Personal transformation in multistakeholder environmental partnerships

Policy Sciences - Tập 34 - Trang 273-301 - 2001
Eric C. Poncelet1
1Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, U.S.A

Tóm tắt

This paper examines some of the secondary or indirect consequences of multistakeholder collaborative processes in the environmental arena. Its thesis is that such collaborative processes constitute fertile ground for participating actors to experience change in their subjective understandings of and relationships to each other, themselves, and environmental action. This exposition draws upon ethnographic research performed with a U.S.-based multistakeholder environmental partnership over a two year period in 1997–1998 as well as a theoretical perspective conceptualizing these personal transformations in terms of social learning, cultural production, and identity formation. Three main findings are explored that support the proposed thesis. The first concerns contributions toward personal transformation made by typical partnership structures and operations. The second pertains to the existence of a commonly shared belief among partnership participants demonstrating an expectation for such changes. The third involves evidence that such transformations actually do take place. Examples from the case study include changes to participants’ understandings of other environmental stakeholders, the development of new relationships among participating actors, the adoption of new ways of approaching environmental problem solving and decision making, and the formation of altered identities. The paper explores some of the implications, both positive and negative, that this transformative quality of multistakeholder environmental partnerships has for both environmental problem solving and some of the enduring conflicts that have impeded satisfying environmental action in the past. Finally, recommendations are made for how practitioners may organize, manage, and evaluate multistakeholder partnerships to promote such changes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amy, D. J. (1987). The Politics of Environmental Mediation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Argyris, C. and D. A. Schoön (1996). Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Arrow, H, J. E. McGrath and J. L. Berdahl (2000). Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Atkinson, P. and M. Hammersley (1994). ‘Ethnography and participant observation,’ in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 248–261. Baker, S. (1996). ‘Environmental policy in the European Union: Institutional dilemmas and democratic practice,’ in W.M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft, eds., Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company, pp. 213–233. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays byM.M. Bakhtin, M. Holquist, ed., trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press. Berger, P. and T. Luckman (1967). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Biekart, J.W. (1998). ‘Negotiated agreements in EU environmental policy,’ in J. Golub, ed., New Instruments for Environmental Policy in the EU. London: Routledge, pp. 165–189. Bingham, G. (1986). Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation. Blowers, A. (1998). ‘Power, participation and partnership: The limits of co-operative environmental management,’ in P. Glasbergen, ed., Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 229–250. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Brewer, Marilynn B. and W. Gardner (1996). ‘Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations,’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1): 83–93. Cardskadden, H. and D. J. Lober (1998). ‘Environmental stakeholder management as business strategy: The case of the corporate wildlife habitat enhancement programme,’ Journal of Environmental Management 52: 183–202. Carr, D. S., S.W. Selin and M. Schuett (1998). ‘Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning,’ Environmental Management 22(5): 767–776. Christoff, P. (1996). ‘Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities,’ Environmental Politics 5(3): 476–500. Commission of the European Communities (CEC) (1993). Towards Sustainability: A European Community Programme of Policy and Action in Relation to the Environment and Sustainable Development. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Crowfoot, J. E. and J.M. Wondolleck, eds. (1990). Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: Island Press. Denzin, N.K. (1989). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fiorino, D. J. (1996). ‘Environmental policy and the participation gap,’ in W.M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft, eds., Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company, pp. 194–212. Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. Forester, J. (1996). ‘Beyond dialogue to transformative learning: How deliberative rituals encourage political judgement in community planning processes,’ Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 46: 295–333. Friedman, J. (1987). Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton: Princeton University Press. George, A. L. (1979). ‘Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison,’ in P. G. Lauren, ed., Diplomacy: New Approaches to History, Theory, and Policy. New York: The Free Press, pp. 43–68. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gillette, J. (1995). ‘Toward a practice of learning,’ in J. Gillette and M. McCollom, eds., Groups in Context: A New Perspective on Group Dynamics. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc., pp. 16–33. Glasbergen, P. (1996). ‘Learning to manage the environment,’ in W. M. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft, eds., Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar Publishing Company, pp. 175–193. Glasbergen, P., ed. (1998). Co-operative Environmental Governance: Public-Private Agreements as a Policy Strategy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Glaser, B.G. and A. L. Strauss (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company. Gray, Barbara (1989). Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Green, D. P. and I. Shapiro (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action:Volume I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, trans. T. McCarthy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. T. Burger with F. Lawrence. