Police officers' assessment of operational situations

Policing - Tập 30 Số 2 - Trang 310-323 - 2007
R.Flin1, Z.Pender1, L.Wujec1, V.Grant1, E.Stewart2
1School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
2Grampian Police, Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe aim of this study is to identify the dimensions used by police officers in Scotland to discriminate and categorise operational situations.Design/methodology/approachThis article was based on two studies: study 1 was a card‐sorting task: 23 officers categorised a set of 19 typical police operational situations, analysed using multi‐dimensional scaling; study 2 was a judgement task: 112 police officers rated 20 situations (19 from study1) in terms of amount of time to make a decision, risk to self, risk to others, familiarity and stress. Frequency data and correlations were calculated.FindingsStudy 1 results showed that the two main dimensions used to discriminate between situations were “familiarity” and “risk to the officer”. Study 2 found that most situations required a decision in less than three minutes. Rank and experience were related to familiarity but not to the other judgements. The situations requiring the fastest decisions were also judged to be of higher risk and more unfamiliar. Risks to self and to others were highly correlated, and higher risk situations were judged as more stressful.Research limitations/implicationsThis preliminary study shows that knowledge elicitation techniques can be used to improve our understanding of police officers' knowledge and cognitive skills for operational policing.Practical implicationsGood situational judgements form the basis of effective operational decision‐making. Understanding how officers “read” situations and how this develops with expertise can provide valuable information for police training and critical incident management.Originality/valuePolice officers' cognitive skills have rarely been studied in relation to routine operational policing. This study is a first attempt to examine situational judgement skills.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Banbury, S. and Tremblay, S. (Eds.) (2004), A Cognitive Approach to Situation Awareness: Theory and Application, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Brown, J. and Campbell, E. (1994), Stress and Policing, Wiley, Chichester.

Burke, E. and Hendry, C. (1997), “Decision making on the London incident ground”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 40‐7.

Cannon, L. (1998), Official Negligence. How Rodney King and the Riots Changed Los Angeles and the LAPD, Times Books, New York, NY.

Cohen, M. and Freeman, J. (1997), “Improving critical thinking”, in Flin, R., Salas, E., Strub, M. and Martin, L. (Eds), Decision Making Under Stress, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Crandall, B., Klein, G. and Hoffman, R. (2006), Working Minds. A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis, Bradford Books, Cambridge, MA.

Crichton, M. and Flin, R. (2002), “Command decision making”, in Flin, R. and Arbuthnot, K. (Eds), Incident Command. Tales from the Hot Seat, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Crichton, M., Flin, R. and McGeorge, P. (2005), “Decision making by on‐scene commanders in nuclear emergencies”, Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol. 7, pp. 156‐66.

Crichton, M., Flin, R. and Rattray, W. (2002), “Training decision makers – tactical decision games”, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, Vol. 8, pp. 208‐17.

Crego, J. and Harris, C. (2002), “Training decision making by team based simulation”, in Flin, R. and Arbuthnot, K. (Eds), Incident Command. Tales from the Hot Seat, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Endsley, M. (1995), “Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems”, Human Factors, Vol. 37, pp. 32‐64.

Endsley, M. and Garland, D. (Eds.) (2000), Situation Awareness, LEA, Mahwah, NJ.

Fischer, U., Orasanu, J. and Wich, M. (1995) in Jensen, D. (Ed.), “Expert pilots' perceptions of problem situations”, In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Flin, R. and Maran, N. (2004), “Identifying and training non‐technical skills in acute medicine”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 13, Suppl 1, pp. i180‐i184.

Flin, R., Salas, E., Strub, M. and Martin, L. (Eds.) (1997), Decision Making Under Stress, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Gladwell, M. (2005), Blink. The Power of Thinking without Thinking, Allen Lane, New York, NY.

Jensen, R. (1995), Pilot Judgment and Crew Resource Management, Avebury Aviation, Aldershot.

Klein, G. (1998), Sources of Power. How People Make Decisions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Kruskal, J. and Wish, M. (1978), Multidimensional Scaling, Sage, Beverley Hills, CA.

Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., Orasanu, J. and Salas, E. (2001), “Taking stock of naturalistic decision making”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 14, pp. 331‐52.

Loree, D. (1995), Violent Incidents, Canadian Police Research Centre. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Delta, Technical Report‐05‐98E, April.

Moore, T. (2002), “Police commander – the Notting Hill Riot”, in Flin, R. and Arbuthnot, K. (Eds), Incident Command. Tales from the Hot Seat, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Niessen, C., Eyferth, K. and Bierwagens, T. (1999), “Modelling cognitive processes of experienced air traffic controllers”, Ergonomics, Vol. 42, pp. 1507‐20.

Orasanu, J., Dismukes, K. and Fischer, U. (1993), “Decision errors in the cockpit”. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37th Annual meeting, Seattle, October, HFES, San Diego, CA.

Orasanu, J. and Fischer, U. (1997), “Finding decisions in natural environments: the view from the cockpit”, in Zsambok, C. and Klein, G. (Eds), Naturalistic Decision Making, LEA, Mahwah, NJ.

Rugg, M. and McGeorge, P. (1997), “The sorting techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts”, Expert Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 80‐93.

Sarna, P. (2002), “Managing the spike: the command perspective in critical incidents”, in Flin, R. and Arbuthnot, K. (Eds), Incident Command. Tales from the Hot Seat, Ashgate, Aldershot.

Stewart, E. and Flin, R. (1996), “Taking action”, Policing Today, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 14‐17.

Sykes, R., Brent, E. and Policing, A. (1983), Social Behaviourist Perspective, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

Takane, Y., Young, F. and Leeuw, J. (1977), “Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: an alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features”, Psychometrika, Vol. 42, pp. 7‐67.

Taylor, P. (1990), The Hillborough Stadium Disaster, Final Report, HMSO, London.

Vrij, A., van der Steer, J. and Koppelaar, L. (1995), “The effects of physical effort on police officers' perception and aggression in simulated shooting incidents”, Psychology, Crime & Law, Vol. 1, pp. 301‐8.

Zsambok, C. and Klein, G. (Eds.) (1997), Naturalistic Decision Making, LEA, Mahwah, NJ.

Fischer, U., Davison, J. and Orasanu, J. (2003) in Jensen, R. (Ed.), “What makes flight situations risky? Examining commercial and general aviation pilots' concepts of risk”, In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Orasanu, J. (1993), “Decision making in the cockpit”, in Wiener, E., Kanki, B. and Helmreich, R. (Eds), Cockpit Resource Management, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Policing

Tập 30 Số 2

310-323

Thông tin tác giả