Planetary Boundaries and the Doughnut frameworks: A review of their local operability

Anthropocene - Tập 39 - Trang 100347 - 2022
Anna Ferretto1,2,3, Robin Matthews2, Rob Brooker2, Pete Smith1
1School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, AB24 3UU, United Kingdom
2The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, United Kingdom
3Institute of Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT, 82467 Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amsterdam City (2020), The Amsterdam City Doughnut - A tool for transformative action. Amsterdam. Andersen, 2020, 66 Biermann, 2012, Planetary Boundaries and earth system governance: exploring the links, Ecol. Econ., 81, 4, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.016 Bogardi, 2013, Planetary Boundaries revisited: a view through the ‘water lens’, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 581, 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.006 Bruneau, P.M.C. and Johnson, S.M. (2014). SNH Commissioned Report 701: Scotland’s peatland - definitions & information resources. Retrieved from https://www.nls.uk/e-monographs/2014/701.pdf. Bunsen, 2021, Planetary boundaries for water–a review, Ecol. Indic., 121, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107022 Cole, 2014, Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled “safe and just space” framework, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, E4399, 10.1073/pnas.1400985111 Cole, 2017, Spatial variability in sustainable development trajectories in South Africa: provincial level safe and just operating spaces, Sustain. Sci., 12, 829, 10.1007/s11625-016-0418-9 Crutzen, 2002, Geology of mankind, Nature, 415, 23, 10.1038/415023a Dao, Q.H., Peduzzi, P., Chatenoux, B., De Bono, A., Schwarzer, S., Friot, D. 2015, Environmental limits and Swiss footprints based on Planetary Boundaries. Dearing, 2014, Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems, Glob. Environ. Change, 28, 227, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.012 Dieleman, 2015, Climate change drives a shift in peatland ecosystem plant community: implications for ecosystem function and stability, Glob. Change Biol., 21, 388, 10.1111/gcb.12643 Downing, 2019, Matching scope, purpose and uses of Planetary Boundaries science, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 10.1088/1748-9326/ab22c9 Drees, 2021, Necessary or oversimplification? On the strengths and limitations of current assessments to integrate social dimensions in planetary boundaries, Ecol. Indic., 129, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108009 Eppinga, 2009, Linking habitat modification to catastrophic shifts and vegetation patterns in bogs, Plant Ecol., 200, 53, 10.1007/s11258-007-9309-6 Fang, 2015, Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint–boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework, Ecol. Econ., 114, 218, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.008 Folke, 2004, Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management, Annu. Rev. Ecol., Evol., Syst., 35, 557, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Folke, C., Nilsson, M., & Olsson, P. (2012). Global environmental governance and planetary boundaries: an introduction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.023. Galloway, 2008, Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions, Sci. (N. Y., N. Y. ), 320, 10.1126/science.1136674 Gleeson, 2020, The water planetary boundary: interrogation and revision, One Earth, 2, 223, 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009 Green, 2017, Creating a safe operating space for wetlands in a changing climate, Front. Ecol. Environ., 15, 99, 10.1002/fee.1459 Groffman, 2006, Ecological thresholds: The key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application, Ecosystems, 9(1), 10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z Gunderson, 2000, Ecological resilience--in theory and application, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 31, 425, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.425 Häyhä, 2016, From Planetary Boundaries to national fair shares of the global safe operating space—How can the scales be bridged?, Glob. Environ. Change, 40, 60, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.008 Häyhä, T., Cornell, S.E., Hoff, H., Lucas, P., & van Vuuren, D. (2018). Operationalizing the concept of a safe operating space at the EU level—First steps and explorations (Stockholm Resilience Centre Technical Report, prepared in collaboration with Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) and PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency). Stockholm University, Sweden: Stockholm Resilience Centre. Hjalsted, 2021, Sharing the safe operating space: exploring ethical allocation principles to operationalize the planetary boundaries and assess absolute sustainability at individual and industrial sector levels, J. Ind. Ecol., 25, 6, 10.1111/jiec.13050 Hoekstra, A.Y.and Mekonnen, M.M. 2012, "The water footprint of humanity", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3232–3237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109. Hoff, H., Nykvist, B., Carson, M. 2015, Living well, within the limits of our planet? Measuring Europe’s growing external footprint. Hoornweg, 2016, An urban approach to planetary boundaries, Ambio, 45, 567, 10.1007/s13280-016-0764-y Hossain, 2020, Challenges and opportunities for operationalizing the safe and just operating space concept at regional scale, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 27, 40, 10.1080/13504509.2019.1683645 Houdini (2018). Planetary Boundaries assessment 2018. Retrieved from: https://api.houdinisportswear.com/storage/2A69199BFCBA925CC9260D61F41301EA566C760FB9A727B5DABB2C330C13D1BC/08df8496f36f49f0bb821fdeafdd775e/pdf/media/e5eec5e201b242e9a2aa14aba9c3b696/Houdini_Planetary_Boundaries_Assessment_2018.pdf. Humpenöder, 2020, Peatland protection and restoration are key for climate change mitigation, Environ. Res. Lett., 15, 10.1088/1748-9326/abae2a IPCC. (2013). IPCC, 2013: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press. Jonas, 2014, Sustaining ecosystem services: Overcoming the dilemma posed by local actions and Planetary Boundaries, Earth'S. Future, 2, 407, 10.1002/2013EF000224 Lade, 2020, Human impacts on planetary boundaries amplified by Earth system interactions, Nat. Sustain., 3, 119, 10.1038/s41893-019-0454-4 Leach, 2012, A nitrogen footprint model to help consumers understand their role in nitrogen losses to the environment, Environ. Dev., 1, 40, 10.1016/j.envdev.2011.12.005 