Physician Perceptions Regarding Antimicrobial Use in End-of-Life Care

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology - Tập 39 Số 4 - Trang 383-390 - 2018
Christopher E. Gaw1, Keith Hamilton2, Jeffrey S. Gerber3,4,5, Julia E. Szymczak4
1Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
3Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
4Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Tóm tắt

BACKGROUNDThe decision to utilize antimicrobials in end-of-life situations is complex. Understanding the reasons why physicians prescribe antimicrobials in this patient population is important for informing the design of antimicrobial stewardship interventions.METHODSA 51-item survey containing both closed and open-ended questions on end-of-life antimicrobial use was administered to physicians affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia from January through April 2017. A mixed-methods approach was used to analyze responses.RESULTSOf 637 physicians surveyed, 283 responses (44.4%) were received. Most (86.2%) physicians believed that respecting a patient’s wish to continue antimicrobials was important. Approximately half of physicians (49.8%) believed that antimicrobial use at the end of life contributes to resistance. A higher proportion of pediatricians would often or always continue antimicrobial treatment for active infections and for hospice patients whose death was imminent compared to adult physicians (P<.001). Analysis of free-text responses revealed additional reasons why physicians may continue antimicrobials at end of life, including meeting family expectations, wanting to avoid the perception of “giving up,” uncertainty about prognosis, and reducing patient pain or discomfort.CONCLUSIONSPhysician decision making concerning antimicrobial use in patients at the end of life is multifactorial. Clinicians may overweigh the benefits of antimicrobial therapy in end-of-life situations and view the importance of adhering to stewardship policies differently. Pediatric and adult clinicians have different approaches to this patient population. Better understanding of the complex decision making that occurs in the end-of-life patient population can help guide antimicrobial stewardship policies and improve patient care.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:383–390

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/1049909111432625

10.1177/1049909109352336

Yeo, 2016, Antimicrobial stewardship: improving antibiotic prescribing practice in a respiratory ward, BMJ Qual Improv Rept, 5, u206491

10.1086/323757

10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01527.x

10.1089/jpm.2008.0235

Davey, 2017, Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2, CD003543

10.1128/AAC.02873-14

10.1089/jpm.2013.0276

10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.013

10.1093/cid/ciw353

10.1056/NEJMp1109283

10.1542/peds.112.3.691

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.006

Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/threat-report-2013/index.html. Published 2013. Accessed January 10, 2018.

Huberman, 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2005.00450.x

10.1542/peds.2014-2579

10.1017/ice.2014.41

10.1001/archinternmed.2007.104

10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.237

10.1016/S0885-3924(00)00189-5

10.1016/j.idc.2014.01.003

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.010

10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10711.x

10.1093/jac/dkr425

10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010

10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.11.007

10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.02.012

10.1017/S1478951512000673

10.1093/cid/cit212

10.1186/s13756-015-0065-4

10.1001/jama.2013.283830

10.1177/0269216309103664

10.1177/1049909115577050

10.1186/1471-2288-8-50

10.1007/s40121-015-0080-z

10.1371/journal.pone.0151435

10.1016/j.idc.2014.01.004