Pornography and civil rights: The liberal case against pornography

Res Publica - Tập 2 - Trang 205-214 - 1996
Andrea Baumeister1
1Department of Politics, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

Tài liệu tham khảo

B. William,Obscenity and Film Censorship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), and Ronald Dworkin, “Do we have a Right to Pornography”, inA Matter of Principle (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), 335–72. See, for example, R. Dworkin's critique of MacKinnon in R. Dworkin, “Women and Pornography”,New York Review of Books, 21 st October 1993, 36–42. Supra n. 2. See, for example, R. Dworkin's critique of MacKinnon in R. Dworkin, “Women and Pornography”,New York Review of Books, 21st October 1993, 36–42. C. Pateman,The Sexual Contrast (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1988), and I. M. Young,Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990). I.M. Young, “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship”,Ethics 99 (1989), 250–75, at 262. J.S. Mill,Utilitarianism (London: Dent & Sons Ltd, 1972), 8. V. Haskar,Equality, Liberty and Perfectionism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979) and R. Lindley,Autonomy (London: Macmillan, 1986). R. Dworkin, “Pornography: An Exchange”,New York Review of Books 3rd March 1994, 48–49.