Person reference and democratization in British English

ARCHER-3.1 = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version 3.1. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013/2016. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of Usage Taken from ARCHER Were Obtained under the Terms of the ARCHER User Agreement. Gale, The Economist Historical Archive 1843–2015. 2013 2013 Atkinson, 2013, Out of the household: master-servant relations and employer liability law, Yale J. Law Humanit., 25, 205 Baker, 2010, Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across four diachronic corpora of British English, Gend. Lang., 4, 125, 10.1558/genl.v4i1.125 Braun, 1998, Terms of address, Vol. 4 Bucholtz, 2005, Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach, Discourse Stud., 7, 585, 10.1177/1461445605054407 Carlson, 2004, Reference, 74 Conboy, 2010 Fairclough, 1992 Farrelly, 2012, Democratization, 392 Fetzer, 2008, ‘Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence.’ The strategic use of pronouns in political interviews, J. Lang. Politics, 7, 271, 10.1075/jlp.7.2.05fet Frank, 2004, Twelve: Britain, the defeat of the 1844 master and servants bill, 402 Garrard, 2002 Hay, 2004, Two: England, 1562–1875. The law and its uses, 59 2004 Hiltunen, 2020, Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century, Lang. Sci, 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270 Howkins, 1992 Hughes, 1988 Humphreys, 2016 Hundt, 2012, “Small is Beautiful”. On the Value of Standard Reference Corpora for Observing Recent Grammatical Change, 175 Keen, 1990, 1348–1500 Keen, 2002 Kilgarriff, 2001, Comparing corpora, Int. J. Corpus Linguist., 6, 97, 10.1075/ijcl.6.1.05kil Kranich, 2020, Changes in the modal domain in different varieties of English as potential effects of democratization, Lang. Sci., 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101271 Laitinen, 2018, Zooming out. Overall frequencies and Google Books, 221 Leech, 2009 Lijffijt, 2016, Significance testing of word frequencies in corpora, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31, 374, 10.1093/llc/fqu064 Mair, 2006 Myhill, 1995, Change and continuity in the functions of American English modals, Linguistics, 33, 157, 10.1515/ling.1995.33.2.157 Nevala, 2009, Altering distance and defining authority: person reference in Late Modern English, J. Hist. Pragmat., 10, 238, 10.1075/jhp.10.2.05nev Nevala, 2019, Two miserable creatures or those atrocious criminals? Evaluative reference in the Mannings murder reporting, 19 Nevalainen, 2013, English historical corpora in transition: from new tools to legacy corpora?, 37 Oakes, 2007, Use of the chi-squared test to examine vocabulary differences in English language corpora representing seven different countries, Lit. Linguistic Comput., 22, 85, 10.1093/llc/fql044 Palander-Collin, 2015, Changing genre conventions and sociocultural change: person-mention in 19th-century English advertisements, 81 Palliser, 1983 Pechenick, 2015, Characterizing the Google Books Corpus: strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolution, PLoS One, 10, 10.1371/journal.pone.0137041 Potts, 2012, Does semantic tagging identify cultural change in British and American English?, Int. J. Corpus Linguist., 17, 295, 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.01pot Schegloff, 2007, Categories in action: person-reference and membership categorization, Discourse Stud., 9, 433, 10.1177/1461445607079162 Scott, 2015 Smith, 2020, Conversationalization and democratization in a radio chat show: a grammar-led investigation, Lang. Sci, 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101269 Vartiainen, 2019 Wierzbicka, 2006 Williams, 1963 Williams, 1976