Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumesThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Systematics Research.
Tóm tắt
Subfamily Caesalpinioideae is a paraphyletic grade of 171 genera that comprises the first branches of the Leguminosae and from which are derived the monophyletic subfamilies Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae. We have sequenced the chloroplast matK gene, and the trnL and 3′-trnK introns for 153 genera of caesalpinioid legumes. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses of these data support the monophyly of several major groups within the caesalpinioid legumes: the Cercideae, Detarieae, Detarieae s. str., Prioria , Amherstieae, Dialiinae, Cassia , Caesalpinia , Peltophorum , and Tachigali clades. Relationships among the first branching lineages of the legumes are not well supported, with Cercideae, Detarieae, and the genus Duparquetia alternatively resolved as sister group to all of the legumes. The division of certain large genera (e.g., Caesalpinia s. l., Bauhinia s. l.) into segregate genera generally is supported by our molecular data. Using 18 well-documented fossils as calibration points, fixing the stem node of the legumes at 65 Ma, and using the Penalised Likelihood method, we estimate the crown node of the Leguminosae at 64 Ma and the crown age of each of the major caesalpinioid lineages varying from 34 to 56 Ma. Fossil cross-validation suggests that none of the 18 fossil calibrations is internally inconsistent. Analyses done without fossil calibrations yield much younger divergence times. The age estimates for the Detarieae clade are more sensitive to the presence of calibration points than other caesalpinioid clades, a situation which we attribute to the slow rate of chloroplast DNA evolution in this group.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adegoke O.S., 1978, Rev. Esp. Micropaleontol, 10, 267
Banks, H., Klitgaard, B.B., Lewis, G.P., Crane, P.R., and Bruneau, A. 2003. Pollen and the systematics of tribes Caesalpinieae and Cassieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 95–122.
Bello M.A., 2008, Syst. Bot.
Breteler, F.J. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny.Edited byM.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 53–61.
Breteler F.J., 1999, Agric. Univ. Wagening. Pap., 99, 1
Bruneau, A., and Breteler, F.J., Wieringa, J.J. Gervais, G.Y.F., and Forest, F. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae as inferred from chloroplasttrnL intron sequences.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 121–149.
Bruneau A., 2001, Syst. Bot., 26, 487
Chappill, J.A. 1995. Cladistic analysis of the Leguminosae: the development of an explicit hypothesis.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny.Edited byM.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1–9.
Cowan, R.S., and Polhill, R.M. 1981a. Detarieae DC. (1825).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 117–134.
Cowan, R.S., and Polhill, R.M. 1957b. Amherstieae Benth. emend. J. Léon. (1957).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 135–142.
Crawley M., 1988, Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol., 44, 3
Crepet, W.L., and Herendeen, P.S. 1992. Papilionoid flowers from the early Eocene of southeastern North America.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 43–55.
De Franceschi D., 2003, Geodiversitas, 25, 633
Doyle J.J., 1987, Phytochem. Bull., 19, 11
Doyle, J.J., Chappill, J.A., Bailey, C.D., and Kajita, T. 2000. Towards a comprehensive phylogeny of legumes: evidence fromrbcLsequences and non-molecular data.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1–20.
Forest, F., Bruneau, A., Hawkins, J.A., Kajita, T., Doyle, J.J., and Crane, P.R. 2002. The sister of the Leguminosae revealed: phylogenetic relationships in the Fabales determined using trnL and rbcL sequences. In Proceedings of Botany 2002 - Botany in the Curriculum:
Integrating Research and Teaching [online]. 2-4 August 2002. Madison, Wisc. Available from bsa2002.scientific-conference.net/section12/abstracts/101.shtml [accessed 11 February 2008].
Fortunato, R.H. 2005. Mimozygantheae.InLegumes of the world.Edited byG. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 184–185.
Fougère-Danezan, M. 2005. Phylogénie moléculaire et morphologique des Detarieae résinifères (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). Contribution à l’étude de l’histoire biogéographique des légumineuses. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal (Montréal, Que.) and Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III, Toulouse, France).
Fougère-Danezan, M., Maumont, S., and Bruneau, A. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 161–180.
Graham, A. 1992. The current status of the legume fossil record in the Caribbean region.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 161–167.
Guinet, Ph. 1981. Mimosoideae: the characters of their pollen grains.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 835–855.
Guinet Ph., 1976, Pollen Spores, 18, 483
Guinet Ph., 1987, Mém. Trav. E.P.H.E. Inst. Montpellier, 17, 159
Haston, E.M., Lewis, G.P., and Hawkins, J.A. 2003. A phylogenetic investigation of thePeltophorumgroup (Caesalpinieae: Leguminosae).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics.Edited byA. Bruneau and B.B. Klitgaard. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 149–159.
Herendeen, P.S. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae from the Eocene of southeastern North America.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 85–160.
Herendeen, P.S. 2000. Structural evolution in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 45–64.
Herendeen, P.S., and Crane, P.R. 1992. Early caesalpinioid fruits from the Palaeogene of southern England.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 57–68.
Herendeen, P.S., and Manchester, S.R. 2004. Fruits and foliage of Cercis from the Late Eocene of Oregon.InProceedings of Botany 2004 — Alpine Diversity: Adapted to the Peaks [online]. 31 July –5 August 2004. Snowbird resort, Salt Lake city, Utah. Available from www.botanyconference.org [accessed 11 February 2008].
Herendeen, P.S., and Wing, S. 2001. Papilionoid legume fruits and leaves from the Paleocene of northwestern Wyoming.InProceedings of Botany 2001 — Plants and People [online]. 12–16 August 2001. Albuquerque Convention Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Available from www.botany2001.org/section7/abstracts/26.shtml [accessed 11 February 2008].
