu, D., Li, S., Zhou, N., & Xiong, J. (2019). Has China’s pilot emissions trading scheme influenced the carbon intensity of output? International Journal of Environment Resource Public Health, 16, 1854. Zhang, P., & Wu, J. (2018). Impact of mandatory targets on PM2.5, concentration control in Chinese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 323–331. Zhang, W., & Xu, H. (2016). Exploring the causal relationship between carbon emissions and land urbanization quality in China using a panel data analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19, 1445–1462. Zhao, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2020). Evaluating the effects of campaign-style environmental governance: Evidence from Environmental Protection Interview in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 27, 28333–28347. Zhou, Q., Zhang, X., Shao, Q., & Wang, X. (2019). The non-linear effect of environmental regulation on haze pollution: Empirical evidence for 277 Chinese cities during 2002–2010. Journal of Environmental Management, 248, 109274. Zhou, Q., Shao, Q., Zhang, X., & Chen, J. (2020). Do housing prices promote total factor productivity? Evidence from spatial panel data models in explaining the mediating role of population density. Land Use Policy, 91, 104410.