Pharmacokinetics and Comparative Bioavailability of Apomorphine Sublingual Film and Subcutaneous Apomorphine Formulations in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease and “OFF” Episodes: Results of a Randomized, Three-Way Crossover, Open-Label Study

Felix Agbo1, Stuart H. Isaacson2, Ramon Gil3, Yu-Yuan Chiu1, Scott J. Brantley4, Parul Bhargava5,6, Bradford Navia6
1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling and Simulation, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Fort Lee, USA
2Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton, Boca Raton, USA
3Parkinson’s Disease Treatment Center of Southwest Florida, Port Charlotte, USA
4Nuventra, Inc, Durham, USA
5Merck & Co., Inc, North Wales, USA
6Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc., Marlborough, USA

Tóm tắt

In a pivotal study, apomorphine sublingual film (APL; KYNMOBI®) was an effective and generally well-tolerated on-demand treatment of “OFF” episodes in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD), approved across the dose range of 10–30 mg. Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of APL and two subcutaneous (SC) apomorphine formulations (SC-APO [APOKYN®] and SC-APO-GO [APO-go® PEN]) were evaluated in a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study (NCT03292016). Patients with PD and “OFF” episodes received an open-label randomized sequence of single doses of SC-APO and SC-APO-GO at the currently prescribed dose (2/3/4/5 mg) and APL doses with similar plasma exposure (15/20/25/30 mg) with ≥ 1-day washout between formulations. Plasma pharmacokinetics of apomorphine and apomorphine sulfate (major inactive metabolite) were measured 0–6 h postdose. Median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) of apomorphine was 0.63–0.75 h for APL and 0.25–0.38 h for SC-APO and SC-APO-GO. Geometric mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of apomorphine was 4.31–11.2 ng/ml across APL doses and was generally lower compared with SC apomorphine formulations within dose groups. Area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞) was similar across apomorphine formulations within most dose groups. Relative bioavailability of APL was ~ 17% of SC apomorphine by AUC∞; SC-APO and SC-APO-GO had similar bioavailability (98% and 83% by AUC∞ and Cmax, respectively). Apomorphine sulfate exposure was ~ three-fold higher for APL versus SC-APO and SC-APO-GO by AUC∞ and Cmax. In patients with PD and “OFF” episodes, APL demonstrated lower Cmax and relative bioavailability but similar exposures (AUCs) versus SC apomorphine within the approved dose range. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03292016.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Olanow CW, Stern MB, Sethi K. The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009). Neurology. 2009;72(21 Suppl 4):S1–136.

GBD Parkinson’s Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of Parkinson’s disease, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(11):939–53.

Marras C, Beck JC, Bower JH, Roberts E, Ritz B, Ross GW, et al. Prevalence of Parkinson’s disease across North America. NPJ Parkinson’s Dis. 2018;4:21.

Olanow CW, Stocchi F. Levodopa: a new look at an old friend. Mov Disord. 2018;33(6):859–66.

Ahlskog JE, Muenter MD. Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature. Mov Disord. 2001;16(3):448–58.

Chou KL, Stacy M, Simuni T, Miyasaki J, Oertel WH, Sethi K, et al. The spectrum of “off” in Parkinson’s disease: what have we learned over 40 years? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;51:9–16.

APO-go PFS 5 mg/ml Solution for Infusion in Pre-filled Syringe. Summary of Product Characteristics. Berkshire: Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; 2018.

APOKYN® (apomorphine hydrochloride injection) [Prescribing information]. Louisville: US WorldMeds, LLC; 2020.

APO-go Pen 10 mg/ml Solution for Injection. Summary of Product Characteristics. Berkshire: Britannia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.; 2018.

Gancher ST, Nutt JG, Woodward WR. Absorption of apomorphine by various routes in parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 1991;6(3):212–6.

Nomoto M, Kubo S, Nagai M, Yamada T, Tamaoka A, Tsuboi Y, et al. A randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous apomorphine for Parkinson disease: a repeat dose and pharmacokinetic study. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015;38(6):241–7.

Bilbault T, Taylor S, Walker R, Grundy SL, Pappert EJ, Agro A. Buccal mucosal irritation studies of sublingual apomorphine film (APL-130277) in Syrian golden hamsters. Ther Deliv. 2016;7(9):611–8.

Trenkwalder C, Chaudhuri KR, Garcia Ruiz PJ, LeWitt P, Katzenschlager R, Sixel-Doring F, et al. Expert Consensus Group report on the use of apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease–clinical practice recommendations. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(9):1023–30.

Bhidayasiri R, Chaudhuri KR, LeWitt P, Martin A, Boonpang K, van Laar T. Effective delivery of apomorphine in the management of Parkinson disease: practical considerations for clinicians and Parkinson nurses. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2015;38(3):89–103.

Bowron A. Practical considerations in the use of apomorphine injectable. Neurology. 2004;62(6 Suppl 4):S32–6.

Manson AJ, Turner K, Lees AJ. Apomorphine monotherapy in the treatment of refractory motor complications of Parkinson’s disease: long-term follow-up study of 64 patients. Mov Disord. 2002;17(6):1235–41.

Olanow CW, Factor SA, Espay AJ, Hauser RA, Shill HA, Isaacson S, et al. Apomorphine sublingual film for off episodes in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(2):135–44.

KYNMOBI® (apomorphine hydrochloride) sublingual film [Prescribing information]. Marlborough: Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2020.

Chen YL, Shi L, Agbo F, Yong SH, Tan PS, Ngounou Wetie AG. LC-MS/MS simultaneous quantification of apomorphine and its major metabolites in human plasma: application to clinical comparative bioavailability evaluation for the apomorphine sublingual film and a subcutaneous product. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2020;190:113493.

Hauser RA, Olanow CW, Dzyngel B, Bilbault T, Shill H, Isaacson S, et al. Sublingual apomorphine (APL-130277) for the acute conversion of OFF to ON in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2016;31(9):1366–72.

Argiolas A, Hedlund H. The pharmacology and clinical pharmacokinetics of apomorphine SL. BJU Int. 2001;88(Suppl 3):18–21.

Campbell A, Kula NS, Jeppsson B, Baldessarini RJ. Oral bioavailability of apomorphine in the rat with a portacaval venous anastomosis. Eur J Pharmacol. 1980;67(1):139–42.

Agbo F, Crass RL, Chiu Y-Y, Chapel S, Galluppi G, Blum D, et al. Population pharmacokinetic model of apomorphine sublingual film or subcutaneous apomorphine in healthy subjects and patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Transl Sci. 2021. Epub ahead of print 1 Mar 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13008.

Hui JS, Fox SH, Neeson W, Bhargava P, Pappert E, Blum D, et al. Open-label titration of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson’s disease and “OFF” episodes. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020;79:110–6.

Thach A, Sutphin J, Coulter J, Mansfield C. Patient experiences and preferences for specific on-demand treatments for Parkinson’s Disease-related “OFF” episodes. Houston: Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy; 2020. p. S40.

Agbo F, Chiu Y-Y, Chapel S, Navia B. Exposure-response efficacy model of apomorphine sublingual film for the treatment of “OFF” episodes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020;79(Suppl 1):E85–6.