Personal responsibility for health as a rationing criterion: why we don’t like it and why maybe we should

Journal of Medical Ethics - Tập 34 Số 12 - Trang 871-874 - 2008
Alena Buyx1
1The Harvard Program in Ethics and Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Whether it is fair to use personal responsibility of patients for their own health as a rationing criterion in healthcare is a controversial matter. A host of difficulties are associated with the concept of personal responsibility in the field of medicine. These include, in particular, theoretical considerations of justice and such practical issues as multiple causal factors in medicine and freedom of health behaviour. In the article, personal responsibility is evaluated from the perspective of several theories of justice. It is argued that in a healthcare system based on both equality of opportunity and solidarity, responsible health behaviour can—in principle—be justifiably expected. While the practical problems associated with personal responsibility are important, they do not warrant the common knee-jerk refusal to think more deeply about responsibility for health as a means of allocating healthcare resources. In conclusion, the possibility of introducing personal responsibility as a fair rationing criterion is briefly sketched.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Wikler D . Personal and social responsibility for health. In: Anand S Peter F Sen A , eds. Public health, ethics, and equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005:109–34.

10.1017/S0963180105050218

10.1111/1468-5930.00128

Denier, 2005, On personal responsibility and the human right to healthcare., Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 14, 224, 10.1017/S0963180105050309

Banja, 2004, Obesity, responsibility, and empathy., Case Manager, 15, 43, 10.1016/j.casemgr.2004.09.005

Minkler M . Personal responsibility for health: contexts and controversies. In: Callahan D , ed. Promoting healthy behaviour. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2000:1–22.

10.1056/NEJMp068170

10.1056/NEJMp068141

10.1136/bmj.39387.393160.AD

Engelhardt HT Jr . The foundations of bioethics. 2nd edn. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Callahan D . False hopes. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1998.

10.1086/293126

Arneson RJ . Equality and equal opportunity for welfare. In: Pojman L P Westmoreland R , eds. Equality: selected readings. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997:229–41.

Dworkin R . Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2000.

10.1136/jme.2004.010421

10.1086/233897

Buchanan AE Brock DW Daniels N . From chance to choice: genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Daniels N . Just health. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Rawls J . A theory of justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1971.

10.1007/s00481-005-0398-2

10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00562.x

Segall, 2007, In solidarity with the imprudent: a defense of luck-egalitarianism., Soc Theo Pract, 33, 177, 10.5840/soctheorpract200733224

10.1023/A:1026587031528

10.1093/jmp/17.4.367

10.1023/A:1026551420141

10.1001/jama.1980.03300270038027

10.1177/109019819902600110

Bagaric, 2005, Fat and the law: who should take the blame?, J Law Med, 12, 323

Yoder, 2002, Individual responsibility for health: decision, not discovery., Hastings Cent Rep, 32, 22, 10.2307/3528519

Betancourt, 2007, Personal responsibility versus responsible options: health care, community health promotion, and the battle against chronic disease., Prev Chronic Dis, 4, 1

10.1080/03605310590926858

10.1136/jme.2006.017574

10.1111/j.1748-720X.2007.00114.x

Harris, 1995, Could we hold people responsible for their own adverse health?, J Contemp Health Law Policy, 12, 147

10.1163/092902707X240602

Swedish National Board for Health and Welfare. Priority setting for cardiac care in Sweden. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen, 2004.

Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System. Appropriateness and efficiency. Bonn: The Council, 2001. http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/Startseite/Startseite.htm (accessed 21 October 2008). (Summary in English at http://www.svr-gesundheit.de/Gutachten/Gutacht00/Kurzf-engl00.pdf; accessed 21 October 2008.)

Hyman, 2007, The neurobiology of addiction: implications for voluntary control of behavior., Am J Bioeth, 7, 8, 10.1080/15265160601063969