Phase II Trial of ixabepilone in patients with cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors

Investigational New Drugs - Tập 25 - Trang 487-490 - 2007
Darren R. Feldman1, G. Varuni Kondagunta1, Michelle S. Ginsberg2, Nicole Ishill3, Sujata Patil3, John Cestaro1, Eugenie Obbens4, Joel Sheinfeld5, George J. Bosl1, Robert J. Motzer1
1Genitourinary service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
2Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
3Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Statistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
4Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
5Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

In a phase I study, ixabepilone, a novel non-taxane microtubule-stabilizing agent, demonstrated activity against both paclitaxel-sensitive and paclitaxel-refractory solid tumors. We conducted a phase II trial of this agent in patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT) who were resistant to conventional therapies. Patients with cisplatin-refractory GCT were enrolled in this single-institution, phase II trial. Ixabepilone was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours every 21 days. Dose modifications were planned according to a nomogram for adverse events. Responses were assessed every 6 weeks using tumor markers and radiographic imaging according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Patients who progressed (≥20% increase in tumor size or rising serum tumor markers) were taken off protocol. Twenty-nine cycles of treatment were administered to 12 patients. The most common Grade 3/4 toxicities were leukopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia. One patient (8%) achieved a confirmed objective partial response but this patient had not received prior treatment with a taxane. Based on slow accrual and a lack of antitumor activity in patients previously treated with a taxane, the trial was closed after enrolling 12 patients. For patients who had previously received taxane therapy, ixabepilone was not efficacious in the treatment of cisplatin-refractory GCT.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Kondagunta GV, Motzer RJ (2006) Chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 24:5493–5502 Beyer J, Kramar A, Mandanas R et al (1996) High-dose chemotherapy as salvage treatment in germ cell tumors: a multivariate analysis of prognostic variables. J Clin Oncol 14:2638–2645 Bollag DM, McQueney PA, Zhu J et al (1995) Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. Cancer Res 55:2325–2333 Lee FY, Borzilleri R, Fairchild CR et al (2001) BMS-247550: a novel epothilone analog with a mode of action similar to paclitaxel but possessing superior antitumor efficacy. Clin Cancer Res 7:1429–1437 Chou TC, Zhang XG, Harris CR et al (1998) Desoxyepothilone B is curative against human tumor xenografts that are refractory to paclitaxel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:15798–15802 Mani S, McDaid H, Hamilton A et al (2004) Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-247550, a novel derivative of epothilone B, in solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 10:1289–1298 Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Contr Clin Trials 10:1–10