Port choice problem in a linear city: Application to Manila and Batangas ports in the Philippines

Basso, 2008, Sequential peak-load pricing: the case of airports and airlines, Can. J. Econ., 41, 1087, 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2008.00497.x Da Cruz, 2013, Key factors of seaport competitiveness based on the stakeholder perspective: an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model, Marit. Econ. Logist., 15, 416, 10.1057/mel.2013.14 De Borger, 2006, Prices, capacities, and service levels in a congestible Bertrand duopoly, J. Urban Econ., 60, 264, 10.1016/j.jue.2006.03.001 De Langen, 2007, Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands: the case of Austria, Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res., 7, 1 Feo-Valero, 2011, The importance of the inland leg of containerised maritime shipments: an analysis of modal choice determinants in Spain, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 47, 446, 10.1016/j.tre.2010.11.011 Garcia-Alonso, 2017, Port competition through hinterland accessibility: the case of Spain, Marit. Econ. Logist., 21, 258, 10.1057/s41278-017-0085-5 Ginting, 2015, Economy-wide impact of a more efficient Tanjung Priok port, ADB Pap. Indones., 3 Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2010). Cai Lan port expansion project, https://www2.jica.go.jp/ja/evaluation/pdf/2010_VNIII-1_4_f.pdf (in Japanese). Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (2016). Report on Cai Mep port project for improving port functions, https://openjicareport.jica.go.jp/pdf/12262960.pdf (in Japanese). Ji, 2010, Optimization of two-stage port logistics network of dynamic hinterland based on bi-level programming model, J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol., 10, 89 Kavirathna, 2019, Intra-port coopetition under different combinations of terminal ownership, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 128, 132, 10.1016/j.tre.2019.06.001 Kawasaki, 2019, Effects of incentive policy on maritime stakeholders in Japanese local ports, J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud., 13, 2260 Kawasaki, 2020, The effects of consolidation and privatization of ports in proximity: a case study of the Kobe and Osaka ports, Asian J. Shipp. Logist., 36, 1, 10.1016/j.ajsl.2019.08.002 Kim, 2014, Port user typology and representations of port choice behavior: a Q-methodological study, Marit. Econ. Logist., 16, 165, 10.1057/mel.2013.26 Kramberger, 2015, Port hinterland modelling based on port choice, Traffic Transp., 27, 195 Malchow, 2004, A disaggregate analysis of port selection, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 40, 317, 10.1016/j.tre.2003.05.001 Meers, 2017, Modal choice preferences in short-distance hinterland container transport, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 23, 46, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.02.011 Mueller, 2020, The geography of container port choice: modelling the impact of hinterland changes on port choice, Marit. Econ. Logist., 22, 26, 10.1057/s41278-019-00142-6 Mun, 2012, The organisation of multiple airports in a metropolitan area, J. Transp. Econ. Policy, 46, 221 Notteboom, 2009, Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent gateway ports, Environ. Plan A, 41, 743, 10.1068/a40220 Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) (2018). Quarterly statistical report 2017, Available at https://www.ppa.com.ph/sites/default/files/qtr_stat/2017%20Container%20Statistics.pdf (Accessed in December 2018). Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) (2020). Quarterly statistical report 2019, Available at https://www.ppa.com.ph/sites/default/files/qtr_stat/2019_Container_Statistics_4th.pdf (Accessed in May 2020). Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) (2019). Census of Philippine business and industry, Available at https://psa.gov.ph/statistics/census/business-and-industry (Accessed in May 2020). Omoke, 2018, Determinants of inter-port competition: a case of coastal ports in West Africa, J. Shipp. Ocean Eng., 8, 43 Rezaei, 2019, Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an MCDA approach, Manag. Decis., 57, 396, 10.1108/MD-04-2018-0482 Sheng, 2017, Modeling the effects of unilateral and uniform emission regulations under shipping company and port competition, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 101, 99, 10.1016/j.tre.2017.03.004 Shibasaki, 2017, Network assignment model of integrating maritime and hinterland container shipping: application to Central America, Marit. Econ. Logist., 19, 234, 10.1057/s41278-016-0055-3 Talley, 2017, Hinterland transport chains: determinant effects on chain choice, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 185, 175, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.026 Talley, 2018, Hinterland transport chains: a behavioral examination approach, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 113, 94, 10.1016/j.tre.2018.03.001 Tavasszy, 2011, A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application, J. Transp. Geogr., 19, 1163, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.05.005 Tran, 2018, Feasibility analysis of partial cooperation between government and port in the multiple port system, Transp. Policy Stud. Rev., 20, 30 Trujillo, 2018, Competition vs. cooperation between neighbouring ports: a case study in Chile, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 26, 100, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.03.005 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) (2019). Review of maritime transport 2019. Geneva. Van den Berg, 2011, Hinterland strategies of port authorities: a case study of the port of Barcelona, Res. Transp. Econ., 33, 6, 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.08.002 Veldman, 2016, Testing port choice models using physical and monetary data: a comparative case study for the Spanish container trades, Marit. Policy Manag., 43, 495, 10.1080/03088839.2015.1099754 Wang, 2016, Delimiting port hinterlands based on intermodal network flows: model and algorithm, Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev., 88, 32, 10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.004 2011 Yin, 2014, Slow steaming of liner trade: its economic and environmental impacts, Marit. Policy Manag., 41, 149, 10.1080/03088839.2013.821210 Zondag, 2010, Port competition modeling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics, Marit. Policy Manag., 37, 179, 10.1080/03088831003700579