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hajer, M. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Hannigan, J.A. (1995). Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective. London & NewYork: Routledge. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press. Hogg, M.A. (1996). ‘Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group,’ in E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis, eds., Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, pp. 227–253. Holland, D., W. Lachicotte Jr., D. Skinner and C. Cain (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Holland, D.C. and J. Lave (2001). ‘History in person: Enduring struggles and identities in practice,’ in D. Holland and J. Lave, eds., History in Person: Enduring Struggles and the Practice of Identity. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. Innes, J. E. (1995). ‘Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice,’ Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(3): 183–190. Innes, J. E. (1999). ‘Evaluating consensus building,’ in L. Susskind, S. McKearnan and J. Thomas-Larmer, eds., The Consensus Building Handbook: AComprehensive Guide to Reaching Agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 631–675. Johnson, R. (1987). ‘What is cultural studies anyway?’ Social Text: Theory/Culture/Ideology 16: 38–80. Liefferink, D. and A. P. J. Mol (1998). ‘Voluntary agreements as a form of deregulation? The Dutch experience,’ in U. Collier, ed., Deregulation in the European Union: Environmental Perspectives. London: Routledge, pp. 181–197. Lober, D. J. (1997). ‘Explaining the formation of business-environmentalist collaborations: Collaborative windows and the paper task force,’ Policy Sciences 30: 1–24. Long, F. J. and M. B. Arnold (1995). The Power of Environmental Partnerships. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company. Lynn, F.M. and G. J. Busenberg (1995). ‘Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: What we know, what's left to discover,’ Risk and Analysis 15(2): 147–162. Lynn, F.M., N. Cohen and C. Chess (2000). ‘The chemical industry's community advisory panels: What's been their impact?’ Environmental Science & Technology 34(10): 1881–1886. Maarleveld, M. and C. Dangbégnon (1999). ‘Managing natural resources: A social learning perspective,’ Agriculture and HumanValues 16: 267–280. Maser, C. (1996). Resolving Environmental Conflict:Towards Sustainable Community Development. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press. McCloskey, M. (1996). ‘The limits of collaboration,’ Harper'sMagazine (November 1996), pp. 34–36. Mol, A. P. J. (1996). ‘Ecological modernisation and institutional reflexivity: Environmental reform in the late modern age,’ Environmental Politics 5(2): 302–323. Nader, L. (1995). ‘Civilization and its negotiations,’ in P. Caplan, ed., Understanding Disputes: The Politics of Argument. Oxford: Berg Publishers, pp. 39–64. Polany, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon. Poncelet, E.C. (2001). ‘“A kiss here and a kiss there”: Conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships,’ EnvironmetnalManagement 27(1): 13–26. Poncelet, E.C. (forthcoming). Partnering for the Environment: Multistakeholder Collaboration in a Changing World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Poole, M. S. and R.Y. Hirokawa (1996). ‘Introduction: Communication and group decision making,’ in R.Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole, eds., Communication and Group Decision Making (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 3–18. President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD) (1996). Sustainable America: A New Consensus of Prosperity, Opportunity, and a Healthy Environment. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Price, L. (1987). ‘Ecuadorian illness stories: Cultural knowledge in natural discourse,’ in D. Holland and N. Quinn, eds., Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 313–342. Quinn, N. and D. Holland (1987). ‘Culture and cognition,’ in D. Holland and N. Quinn, eds., CulturalModels in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–40. Rubin, J. Z. (1993). ‘Some wise and mistaken assumptions about conflict and negotiation,’ in J.W. Breslin and J. Z. Rubin, eds., Negotiation Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School, pp. 3–12. Seibold, D. R., R. A. Meyers and Sunwolf (1996). ‘Communication and influence in group decision making,’ in R.Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole, eds., Communication and Group Decision Making (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 242–268. Stafford, E. R. and C. L. Hartman (1996). ‘Green alliances: Strategic relations between businesses and environmental groups,’ Business Horizons 39 (March/April): 50–59. Stake, R. E. (1994). ‘Case studies,’ in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln, eds., Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 236–247. Tonn, B., M. English and C. Travis (2000). ‘A framework for understanding and improving environmental decision making,’ Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 43(2): 163–183. Weidner, H. (1995). ‘Mediation as policy instrument for resolving environmental disputes,’ in B. Dente, ed., Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 159–195. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to Labor: HowWorking Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York: Columbia University Press. Willis, P. (1981). ‘Cultural production is different from cultural reproduction is different from social reproduction is different from reproduction,’ Interchange 12(2-3): 48–67. Woodhill, J. and N. G. Röling (1998). ‘The second wing of the eagle: The human dimension in learning our way to more sustainable futures,’ in N.G. Roöling and M. A. Wagemakers, eds., Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture: Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–72. Yaffee, S. L. et al., eds. (1996). Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience. Washington, DC: Island Press. Yosie, T. F. and T.D. Herbst (1998). ‘Using stakeholder processes in environmental decision making: An evaluation of lessons learned, key issues, and future challenges.’ Tec-Com, Inc. Publishers. Riskworld website, http://www.riskworld.com/Nreports/1998/STAKEHOLD/ HTML/nr98aa07.htm