Herendeen, P.S., Crepet, W.L., and Dilcher, D.L. 1992. The fossil history of the Leguminosae: phylogenetic and biogeographic implications.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 4. The fossil record.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and D.L. Dilcher. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 303–316.
Herendeen, P.S., Bruneau, A., and Lewis, G.P. 2003a. Phylogenetic relationships in the caesalpinioid legumes: a preliminary analysis based on morphological and molecular data.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level phylogenetics.Edited byB. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 37–62.
Hueber F.M., 1986, Geotimes, 31, 8
Ireland, H., Pennington, R.T., and Preston, J. 2000. Molecular systematics of the Swartzieae.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 217–231.
Irwin, H.S., and Barneby, R.C. 1981. Cassieae.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 97–106.
Jacobs B.F., 2004, Palaeogreogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 213, 115, 10.1016/S0031-0182(04)00368-2
Kosakovsky Pond S.L., 2005, Bioinformatics, 2, 676
Langenheim, J.H. 2003. Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Timber Press, Portland, Ore.
Léonard J., 1957, Mémoires de la Casse des sciences, Académie Royale des sciences, des lettres et des beaux-arts de Belgique, memoires 8, 30, 3
Lewis, G.P. 2005. Caesalpinieae.InLegumes of the world.Edited byG. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 127–161.
Lewis, G.P., and Forest, F. 2005. Cercideae.InLegumes of the world.Edited byG. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 57–67.
Lewis, G.P., and Schrire, B.D. 1995. A reappraisal of theCaesalpiniagroup (Caesalpinioideae: Caesalpinieae) using phylogenetic analysis.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 7. Phylogeny.Edited byM.D. Crisp and J.J. Doyle. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 41–52.
Lewis, G.P., Schrire, B., Mackinder, B., and Lock, M. 2005. Legumes of the world. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK.
Luckow, M., White, P.J., and Bruneau, A. 2000. Relationships among the basal genera of mimosoid legumes.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 165–180.
Luckow, M., Miller, J.T., Murphy, D.J., and Livshultz, T. 2003. A phylogenetic analysis of the Mimosoideae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast DNA sequence data.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 197–220.
MacGinitie, H.D. 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant Beds, Colorado. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publications. Publ.599: i-iii, 1–198.
Mackinder, B. 2005. Tribe Detarieae.InLegumes of the world.Edited byG. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 68–109.
Pennington, R.T., Klitgaard, B.B., Ireland, H., and Lavin, M. 2000. New insights into floral evolution of basal Papilionoideae from molecular phylogenies.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 9.Edited byP.S. Herendeen and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 233–248.
Pennington R.T., 2001, Syst. Bot., 26, 537
Poinar, G., and Poinar, R. 1999. The amber forest. A reconstruction of a vanished world. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
Polhill, R.M. 1981. Papilionoideae.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 191–208.
Polhill, R.M. 1994. Complete synopsis of legume genera.InPhytochemical dictionary of the Leguminosae. Vol. 1. Plants and their constituents.Edited byF.A. Bisby, J. Buckingham, and J.B. Harborne. Chapman and Hall, London, UK. pp. xlix–liv.
Polhill, R.M., and Vidal, J.E. 1981. Caesalpinieae.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 81–96.
Polhill, R.M., Raven, P.H., and Stirton, C.H. 1981. Evolution and systematics of the Leguminosae.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 1–26.
Rambaut, A., and Drummond, A.J. 2007. Tracer version 1.4 [online]. Available from tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [accessed 30 July 2007].
Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P., and van der Mark, P. 2005. Mr. Bayes 3.1 manual [online]. Available from mrbayes.csit.fsu.edu/mb3.1_manual.pdf [accessed 14 February 2008].
Salard-Cheboldaeff M., 1978, Pollen Spores, 20, 215
Sanderson, M.J. 2004. r8s: version 1.7. User’s manual [online]. Available from loco.biosci.arizona.edu/r8s/r8s1.7.manual.pdf [accessed 30 December 2004].
Schrire, B.D., Lavin, M., and Lewis, G.P. 2005a. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: insights from recent phylogenies.InPlant diversity and complexity patterns: local, regional and global dimensions.Edited byI. Friis and H. Balslev. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter,55: 375–422.
Schrire, B.D., Lewis, G.P., and Lavin, M. 2005b. Biogeography of the Leguminosae.InLegumes of the world.Edited byG. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 21–54.
Simpson, B.B., Larkin, L.L., and Weeks, A. 2003. Progress towards resolving the relationships of theCaesalpiniaGroup (Caesalpinieae: Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 123–148.
Sinou, C., Bruneau, A., Forest, F., and Lewis, G.P. 2007. Phylogenetic analysis of the genusBauhinia(Leguminosae: Caesalpiniodeae: Cercideae) [online].InProceedings of Botany and Plant Biology 2007 Joint Congress. 7–11 July 2007. Chicago, Ill. Available from www.2007.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=1135 [accessed 11 February 2008].
Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP* – Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
Wieringa J.J., 1999, Agric. Univ. Wagening. Pap., 99, 1
Wieringa, J.J., and Gervais, G.Y.F. 2003. Phylogenetic analyses of combined morphological and molecular data sets on theAphanocalyx-Bikinia-Tetraberlinioagroup (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae s.l.).InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. pp. 181–196.
Wojciechowski, M.F. 2003. Reconstructing the phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae): an early 21st century perspective.InAdvances in legume systematics. Part 10. Higher level systematics.Edited byB.B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 5–35.
Wunderlin, R., Larsen, K., and Larsen, S.S. 1981. Cercideae. Advances in legume systematics. Part 1.Edited byR.M. Polhill and P.H. Raven. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK. pp. 107–116.