Piloting accounts for recreational ecosystem services: Quality, use, and monetary value of freshwaters in Finland

Daily, 2009, Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 7, 21, 10.1890/080025 De Groot, 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecol. Complex., 7, 260, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 Barton, 2019, Discussion paper 10: recreation services from ecosystems Hein, 2016, Defining ecosystem assets for natural capital accounting, PLoSONE11, 11 United Nations et al. 2021. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). White cover publication, pre-edited text subject to official editing. Available at: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting. Obst, 2016, National accounting and the valuation of ecosystem assets and their services, Environ. Resour. Econ., 64, 1, 10.1007/s10640-015-9921-1 Droste, 2018, Ecosystem service valuation for national accounting: a reply to obst, hein and edens (2016), Environ. Resour. Econ., 71, 205, 10.1007/s10640-017-0146-3 Ahtiainen, 2014, Benefits of meeting nutrient reduction targets for the Baltic Sea – a contingent valuation study in the nine coastal states, J. Environ. Econ. Pol., 3, 278, 10.1080/21606544.2014.901923 Latinopoulos, 2016, Valuing the benefits of an urban park project: a contingent valuation study in Thessaloniki, Greece, Land Use Pol., 55, 130, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.020 Bertram, 2017, Going to the woods is going home: recreational benefits of a larger urban forest site – a travel cost analysis for Berlin, Germany, Ecol. Econ., 132, 255, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.017 Hanauer, 2017, Valuing urban open space using the travel-cost method and the implications of measurement error, J. Environ. Manag., 198, 50, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.005 Haab, 2002 Caparrós, 2017, Simulated exchange values and ecosystem accounting: theory and application to free access recreation, Ecol. Econ., 139, 140, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.011 Zandersen, 2009, A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe. A meta-analysis of forest recreation values in Europe, J. For. Econ., 15, 109 Londoño, 2012, Enhancing the reliability of benefit transfer over heterogeneous sites: a meta-analysis of international coral reef values, Ecol. Econ., 78, 80, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.016 Boyle, 2013, Due diligence in meta-analyses to support benefit transfers, Environ. Resour. Econ., 55, 357, 10.1007/s10640-012-9630-y Neher, 2013, Valuation of National Park System visitation: the efficient use of count data models, meta-analysis, and secondary visitor survey data, J. Environ. Manag., 52, 683 Ghermandi, 2015, Benefits of coastal recreation in Europe: identifying trade-offs and priority regions for sustainable management, J. Environ. Manag., 152, 218, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.047 Ahtiainen, 2015, Modelling asymmetric preferences for water quality in choice experiments with individual-specific status quo alternatives, Water Resour.Econ., 12, 1, 10.1016/j.wre.2015.10.003 Lankia, 2019, Effects of water quality changes on the recreation benefits of swimming in Finland: combined travel cost and contingent behavior model, Water Resour.Econ., 25, 2, 10.1016/j.wre.2017.10.002 Bertram, 2020, Contingent behavior and asymmetric preferences for baltic sea coastal recreation, Environ. Resour. Econ., 75, 49, 10.1007/s10640-019-00388-x Vallecillo, 2019, How ecosystem services are changing: an accounting application at the EU level, Ecosyst. Serv., 40, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.101044 Horlings, 2019, Experimental monetary valuation of ecosystem services and assets in The Netherlands Martin, 2018, Integrating cultural ecosystem services in an ecosystem satellite account: a case study in the gulf of saint-malo (France), Ecol. Econ., 143, 141, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.005 Warnell, K., Russell, M., Rhodes, C., Bagstads, K., Olander, L., Nowak, D., Poudel, R., Glynn, P., Hass, J., Hirabayashi, S. & Carter, J. Testing ecosystem accounting in the United States: A case study for the Southeast. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101099. Grilli, 2020, The role of natural capital accounting approaches for the management of saltmarshes: fast track versus simulated exchange value in the Deben Estuary Lankia, 2020, Outdoor recreation in ecosystem service accounting: pilot accounts from Finland, Scand. J. For. Res., 35, 186, 10.1080/02827581.2020.1760342 2019 Sievänen, 2011 Caparrós, 2003, An operative framework for total Hicksian income measurement: application to a multiple use forest, Environ. Resour. Econ., 26, 173, 10.1023/A:1026306832349 Parsons, 2003, The travel cost model Vesterinen, 2010, Impacts of changes in water quality on recreation behavior and benefits in Finland, J. Environ. Manag., 91, 984, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.12.005 Paloniemi, 2018, Environmental justice for the governance of aquatic environments, Local Environ., 23, 366, 10.1080/13549839.2017.1422118 Neuvonen, 2009, 116 Schirpke, 2018, Revealing spatial and temporal patterns of outdoor recreation in the European Alps and their surroundings, Ecosyst. Serv., 31, 336, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.017 Heikinheimo, 2017, Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6, 85, 10.3390/ijgi6030085 Hotelling, 1929, Stability in competition, Econ. J., 39, 41, 10.2307/2224214