Policy options for strengthening evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: overall SASHA project findings

Reza Majdzadeh1, Haniye Sadat Sajadi2, Bahareh Yazdizadeh3, Leila Doshmangir4, Elham Ehsani-Chimeh5, Mahdi Mahdavi5, Neda Mehrdad6,7, John Lavis8,9, Sima Nikooee3, Farideh Mohtasham3, Mahsa Mohseni3, Paria Akbari3, Mohammad Hossein Asgardoon3, Niloofar Rezaei10, Narges Neyazi11,12, Saeideh Ghaffarifar13, Ali Akbar Haghdoost14, Rahim Khodayari-Zarnaq4, Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad15, Ata Pourabbasi7, Javad Rafinejad16, Reza Toyserkanamanesh17
1Community Based Participatory Research Center, Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Knowledge Utilization Research Center, University Research and Development Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Knowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Health policy and Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6Nursing Care Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
7Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
8McMaster Health Forum and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
9Africa Centre for Evidence, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
10School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
11International Campus, School of Public Health, Health Economics and Management Department, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
12Trusted Organization for Research and Development, Kabul, Afghanistan
13Medical Education Research Center, Health Management and Safety Promotion Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
14HIV/STI Surveillance Research Center and WHO Collaborating Center for HIV Surveillance Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
15School of Public Health, Health Information Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
16Department of Medical Entomology and Vector Control, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
17Department of Treatment and Social Support, IRAN Drug Control Headquarter, Tehran, Iran

Tóm tắt

The institutionalization of evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP) is complex and complicated. It is complex because it has many players and is complicated because its institutionalization will require many changes that will be challenging to make. Like many other issues, strengthening EIHP needs a road map, which should consider challenges and address them through effective, harmonized and contextualized strategies. This study aims to develop a road map for enhancing EIHP in Iran based on steps of planning. This study consisted of three phases: (1) identifying barriers to EIHP, (2) recognizing interventions and (3) measuring the use of evidence in Iran's health policy-making. A set of activities was established for conducting these, including foresight, systematic review and policy dialogue, to identify the current and potential barriers for the first phase. For the second phase, an evidence synthesis was performed through a scoping review, by searching the websites of benchmark institutions which had good examples of EIHP practices in order to extract and identify interventions, and through eight policy dialogues and two broad opinion polls to contextualize the list of interventions. Simultaneously, two qualitative-quantitative studies were conducted to design and use a tool for assessing EIHP in the third phase. We identified 97 barriers to EIHP and categorized them into three groups, including 35 barriers on the “generation of evidence” (push side), 41 on the “use of evidence” (pull side) and 21 on the “interaction between these two” (exchange side). The list of 41 interventions identified through evidence synthesis and eight policy dialogues was reduced to 32 interventions after two expert opinion polling rounds. These interventions were classified into four main strategies for strengthening (1) the education and training system (6 interventions), (2) the incentives programmes (7 interventions), (3) the structure of policy support organizations (4 interventions) and (4) the enabling processes to support EIHP (15 interventions). The policy options developed in the study provide a comprehensive framework to chart a path for strengthening the country’s EIHP considering both global practices and the context of Iran. It is recommended that operational plans be prepared for road map interventions, and the necessary resources provided for their implementation. The implementation of the road map will require attention to the principles of good governance, with a focus on transparency and accountability.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo