So sánh giữa Pipeline và Tubridge trong điều trị dị dạng mạch máu tuần hoàn sau chưa vỡ

International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms, I. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms–risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(24):1725–33. Church EW, Bigder MG, Sussman ES, et al. Treatment of posterior circulation fusiform aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2020;134(6):1894–900. Pandey AS, Koebbe C, Rosenwasser RH, et al. Endovascular coil embolization of ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms: review of a 10-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2007;60(4):626–36. Griessenauer CJ, Enriquez-Marulanda A, Xiang S, et al. Comparison of PED and FRED flow diverters for posterior circulation aneurysms: a propensity score matched cohort study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(2):153–8. Hanel RA, Kallmes DF, Lopes DK, et al. Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(1):62–6. Becske T, Brinjikji W, Potts MB, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes following pipeline embolization device treatment of complex internal carotid artery aneurysms: five-year results of the pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms trial. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):40–8. Kallmes DF, Brinjikji W, Cekirge S, et al. Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies. J Neurosurg. 2017;127(4):775–80. Zhang Y, Huang QH, Fang Y, et al. A novel flow diverter (Tubridge) for the treatment of recurrent aneurysms: a single-center experience. Korean J Radiol. 2017;18(5):852–9. Griessenauer CJ, Thomas AJ, Enriquez-Marulanda A, et al. Comparison of pipeline embolization device and flow re-direction endoluminal device flow diverters for internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(2):E249–55. Cai H, Yang F, Xu Y, et al. A multicenter retrospective controlled study of the pipeline and Tubridge flow diverter devices for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1014596. Leung GK, Tsang AC, Lui WM. Pipeline embolization device for intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review. Clin Neuroradiol. 2012;22(4):295–303. Dmytriw AA, Dibas M, Adeeb N, et al. The pipeline embolization device: a decade of lessons learned in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg. 2022;137(5):1454–61. Liang F, Zhang Y, Yan P, et al. Outcomes and complications after the use of the pipeline embolization device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms of the posterior circulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:e888–95. Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E, et al. Off-label uses of the pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42(6):E4. Zhou Y, Yang PF, Fang YB, et al. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using a Tubridge flow diverter (PARAT): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:97. Liu JM, Zhou Y, Li Y, et al. Parent artery reconstruction for large or giant cerebral aneurysms using the Tubridge flow diverter: a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial (PARAT). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):807–16. Zhou Y, Yang PF, Fang YB, et al. A novel flow-diverting device (Tubridge) for the treatment of 28 large or giant intracranial aneurysms: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(12):2326–33. Li L, Shao QJ, Li TX, et al. Effect and safety of Tubridge flow diverter in the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(50):e31672. Sweid A, Starke RM, Herial N, et al. Predictors of complications, functional outcome, and morbidity in a large cohort treated with flow diversion. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(4):730–43. Wang CB, Shi WW, Zhang GX, et al. Flow diverter treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms. A meta-analysis. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(4):391–400. Bender MT, Colby GP, Jiang B, et al. Flow diversion of posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms: a single-institution series of 59 cases. Neurosurgery. 2019;84(1):206–16. Alwakeal A, Shlobin NA, Golnari P, et al. Flow diversion of posterior circulation aneurysms: systematic review of disaggregated individual patient data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(10):1827–33. Abdel-Tawab M, Abdeltawab AK, Abdelmonem M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flow diverters in posterior circulation aneurysms and comparison with their efficacy in anterior circulation aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Interv Neuroradiol. 2021;27(5):609–21. Liang XD, Wang ZL, Li TX, et al. Safety and efficacy of a new prophylactic tirofiban protocol without oral intraoperative antiplatelet therapy for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(11):1148–53. Wang C, Zhu D, Xu X, et al. Use of flow diverter device in basilar artery for aneurysm treatment: case series and literature review. Front Neurol. 2022;13:990308. Griessenauer CJ, Ogilvy CS, Adeeb N, et al. Pipeline embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms: a multicenter study of 131 aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(3):923–35. Lin N, Brouillard AM, Krishna C, et al. Use of coils in conjunction with the pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(2):142–9. Foreman PM, Salem MM, Griessenauer CJ, et al. Flow diversion for treatment of partially thrombosed aneurysms: a multicenter cohort. World Neurosurg. 2020;135:e164–73.