Pervasiveness, severity, and remediation of internal control material weaknesses under SOX Section 404 and audit fees

Review of Accounting and Finance - Tập 8 Số 4 - Trang 369-387 - 2009
SantanuMitra1
1Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the association between pervasiveness, severity, and remediation of internal control material weakness (ICMW) reported by the SEC registrants pursuant to SOX Section 404 and audit fees.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs multivariate regression models for a sample of 854 firms that disclosed ICMW for the first time in 2004, 2005, or 2006, to investigate the empirical relationship of pervasiveness and severity of ICMW and its subsequent remediation with audit fees.FindingsThe analyses demonstrate that audit fees are significantly positively related to the severity (and pervasiveness) of ICMW in the years of ICMW disclosures and are significantly negatively related to the remediation of internal control weaknesses in the years when ICMW remediation took place. The test results further demonstrate that the remediation of systematic control weaknesses has a greater effect on reduction of audit fees compared to the remediation of nonsystematic (transaction/account related) control weaknesses, though the remediation of both systematic and nonsystematic control weaknesses is accompanied by audit fee declines.Research limitations/implicationsThe study produces evidence on pricing audit services by incumbent auditors in response to the severity of internal material control weaknesses and their remediation in subsequent fiscal periods. Its results shed light on certain new aspects of audit fee determinants in the post‐SOX period by virtue of their implications that the pervasiveness and severity of internal control problems induce auditors to make an upward fee adjustment while their remediation has a moderating effect on pricing audit services.Originality/valueThe study's finding is a useful addition to the existing fee literature and is relevant for the post‐SOX world which experienced a structural change in financial accounting and auditing environment.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbott, L.J., Parker, S., Peters, G.F. and Raghunandan, K. (2003), “The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 17‐32.

Altman, E. (1993), Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Ocean City, NJ.

Ashbaugh‐Skaife, H., Collins, D.W., Kinney, W.R. and LaFond, R. (2008), “The effect of SOX internal control deficiencies and their remediation on accrual quality”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 83 No. 1, pp. 217‐50.

Barron, O., Pratt, J. and Stice, J. (2001), “Misstatement direction, litigation risk, and planned audit investment”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 449‐62.

Bell, T.B., Landsman, W. and Shackelford, D.A. (2001), “Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: analysis and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 35‐43.

Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, D.R., Neal, T.L. and Riley, R.A. (2002), “Board characteristics and audit fees”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 365‐84.

Casterella, J.R., Francis, J.R., Lewis, B.L. and Walker, P.L. (2004), “Auditor industry specialization, client bargaining power and audit pricing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring, pp. 123‐40.

Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G. and Wright, A.M. (2002), “Corporate governance and the audit process”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 573‐94.

Craswell, A.T., Francis, J.R. and Taylor, S.L. (1995), “Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 297‐322.

Deloitte and Touche (2005), “Feedback on experiences with the implementation of the auditing and reporting requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002”, available at: www.sec.gov/spotlight/soxcomp/soxcomp‐koch.pdf.

Dickins, D.E., Higgs, J. and Skantz, T.R. (2008), “Estimating audit fees post‐SOX”, Current Issues in Auditing, Vol. 2, pp. A9‐A18.

Doyle, J., Ge, W. and McVay, S. (2007), “Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 44, pp. 193‐223.

Felix, W.L., Gramling, A.A. and Malette, M.J. (2001), “The contribution of internal audit as a determinant of external audit fees and factors influencing this contribution”, working paper, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Fields, L.P., Fraser, D.R. and Wilkins, M.S. (2004), “An investigation of the pricing of audit services for financial institutions”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 23, pp. 53‐77.

Financial Executives Institute (FEI) (2005), “Comments of the committee on corporate reporting”, submitted to the SEC Roundtable on implementation of internal control reporting provisions Washington, DC, available at: www.sec.gov/spotlight//soxcomp/soxcomp‐brod.pdf.

Francis, J.R., Reichelt, K. and Wang, D. (2005), “The pricing of national and city‐specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 80 No. 1, pp. 113‐36.

Francis, J.R. and Wang, D. (2005), “Impact of the SEC's public fee disclosure requirement on subsequent period fees and implications for market efficiency”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 24, supplement, pp. 145‐60.

Gul, F.A. and Tsui, J.S.L. (1998), “A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: evidence from audit pricing”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, pp. 219‐37.

Hogan, C.E. and Wilkins, M.S. (2008), “Evidence on the audit risk model: do auditors increase audit fees in the presence of internal control deficiencies?”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 219‐42.

Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U. and Bedard, J.C. (2008), “Internal control quality and audit pricing under the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 105‐26.

Kennedy, P. (2003), A Guide to Econometrics, 5th ed., Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.

Krishnan, J., Rama, D. and Zhang, Y. (2008), “Costs to comply with SOX Section 404”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 169‐86.

Lowensohn, S., Johnson, L.E., Elder, R.J. and Davies, S.P. (2007), “Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 26, pp. 705‐32.

O'Keefe, T.B., Simunic, D.A. and Stein, M.T. (1994), “The production of audit services: evidence from a major public accounting firm”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 241‐61.

Raghunandan, R. and Rama, D.V. (2006), “SOX Section 404 material weakness disclosure and audit fees”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 99‐114.

Reynolds, K. and Francis, J. (2001), “Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office level auditor reporting decisions”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 30, pp. 375‐400.

Simunic, D. (1980), “The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 161‐90.

Simunic, D. and Stein, M.T. (1996), “The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: a review of the economics and the evidence”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 15, Supplement, pp. 119‐34.

AICPA (1983), SAS No. 47, AICPA, New York, NY.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Review of Accounting and Finance

Tập 8 Số 4

369-387

Thông tin tác giả