Policy Approaches For Sustainable Conservation Of Built Heritage Using Transfer Of Development Rights: International Comparison

Sustainable Development - Tập 25 Số 6 - Trang 528-545 - 2017
Jun Hou1, Edwin H.W. Chan2
1School of Architecture and Arts, HeFei University of Technology, China
2Building and Real Estate Department, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong S.A.R, China

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe important factors for successfully implementing transfer of development rights (TDR) programs have been explored. However, these factors are not yet adequate to guide the practice directly, especially for those cities at the early stage of exploring TDR. This research aims to find out how different cities/counties put these successful factors into practice to achieve sustainable conservation of built heritage by adopting a successful TDR framework to conduct a systematic comparison of 15 cities/counties internationally. The research identifies six key factors included in most policy approaches in practice. Interviews are carried out with local experts in Hong Kong as a case study to understand how these factors can be implemented in the local context. Through coding of the interview data using NVivo, the analyses also show how these factors are interrelated to each other. The results have not only contributed to better understanding of the theory of implementing TDR in general, but also provided useful guidance for sustainable TDR practice. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

ArnoldCSJ.1992.Transferable development rights: a planning tool for the preservation of heritage buildings (doctoral dissertation University of Queensland).

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(200002)8:1<51::AID-SD125>3.0.CO;2-6

Bruening AD, 2008, TDR siren song: the problems with transferable development rights programs and how to fix them, Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 23, 423

10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.018

10.1002/sd.350

City of Vancouver website.2016.http://vancouver.ca/home‐property‐development/density‐incentives‐for‐developers.aspx[April 2016].

10.2307/1339624

Fulton W, 2004, TDRs and Other Market‐Based Land Mechanisms: How they Work and their Role in Shaping Metropolitan Growth

Huang RS, 2010, A Tool for Solving Land Use Conflicts? A Study in TDR in Taiwan

10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.002

Jin GJ, 2010, Discussion on Taiwan transfer of development right institution, Urban Planning International, 25, 104

10.1080/01944369708975929

10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.07.004

10.1002/sd.419

King County website.2016.Definitions – Transfer of Development Rights.http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/stewardship/sustainable‐building/transfer‐development‐rights.aspx[April 2016].

Legislative Council Panel (LCP) on Development Progress Report on Heritage Conservation Initiatives.2015. CB(1)987/14–15(05).

10.1108/20441261311317383

Machemer PL, 1998, Transferable development rights as a growth management technique in landscape management: a case study approach Washington

10.1080/0964056022000024334

Nelson AC, 2011, The TDR Handbook: Designing and Implementing Transfer of Development Rights Programs

10.1080/15480755.2007.10394447

10.1080/01944360802565627

Spaans M, 2010, The concept of non‐financial compensation: what is it, which forms can be distinguished and what can it mean in spatial terms? Planum January 2010

Stinson JD, 1996, Transferring development rights: purpose, problems, and prospects in New York, Pace Law Review, 17, 319, 10.58948/2331-3528.1322

10.1002/sd.482

10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.12.004

10.1002/sd.429

Xie QQ, 2006, Tai wan rong ji yi zhuan zhi du de qian zai kai fa qu wei te xing‐tai zhong shi ge an yan jiu, Hua gang di li xue bao, 19, 39

10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.12.004

10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.11.001

10.1002/sd.534

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Sustainable Development

Tập 25 Số 6

528-545

Thông tin tác giả