Physicalism and the Identity of Identity Theories

Annalen der Philosophie - Tập 87 Số 1 - Trang 161-180 - 2022
Samuel Z. Elgin1
1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Albert, D. (2003). Time and chance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Block, N. (1980). Troubles with functionalism. In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in the philosophy of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Boyd, R. (1980). Materialism without reductionism: What physicalism does not entail. In N. Block (Ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–67). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cameron, R. (2008). Truthmakers and ontological commitment: Or how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting intro trouble. Philosophical Studies, 140, 1–18.

Cameron, R. (2010). How to have a radically minimal ontology. Philosophical Studies, 151, 249–64.

Carnap, R. (1947). Meaning and necessity: A study in semantics and modal logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chalmers, D., & Jackson, F. (2001). Conceptual analysis and reductive explanation. The Philosophical Review, 110(3), 315–61.

Correia, F., & Skiles, A. (2017). Grounding, essence and identity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Correia, F. (2017). Real definitions. Philosophical Issues, 27(1), 52–73.

Crane, T., & Mellor, D. H. (1990). There is no question of physicalism. Mind, 99(394), 185–206.

Davidson, D. (1970). Mental events. In L. Foster & J. W. Swanson (Eds.), Essays on actions and events (pp. 207–24). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Della Rocca, M. (2014). Razing structures to the ground. Analytic Philosophy, 55(3), 276–94.

Dorr, C. (2016). To Be F Is To Be G. Philosophical Perspectives, 30(1), 39–134.

Elgin, S. (forthcoming). The semantic foundations of philosophical analysis.

Fine, K. (2002). Varieties of necessity. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Conceivability and possibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fine K (2016a). Angellic content. Journal of Philosophical Logic45(2), 199–226.

Fine, K. (2016b). Identity criteria and ground. Philosophical Studies, 173, 1–19.

Fine, K. (2017). Truthmaker semantics. In B. Hale, C. Wright, & A. Miller (Eds.), Companion to the philosophy of language (pp. 556–77). Oxford: Blackwell.

Fodor, J. (1974). Special sciences: Or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis. Synthese, 28(2), 97–115.

Gillett, C. (2003). The metaphysics of realization, multiple realization and the special sciences. The Journal of Philosophy, 100, 591–603.

Heil, J. (1999). Multiple realizability. American Philosophical Quarterly, 36(3), 189–208.

Heil, J. (2000). Truthmaking and entailment. Logique & Analyse, 169–70, 231–42.

Heil, J. (2003). From an ontological point of view. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heil, J. (2011). Powers and the realization relation. The Monist, 94(1), 34–53.

Heil, J. (2012). The universe as we find it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heil, J., & Robb, D. (2003). Mental properties. American Philosophical Quarterly, 40(3), 175–96.

Horgan, T. (1984). Functionalism and token physicalism. Synthese, 59(3), 321–38.

Kim, J. (1993). Mind and supervenience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kocurek, A. (2018). Counteridenticals. The Philosophical Review, 127(3), 323–69.

Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(4), 343–77.

Lewis, D. (1986). On the plurality of worlds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mill, J. S. (1947). A system of logic. Longmans: Green and Co.

Moore, G. E. (1952). The philosophy of G.E. Moore (pp. 660–667). New York: Tudor Pub Co.

Morris, K. (Forthcoming). Multiple realization and compositional variation. Synthese.

Morris, K. (2011). Theoretical identities as explanatia and explananda. American Philosophical Quarterly, 48(4), 373–85.

Morris, K. (2014). Supervenience physicalism, emergentism, and the polluted supervenience base. Erkenntnis, 79, 351–65.

Morris, K. (2018). Physicalism, truthmaking and levels of reality: Prospects and problems. Topoi, 37, 473–82.

Pereboom, D. (2002). Robust nonreductive materialism. The Journal of Philosophy, 99(19), 499–531.

Polger, T. (2004). Natural minds. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Rayo, A. (2013). The construction of logical space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosen, G. (2010). Metaphysical dependence: Grounding and reduction. In A. Hale & B. Hoffman (Eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, logic and epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rosen, G. (2015). Real definition. Analytic Philosophy, 56(3), 189–209.

Schaffer, J. (2017). The ground between the gaps. Philosopher’s Imprint, 17(11), 1–26.

Schroer, R. (2010). How far can the physical sciences reach? American Philosophical Quarterly, 47(3), 253–66.

Schulte, P. (2014). Can truthmaker theorists claim ontological free lunches? European Journal of Philosophy, 22, 249–68.

Shoemaker, S. (1994). Physical realization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Smart, J. J. C. (1959). Sensations and brain processes. The Philosophical Review, 68(2), 141–56.

Stoljar, D. (2017). Physicalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (pp. 1–67).

Stoljar, D. (2010). Physicalism. Abingdon: Routledge.

Wilson, J. (1999). How superduper does a physicalist supervenience need to be? The Philosophical Quarterly, 49(194), 33–52.

Wilson, J. (2014). No work for a theory of grounding. Inquiry, 57(5–6), 535–79.