Phylogenetic relationships and sectional delineation within Gentiana (Gentianaceae)

Taxon - Tập 69 Số 6 - Trang 1221-1238 - 2020
Adrien Favre1,2, James S. Pringle3, Jacqueline Heckenhauer1,2, Ekaterina Kozuharova4, Qingbo Gao5, Emily Moriarty Lemmon6,7, Alan R. Lemmon6,7, Hang Sun8, Natalia Tkach9, Sebastian Gebauer9, Shan‐Shan Sun10, Peng‐Cheng Fu10
1LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
2Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
3Royal Botanical Gardens, P.O. Box 399, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3H8
4Medical University of Sofia, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria
5Chinese Academy of Sciences, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Xining, 810001 People's Republic of China
6Florida State University, 89 Chieftan Way, Department of Biological Science, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4295 U.S.A.
7Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Department of Scientific Computing, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4102 U.S.A.
8Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650204, Yunnan, Peoples Republic of China
9Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Botany, Department of Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Neuwerk 21, 06108 Halle (Saale), Germany
10Luoyang Normal University, College of Life Science, 6 Jiqing Road, Luolong District, Luoyang, 471934 People's Republic of China

Tóm tắt

AbstractGentiana is a sub‐cosmopolitan temperate genus among the most species‐rich in Gentianaceae. Although molecular data (produced via Sanger sequencing) allowed the resolution of phylogenetic relationships between Gentiana and other genera in subtribe Gentianinae, the validity of sections within the genus remains largely untested. In this study, we evaluated the monophyly of all 14 sections attributed to Gentiana, using 294 unlinked anchored loci, the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) cistron as well as plastid genomes, all produced by anchored hybrid enrichment. We reconstructed phylogenetic relationships by conducting maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses. These analyses represent a significant improvement over previous taxonomic studies using molecular tools. Our results partly correspond to traditional taxonomic treatments, with several sections being well supported as monophyletic, including Gentiana sect. Calathianae, sect. Ciminalis, sect. Cruciata, sect. Frigida, sect. Gentiana and sect. Pneumonanthe. In contrast, G. sect. Isomeria, sect. Microsperma and sect. Monopodiae were found to be polyphyletic, whereas sect. Dolichocarpa and sect. Fimbricorona were nested within sect. Chondrophyllae. We here provide new taxonomic treatments for these sections, mostly based upon the traditional delineation of their series, which were recovered as monophyletic. In our new treatment, Gentiana encompasses 13 sections. A new determination key to the sections of Gentiana is provided.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2

Anilkumar K.A., 2015, Gentiana kurumbae, a new species of Gentianaceae from the Western Ghats of Kerala, India, Taiwania, 60, 81

Buddenhagen C.E. Lemmon A.R. Lemmon E.M. Bruhl J. Cappa J. Clement W.L. Donoghue M.J. Edwards E.J. Hipp A.L. Kortyna M. Mitchell N. Moore A. Prychid C.J. Segovia‐Salcedo M.C. Simmons M.P. Soltis P.S. Wanke S.&Mast A.2016.Anchored phylogenomics of angiosperms I: Assessing the robustness of phylogenetic estimates.bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/086298

Edler D. Klein J. Antonelli A.&Silvestro D.2019.raxmlGUI 2.0 beta: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML.bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/800912

10.1002/tax.596005

10.12705/632.5

10.1111/jbi.12840

10.1086/284325

Grisebach A.H.R., 1845, Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, 38

Halda J.J., 1995, Synopsis of the new system of the Gentiana, Acta Mus. Richnov., Sect. Nat., 3, 25

10.1186/s12862-016-0769-y

Ho T.N., 1990, The infrageneric classification of Gentiana (Gentianaceae), Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Bot., 20, 169

Ho T.N., 2001, A worldwide monograph of Gentiana

10.3417/2003046

Ho T.N., 1995, Flora of China, 1

Ho T.N., 2002, Metagentiana, a new genus of Gentianaceae, Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin., 43, 83

Hsieh T.Y., 2007, Gentiana bambuseti (Gentianaceae), a new species from Taiwan, Bot. Stud. (Teipei), 48, 349

10.1017/S096042860700090X

10.1093/molbev/mst010

10.1093/nar/gkf436

10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

Kusnezow N.I., 1894, Subgenus Eugentiana of genus Gentiana Tourn, Trudy S.‐Peterburgsk. Obshch. Estestvoisp., Otd. Bot., 24, 1

Kusnezow N., 1895, Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 80

Laínz M., 1976, Aportaciones al concimiento de la flora Cántabro‐Astur, XI, Bol. Inst. Estud. Asturianos, 22, 3

10.1093/sysbio/syp017

10.1093/sysbio/sys049

Löve Á., 1975, The Spanish gentians, Anales Inst. Bot. Cavanilles, 32, 221

Löve Á., 1978, Holubogentia, a new name in Gentianaceae, Bot. Not., 131, 385

10.1002/j.1996-8175.1986.tb00852.x

10.1017/S096042861400016X

Marquand C.V.B., 1937, The gentianas of China, Bull. Misc. Inform. Kew, 1937, 134

10.3732/ajb.1500352

10.1111/jbi.12617

10.1270/jsbbs.59.119

10.3732/ajb.1600227

10.1016/j.gene.2015.12.005

10.1080/00173136709432847

10.1007/s00606-015-1250-x

Pringle J.S., 1978, Sectional and subgeneric names in Gentiana (Gentianaceae), Sida, 7, 232

Pringle J.S, 2013, (“2012”). Gentiana sirensis (Gentianaceae), a new species from the Cordillera El Sira, Peru, Arnaldoa, 19, 149

10.1007/978-3-642-54010-3_1

10.3417/2015009

10.3372/wi.38.38204

10.1038/nature15697

Rambaut A.2010.FigTree version 1.4.0.http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/

10.1186/1471-2164-13-312

10.1093/sysbio/sys029

10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

Stevens P.F.2001–. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 14 July 2017 [regularly updated since].http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/

Struwe L., 2002, Systematics, character evolution, and biogeography of Gentianaceae, including a new tribal and subtribal classification

10.3389/fpls.2018.00493

10.1080/23802359.2019.1677196

10.1007/978-3-662-47901-8_7

10.5735/085.049.0307

10.1007/BF00982961

10.1111/j.1095-8339.1997.tb01403.x

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12750.x