Lenzen, 2012, International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations, Nature, 486, 109, 10.1038/nature11145 Limpens, 2003, N deposition affects N availability in interstitial water, growth of Sphagnum and invasion of vascular plants in bog vegetation, N. Phytol., 157, 339, 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00667.x Lucas, 2020, Allocating planetary boundaries to large economies: distributional consequences of alternative perspectives on distributive fairness, Glob. Environ. Change, 60, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102017 Mace, 2014, Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity, Glob. Environ. Change, 28, 289, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009 McLaughlin, 2018, Safe operating space for humanity at a regional scale, Ecol. Soc., 23, 10.5751/ES-10171-230243 Meyer, 2018, The planetary accounting framework: a novel, quota-based approach to understanding the impacts of any scale of human activity in the context of the Planetary Boundaries, Sustain Earth, 1, 4, 10.1186/s42055-018-0004-3 Lucas, P. and Wilting, H., 2018. Using Planetary Boundaries to Support National Implementation of Environmental-Related Sustainable Development Goals’. 2748. The Hague: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003). Ecosystems and their services. Chapter 2 in Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington, D.C: Island Press. Newbold, 2016, Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment, Science, 353, 288, 10.1126/science.aaf2201 Nilsson, 2012, Can earth system interactions be governed? Governance functions for linking climate change mitigation with land use, freshwater and biodiversity protection, Ecol. Econ., 75, 61, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.12.015 Nykvist, B., Persson, Å., Moberg, F., Persson, L., Cornell, S., Rockström, J., (2013). National environmental performance on Planetary Boundaries: a study for the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm. O’Neill, 2018, A good life for all within Planetary Boundaries, Nat. Sustain., 1, 88, 10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 Paris Agreement [Treaty no XXVII-7] (2015). UN Treaty. United Nations. Retrieved July 27, 2022, from https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XXVII-7-d&chapter=27&clang=_en. Persson, 2022, Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 1510, 10.1021/acs.est.1c04158 Persson, L.M., Breitholtz, M., Cousins, I.T., de Wit, C.A., MacLeod, M., McLachlan, M.S. (2013). Confronting unknown planetary boundary threats from chemical pollution. https://doi.org/10.1021/es402501c. Priyadarshini, 2020, Exploring the ‘safe operating space’of India for the implementation of UN-sustainable development Goals through effectual policy alignment, Sustain. Sci., 15, 1149, 10.1007/s11625-020-00810-0 Raworth, K. (2012). A safe and just space for humanity: can we live within the Doughnut? Oxfam. Rockström, 2009, A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461, 472, 10.1038/461472a Rockström, 2009, Planetary Boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity, Ecol. Soc., 14, 10.5751/ES-03180-140232 Running, 2012, A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere, Science, 337, 1458, 10.1126/science.1227620 Sala, 2013, Chemical footprint: a methodological framework for bridging life cycle assessment and planetary boundaries for chemical pollution, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., vol. 9, 623, 10.1002/ieam.1471 Sayers, M., Trebeck, K. and Stuart, F. 2014, The Scottish Doughnut: A safe and just operating space for Scotland. Oxfam GB. Scheffer, 2003, Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: Linking theory to observation, Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 648, 10.1016/j.tree.2003.09.002 Scheffer, 2001, Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591, 10.1038/35098000 Scheffer, 2015, Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems, Science, 347, 1317, 10.1126/science.aaa3769 Scholes, 2005, A biodiversity intactness index, Nature, 434, 45, 10.1038/nature03289 Steffen, W., Sanderson, A., Tyson, P.D., Jager, J., Matson, P.A., Moore III, B., Oldfield, F., Richardson, K., Schellnhuber, H.J., Turner II, B.L.. & Wasson, R.J. (2006). Global change and the earth system: A planet under pressure. Springer Science & Business Media. Steffen, 2015, The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration, Anthr. Rev., 2, 81 Steffen, 2015, Planetary Boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347, 10.1126/science.1259855 Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T.M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., Summerhayes, C.P., Barnosky, A.D., Cornell, S.E., Crucifix, M., Donges, J.F., Fetzer, I., Lade, S.J., Scheffer, M., Winkelmann, R. Schellnhuber, H.J. (2018). Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115. Tylianakis, 2008, Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems, Ecol. Lett., 11, 1351, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x United Nations, 2015. “Sustainable Development Goals. 17 Goals to transform our world.” Downloaded August 2018 from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). Vanham, 2019, Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs, Sci. Total Environ., 693, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.133642 Vargas, 2018, Linking planetary boundaries and ecosystem accounting, with an illustration for the Colombian Orinoco river basin, Reg. Environ. Change, 18, 1521, 10.1007/s10113-018-1282-1 Villarrubia-Gómez, 2018, Marine plastic pollution as a planetary boundary threat–the drifting piece in the sustainability puzzle, Mar. Policy, 96, 213, 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.035 Wang, 2011, The phosphorus footprint of China's food chain: implications for food security, natural resource management, and environmental quality, J. Environ. Qual., 40, 1081, 10.2134/jeq2010.0444 Weinzettel, 2013, Affluence drives the global displacement of land use, Glob. Environ. Change, 23, 433, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.010 Wiedmann, 2008, A definition of ‘carbon footprint’, Ecol. Econ. Res. Trends, 1, 1 Zhang, 2022, Bridging planetary boundaries and spatial heterogeneity in a hybrid approach: a focus on Chinese provinces and industries, Sci. Total Environ., 804, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150179 Zipper, 2020, Integrating the water planetary boundary with water management from local to global scales, Earth'S. Future, 8, 10.1029/2019EF001377