Placing sustainability at the centre of water, sanitation and hygiene: Knowledge co-production for sectoral transformation

Abson, 2017, Leverage points for sustainability transformation, Ambio, 46, 30, 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y Arnott, 2021, Understanding knowledge use for sustainability, Environ. Sci. Pol., 120, 222, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.016 Blythe, 2018, The dark side of transformation: latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse, Antipode, 50, 1206, 10.1111/anti.12405 Bradbury, 2020, Action methods for faster transformation: relationality in action, Action Res., 18, 273, 10.1177/1476750320936493 Bréthaut, 2019, Power dynamics and integration in the water-energy-food nexus: learning lessons for transdisciplinary research in Cambodia, Environ. Sci. Pol., 94, 153, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.01.010 Carrard, 2017, Environmentally sustainable WASH? Current discourse, planetary boundaries and future directions, J. Water Sanit. Hyg. Dev., 7, 209, 10.2166/washdev.2017.130 Carrard, 2019, Groundwater as a source of drinking water in Southeast Asia and the Pacific: a multi-country review of current reliance and resource concerns, Water (Switzerland), 11 Carrard, 2021, Life-cycle costs of a resource-oriented sanitation system and implications for advancing a circular economy approach to sanitation, J. Clean. Prod., 307, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127135 Cerf, 2019, Sustainable development goal integration, interdependence, and implementation: the environment–economic–health nexus and universal health coverage, Glob. Challenge., 3, 1900021, 10.1002/gch2.201900021 Chambers, 2021, Six modes of co-production for sustainability, Nat. Sustain., 49 Creswell, 2000, Determining validity in qualitative inquiry, Theory Pract., 39, 124, 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2 Cumming, 2018 Fritz, 2020, Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research, Eur. J. Futur. Res., 8 Hargrove, 2019, Global aid in the water sector: a descriptive analysis of international development effectiveness, Int. J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 7, 19, 10.11114/ijsss.v7i2.3874 Hedlund-de Witt, 2012, Exploring worldviews and their relationships to sustainable lifestyles: towards a new conceptual and methodological approach, Ecol. Econ., 84, 74, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.009 Hedlund-de Witt, 2014, Rethinking sustainable development: considering how different worldviews envision “development” and “quality of life.”, Sustain, 6, 8310, 10.3390/su6118310 Herrera, 2019, Reconciling global aspirations and local realities: challenges facing the sustainable development goals for water and sanitation, World Dev., 118, 106, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.009 Jagannathan, 2020, Great expectations? Reconciling the aspiration, outcome, and possibility of co-production, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 42, 22, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.010 Jantsch, 1970, Inter- and transdisciplinary university: a systems approach to education and innovation, High. Educ., 1, 403 Kapur, 2020 Klenk, 2017, Transdisciplinary sustainability research beyond engagement models: toward adventures in relevance, Environ. Sci. Pol., 78, 27, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.09.006 Lemos, 2018, To co-produce or not to co-produce, Nat. Sustain., 1, 722, 10.1038/s41893-018-0191-0 Linnér, 2019 Luseka, 2020, Initiating de-colonisation of WASH sector knowledge, Medium Mauser, 2013, Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 5, 420, 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001 Miller, 2020, Co-production in global sustainability: histories and theories, Environ. Sci. Pol., 113, 88, 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.016 Moallemi, 2020, Achieving the sustainable development goals requires transdisciplinary innovation at the local scale, One Earth, 3, 300, 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.006 Nilsson, 2016, Map the interactions between sustainable development goals, Nature, 1534, 320, 10.1038/534320a Norström, 2020, Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research, Nat. Sustain., 3, 10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 Oberlack, 2019, Theories of change in sustainability science: understanding how change happens, Gaia, 28, 106, 10.14512/gaia.28.2.8 Oliver, 2019, The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?, Heal. Res. Policy Syst., 17, 1 Pohl, 2010, Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal, Sci. Public Policy, 37, 267, 10.3152/030234210X496628 Pohl, 2021, Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process, Environ. Sci. Pol., 118, 18, 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005 Raworth, 2017, A doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century, Lancet Planet. Heal., 1, e48, 10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1 Riechers, 2019, Stories of favourite places in public spaces: emotional responses to landscape change, Sustain, 11 Riechers, 2021, Human-nature connectedness as leverage point, Ecosyst. People, 17, 215, 10.1080/26395916.2021.1912830 Riedy, 2021, Discursive entrepreneurship: ethical meaning-making as a transformative practice for sustainable futures, Sustain. Sci. Rockström, 2009, A safe operating space for humanity, Nature, 461, 472, 10.1038/461472a Schneider, 2019, Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: three generic mechanisms of impact generation, Environ. Sci. Pol., 102, 26, 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017 Schneider, 2021 Schuttenberg, 2015, Seeking our shared wisdom: a framework for understanding knowledge coproduction and coproductive capacities, Ecol. Soc., 20, 10.5751/ES-07038-200115 Scoones, 2020, Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 42, 65, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004 Sharpe, 2013 Sharpe, 2016, Three horizons: a pathways practice for transformation, Ecol. Soc., 21, 10.5751/ES-08388-210247 Steffen, 2015, Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet, Science (80-), 347, 10.1126/science.1259855 Tortajada, 2018, Achieving universal access to clean water and sanitation in an era of water scarcity: strengthening contributions from academia, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 34, 21, 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.08.001 Turnhout, 2020, The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 42, 15, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009 United Nations, 2010 United Nations, 2015 UN-Water, 2021 Veland, 2018, Narrative matters for sustainability: the transformative role of storytelling in realizing 1.5°C futures, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 31, 41, 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.12.005 Vincent, 2020, Addressing power imbalances in co-production, Nat. Clim. Chang., 10, 877, 10.1038/s41558-020-00910-w Waddock, 2020, Transformation: How to spur radical change West, 2019, Beyond “linking knowledge and action”: towards a practice-based approach to transdisciplinary sustainability interventions, Policy Stud., 40, 534, 10.1080/01442872.2019.1618810 West, 2020, A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations, Ecosyst. People, 16, 304, 10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417 Workman, 2021, Global water, sanitation, and hygiene approaches: anthropological contributions and future directions for engineering, Environ. Eng. Sci., 38, 402, 10.1089/ees.2020.0321 Worldviews Test Worsham, 2021, Leadership for SDG 6.2: is diversity missing?, Environ. Health Insights, 15, 10.1177/11786302211031846 Wyborn, 2019, Co-producing sustainability: reordering the governance of science, policy, and practice, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 44, 319, 10.1146/annurev-environ-101718-033103