Plant community composition as a driver of decomposition dynamics in riparian wetlands

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 24 - Trang 335-346 - 2015
A. Britson1,2, D. Wardrop1,2, P. Drohan1,3
1Intercollegiate Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
2Department of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
3Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA

Tóm tắt

Riparian wetlands are well known for providing the important ecosystem service of carbon storage. However, changes in land-use regimes surrounding riparian wetlands have been shown to result in alterations to the wetland plant community. These plant community changes have the potential to alter litter quality, decomposition rates, and ultimately the capacity of riparian wetlands to store carbon. To determine the effects of plant community shifts associated with disturbance on decomposition and carbon inputs, we performed a yearlong decomposition experiment using in situ herbaceous material, leaf litter, and control litter and examined biomass inputs in six headwater riparian wetlands in central Pennsylvania. Two sites were classified as Hemlock-Mixed Hardwood Palustrine Forest, two were classified as Broadleaf Palustrine Forest, and two were classified as Reed Canary Grass-Floodplain Grassland (Zimmerman et al. 2012). Plant matter with greater initial percent C, percent lignin, and lignin:N ratios decomposed more slowly while plant matter with greater initial cellulose decomposed more quickly. However, no significant differences were found between plant community types in decomposition rate or amount of carbon remaining at the end of the experiment, indicating that the differences in plant community type did not have a large impact on decomposition in riparian wetlands. This work has important implications for studies that examine the decomposition dynamics of a few select species, as they may not capture the decomposition dynamics of the plant community and thus extrapolating results from these studies to the larger ecosystem may be inappropriate.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aerts R, de Caluwe H (1997) Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of carex species. Ecology 78:244–260 Atkinson RB, Cairns J (2001) Plant decomposition and litter accumulation in depressional wetlands: functional performance of two wetland age classes that were created via excavation. Wetlands 21:354–362 Benfield EF (1996) Leaf breakdown in stream ecosystems. In: Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 579–589 Berg B, McClaugherty C (2008) Chemical constituents as rate-regulating: initial variation and changes during decomposition. In: Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 115–148 Berkowitz JF, White JR (2013) Linking wetland functional rapid assessment models with quantitative hydrological and biogeochemical measurements across a restoration chronosequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 77:1442 Bischel-Machung L, Brooks R, Yates S, Hoover K (1996) Soil properties of reference wetlands and wetland creation projects in Pennsylvania. Wetlands 16:532–541 Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916 Brooks R, Brinson M, Wardrop D, Bishop J (2013) Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) classification, inventory, and reference wetlands. In: Brooks R, Wardrop D (eds) Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice. Springer, New York, pp 39–60 Chamberlain S, Wardrop D, Fennessy S, DeBerry D (2013) Hydrophytes in the Mid-Atlantic region: an overview. In: Brooks R, Wardrop D (eds) Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice. Springer, New York, pp 159–258 Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071 Davis SM (1991) Growth, decomposition, and nutrient retention of Cladium jamaicense Crantz and Typha domingensis Pers. in the Florida Everglades. Aquat Bot 40:203–224 Ehrenfeld JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503–523 Emery SL, Perry JA (1996) Decomposition rates and phosphorus concentrations of purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and Cattail (Typha spp.) in fourteen Minnesota wetlands. Hydrobiologia 323:129–138 Enriquez S, Duarte CM, Sand-Jensen K (1993) Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of detritus C:N:P content. Oecologia 94:457–471 Franklin SB, Kupfer JA, Pezeshki R, Gentry R, Smith RD (2009) Efficacy of the hydrogeomorphic model (HGM): a case study from western Tennessee. Ecol Indic 9:267–283 Freschet GT, Aerts R, Cornelissen JHC (2012) A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability. Funct Ecol 26:56–65 Howe A, Rodríguez JF, Saco PM (2009) Surface evolution and carbon sequestration in disturbed and undisturbed wetland soils of the Hunter estuary, southeast Australia. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 84:75–83 Jordan TE, Andrews MP, Szuch RP, Whigham DF, Weller DE, Jacobs AD (2007) Comparing functional assessments of wetlands to measurements of soil characteristics and nitrogen processing. Wetlands 27:479–497 Kittle DL, McGraw JB, Garbutt K (1995) Plant litter decomposition in wetlands receiving acid mine drainage. J Environ Qual 24:301–306 Lee KH, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2003) Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. J Soil Water Conserv 58:1–8 Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y, Zhou X, Wu X, Fang C, Chen J, Li B (2007) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714 Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang M (2008) Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis. J Environ Qual 37:1667–1674 Mahaney W, Wardrop D, Brooks R (2004) Impacts of stressors on the emergence and growth of wetland plant species in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 24:538–549 Madigan M, Martinko J, Dunlap P, Clark D (2009) Brock biology of microorganisms, 12th edn. Benjamin Cummings, Pearson Menon R, Holland MM (2014) Phosphorus release due to decomposition of wetland plants. Wetlands 34:1191–1196 Miller SJ, Wardrop DH (2006) Adapting the floristic quality assessment index to indicate anthropogenic disturbance in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Ecol Ind 6:313–326 Miller JN, Brooks RP, Croonquist MJ (1997) Effects of landscape patterns on biotic communities. Landsc Ecol 12:137–153 Mitsch W, Gosselink J (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New York Moon J, Wadrop D (2013) Linking landscapes to wetland condition: a case study of eight headwater complexes in Pennsylvania. In: Brooks R, Wardrop D (eds) Mid-Atlantic freshwater wetlands: advances in wetland science, management, policy, and practice. Springer, New York, pp 61–108 Prescott CE (2010) Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? Biogeochemistry 101:133–149 Stewart CE (2012) Evaluation of angiosperm and fern contributions to soil organic matter using two methods of pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plant Soil 351:31–46 Wardrop DH, Brooks RP (1998) The occurence and impact of sedimentation in central Pennsylvania wetlands. Environ Monit Assess 51:119–130 Wardrop DH, Kentula ME, Jensen SF, Stevens DL, Hychka KC, Brooks RP (2007a) Assessment of wetlands in the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA using the hydrogeomorphic approach. Wetlands 27:432–445 Wardrop DH, Kentula ME, Stevens DL, Jensen SF, Brooks RP (2007b) Assessment of wetland condition: an example from the Upper Juniata watershed in Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 27:416–431 Williamson J, Mills G, Freeman C (2010) Species-specific effects of elevated ozone on wetland plants and decomposition processes. Environ Pollut 158:1197–1206 Yanni S, Whalen J, Simpson M, Janzen H (2011) Plant lignin and nitrogen contents control carbon dioxide production and nitrogen mineralization in soils incubated with Bt and non-Bt corn residues. Soil Biol Biochem 43(1):63–69 Zimmerman E, T Davis, G Podniesinski, M Furedi, J McPherson, S Seymour, B Eichelberger, N Dewar, J Wagner, J Fike (eds) (2012) Terrestrial and Palustrine plant communities of Pennsylvania, 2nd edn. Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania