Phytoplasmas: bacteria that manipulate plants and insects

Molecular Plant Pathology - Tập 9 Số 4 - Trang 403-423 - 2008
Saskia A. Hogenhout1,2, Kenro Oshima3, El‐Desouky Ammar2, Shigeyuki Kakizawa3, Heather N. Kingdom1, Susumu Namba3
1Department of Disease and Stress Biology, The John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Colney Lane, Colney, Norwich, Norfolk NR4 7UH, UK
2Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University-OARDC, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
3Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Biology, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan

Tóm tắt

SUMMARYTaxonomy:   Superkingdom Prokaryota; Kingdom Monera; Domain Bacteria; Phylum Firmicutes (low‐G+C, Gram‐positive eubacteria); Class Mollicutes; Candidatus (Ca.) genus Phytoplasma.Host range:   Ca. Phytoplasma comprises approximately 30 distinct clades based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses of ~200 phytoplasmas. Phytoplasmas are mostly dependent on insect transmission for their spread and survival. The phytoplasma life cycle involves replication in insects and plants. They infect the insect but are phloem‐limited in plants. Members of Ca. Phytoplasma asteris (16SrI group phytoplasmas) are found in 80 monocot and dicot plant species in most parts of the world. Experimentally, they can be transmitted by approximately 30, frequently polyphagous insect species, to 200 diverse plant species.Disease symptoms:   In plants, phytoplasmas induce symptoms that suggest interference with plant development. Typical symptoms include: witches’ broom (clustering of branches) of developing tissues; phyllody (retrograde metamorphosis of the floral organs to the condition of leaves); virescence (green coloration of non‐green flower parts); bolting (growth of elongated stalks); formation of bunchy fibrous secondary roots; reddening of leaves and stems; generalized yellowing, decline and stunting of plants; and phloem necrosis. Phytoplasmas can be pathogenic to some insect hosts, but generally do not negatively affect the fitness of their major insect vector(s). In fact, phytoplasmas can increase fecundity and survival of insect vectors, and may influence flight behaviour and plant host preference of their insect hosts.Disease control:   The most common practices are the spraying of various insecticides to control insect vectors, and removal of symptomatic plants. Phytoplasma‐resistant cultivars are not available for the vast majority of affected crops.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1038/nrm1984

10.1093/genetics/164.4.1279

10.1101/SQB.1995.060.01.074

10.1073/pnas.88.15.6545

10.1201/9781420005936.ch6

10.1007/s00203-003-0630-8

10.1534/genetics.166.1.25

10.1089/dna.2007.0654

10.1099/ijs.0.63797-0

10.1016/j.gene.2004.03.022

10.1128/JB.188.10.3682-3696.2006

10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09596.x

10.1099/00221287-148-1-157

10.1093/nar/gkh114

10.1128/JB.151.3.1514-1522.1982

10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0271:IOAYPO]2.0.CO;2

10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028

10.1099/13500872-145-8-1937

10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00655-2

10.1099/mic.0.28541-0

10.1099/mic.0.29085-0

10.2741/2092

10.1073/pnas.97.10.5322

10.1099/00221287-147-3-571

Botti S., 2006, Phytoplasma infection through seed transmission: further observations, Abstracts, 16th International Organization of Mycoplasmology Conference, Cambridge, UK, 76

10.1128/AEM.70.7.3960-3967.2004

10.1094/Phyto-72-159

10.1016/j.tplants.2005.09.008

10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.11.1175

10.1080/09687860500063316

10.1007/978-1-4615-2924-8_11

10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00152.x

10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.735

10.1016/S0962-8924(02)00006-5

10.1146/annurev.cellbio.16.1.51

10.1099/00207713-47-2-262

10.1016/j.plasmid.2004.09.002

10.3186/jjphytopath.33.259

10.1128/AEM.69.10.6225-6234.2003

10.1093/ee/23.3.634

10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01555-3

10.1007/BF02357889

10.2741/2153

10.1126/science.270.5235.397

10.2741/gaspari

10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00230-4

10.1038/35037619

10.1038/377246a0

10.1099/00207713-49-4-1605

10.1128/MMBR.67.2.277-301.2003

10.1128/jb.176.17.5244-5254.1994

10.1099/00207713-46-1-64

Hadidi A., 2004, DNA microarrays and their potential applications for the detection of plant viruses, viroids, and phytoplasmas, J. Plant Pathol, 86, 97

10.1016/S0962-8924(01)02183-3

10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01193-7

10.1099/ijs.0.02842-0

10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01561.x

10.1038/335167a0

Iida T., 1972, Discovery of a plant pathogenic mycoplasma, Plant Prot, 26, 175

10.1105/tpc.11.3.309

10.1099/ijs.0.02854-0

10.3186/jjphytopath.33.267

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004195

10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00057.x

10.1099/00207713-48-1-269

10.1089/dna.2007.0610

10.1038/nature05286

10.1186/1471-2164-6-175

10.1099/ijs.0.01980-0

10.1099/ijs.0.02393-0

10.1099/ijs.0.02531-0

10.1016/j.tim.2006.04.008

10.1128/JB.188.9.3424-3428.2006

10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.9.1043

10.1099/mic.0.26521-0

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03029.x

10.1126/science.1096931

10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.10.1038

10.1099/mic.0.28602-0

10.1094/PHYTO-95-0541

10.1073/pnas.0730515100

10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315

10.2307/2435474

10.1099/00207713-42-2-226

10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1144

Lee I.M., 1992, Mycoplasmas: Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis, 379

10.1099/ijs.0.64251-0

10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.221

10.1099/00207713-48-4-1153

10.1099/ijs.0.02843-0

10.1099/ijs.0.02697-0

10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.036

10.1016/j.mcp.2005.10.001

10.1006/jipa.1994.1053

10.1177/38.1.2294149

10.1128/jb.171.11.5901-5906.1989

10.1128/jb.173.6.2128-2130.1991

10.1128/jb.174.8.2606-2611.1992

10.1094/Phyto-73-1608

10.1111/j.1744-7348.1984.tb03069.x

10.1128/MMBR.62.3.725-774.1998

10.1007/BF02137357

10.1099/ijs.0.02838-0

10.1099/00207713-50-5-1703

10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.9.805

10.1099/ijs.0.02837-0

10.1016/B978-0-12-470280-6.50015-5

10.1016/B978-0-12-078403-5.50014-1

10.1016/B978-0-12-078405-9.50019-7

10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.3.238

10.1007/BF01876094

10.1099/00207713-51-3-1109

10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00665-7

10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00155.x

10.1093/aesa/91.5.668

10.1093/jee/89.5.1223

10.1002/prot.340110203

10.3186/jjphytopath.61.519

10.1094/Phyto-83-786

10.1099/00207713-43-3-461

Nault L.R., 1985, The Leafhoppers and Planthoppers, 309

Nault L.R., 1990, Evolution of an insect pest: Maize and the corn leafhopper, a case study, Maydica, 35, 165

10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993.tb01093.x

10.1073/pnas.0308399100

10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01558.x

10.1093/protein/10.1.1

10.1093/genetics/148.3.929

10.1016/B978-0-12-470280-6.50005-2

10.1099/00221287-147-2-507

10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00975-7

10.1099/00221287-148-5-1389

10.1111/j.1365-3059.2007.01623.x

Okuda S., 1972, Occurrence of diseases caused by mycoplasma‐like organisms in Japan, Plant Prot, 26, 180

10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00408.x

10.1038/ng1277

10.1006/viro.2001.0938

10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.11.1024

10.1016/S0022-2011(03)00031-4

10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03119.x

Peterson A.G., 1973, Host plant and aster leafhopper relationships, Proc. North Cent. Branch Entomol. Soc. Am, 28, 66

10.1111/j.1744-7348.1981.tb04797.x

10.1111/j.1570-7458.1988.tb01110.x

10.1128/MMBR.62.4.1094-1156.1998

10.1146/annurev.ento.49.061802.123403

10.1093/nar/30.9.2031

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026212

10.1126/science.1097404

Saitou N., 1987, The neighbor‐joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees, Mol. Biol. Evol, 4, 406

10.1038/35020586

10.1128/jb.176.22.6802-6811.1994

10.1099/00207713-49-3-1275

10.1099/ijs.0.63285-0

Schultz G.A., 1973, Plant resistance to aster yellows, Proc. North Cent. Branch Entomol. Soc. Am, 28, 93

10.1093/emboj/19.4.542

10.1080/07060668909501077

10.1099/ijs.0.02823-0

Seemüller E., 1998, Current status of molecular classification of the phytoplasmas, J. Plant Pathol, 80, 3

10.1099/00207713-44-3-440

10.1038/sj.emboj.7600063

10.1094/Phyto-83-671

10.1111/j.1439-0434.1987.tb00477.x

10.1073/pnas.0508668103

10.1126/science.1071278

Tanaka J., 2005, [Type IV secretion system in Helicobacter pylori: comparison with bacterial type III secretion apparatus], Tanpakushitsu Kakusan Koso, 50, 36

10.6026/97320630001176

10.1093/nar/25.24.4876

10.1128/MMBR.64.3.515-547.2000

10.1016/j.mcp.2005.06.002

10.1099/00207713-44-1-119

10.1093/embo-reports/kve108

10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003991

10.1099/ijs.0.63935-0

10.1099/ijs.0.02453-0

10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.7.683

10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151039

10.1128/jb.171.12.6455-6467.1989

10.1099/00207713-37-2-136

10.1038/nrg931

10.1016/B978-0-12-078405-9.50018-5

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01918.x

10.1073/pnas.77.1.494

10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00840-2

10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.8.842

10.1099/00207713-45-3-449