Persistence of commuting habits: context effects in Germany

The Annals of Regional Science - Trang 1-26 - 2023
Ramona Jost1
1Institute for Employment Research (IAB), Nuremberg, Germany

Tóm tắt

In this study, I investigate the commuting behavior of workers in Germany. Using comprehensive geo-referenced administrative employee and firm data, I can calculate the exact commuting time and the distance between workers’ residence and workplace locations. Based on a behavioral economic approach (Simonson and Tveresky in J Mark Res 29:281–295, 1992), I show that individual commuting decisions are influenced by wages and individual heterogeneity as well as depending on the context individuals observed in the past. In particular, my results show that previously observed commutes have an impact on subsequent commuting behavior: workers choose longer commuting times in the region they recently moved to when the average commute in the region they left was longer. The results indicate that while selectivity and sorting do not influence the effect of the context, the inclusion of individual fixed effects is crucial.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Bettman J, Luce FL, Payne J (1998) Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consumer Res 25:187–217 Bhargava S, Fisman R (2014) Contrast effects in sequential decisions: evidence from speed dating. Rev Econ Stat 96:444–457 Brueckner JK (2000) Urban sprawl: diagnosis and remedies. Int Reg Sci Rev 23:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/016001700761012710 Brueckner JK, Stastna L (2020) Commuting and migration. J Reg Sci 60:853–877. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12498 Brunow S, Gründer M (2013) The impact of activity chaining on the duration of daily activities. Transportation 40:981–1001 Card D, Heining J, Kline P (2013) Workplace heterogeneity and the rise of West German wage inequality. Q J Econ 128:967–1015 Dargay JM, Clark S (2012) The determinants of long distance travel in Great Britain. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 46:576–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.11.016 Dauth W, Haller P (2020) Is there loss aversion in the trade-off between wages and commuting distances? Reg Sci Urban Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103527 Destatis (2017) Commuting in germany: 68% use a car to commute to work. https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/ImFokus/Arbeitsmarkt/PendlerArbeitsweg.html Duan Y, Jost O, Jost R (2022) Beyond lost earnings: the long-term impact of job displacement on workers’ commuting behavior. IAB-Discussion Paper, 15/2022 Frey B, Stutzer A (2007) Commuting and life satisfaction in Germany. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung. Heft 2/3 Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J (2018) Spatial distribution of US employment in an urban efficiency wage setting. J Reg Sci 58:141–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12351 Gimenez-Nadal JI, Molina JA, Velilla J (2020) Trends in commuting time of European workers: a cross-country analysis. IZA Discussion Paper No 12916 Hanson S, Johnston I (1985) Gender differences in work trip lengths: Implications and explanations. Urban Geogr 6:193–219. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.6.3.193 Hartzmark S, Shue K (2017) A tough act to follow: contrast effects in financial markets. NBER Working Paper No. 23883 Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912352 Heuermann D, Assmann F, Freund F, vom Berge P (2016) The distributional effect of commuting subsidies-evidence from geo-referenced data and large-scale policy reform. Reg Sci Urban Econ 67:11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.08.001 Huber S, Rust C (2016) osrmtime: calculate travel time and distance with OpenStreetMap data using the open source routing machine (OSRM). Stand Genomic Sci 16:416–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1601600209 Huber J, John P, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consumer Res 9:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/208899 Kahneman D, Tveresky A (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 4:263–287 Kosfeld R, Werner A (2012) German labour markets—new delineation after the reforms of German district boundaries 2007–2011. Raumforsch Raumordn 70:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-011-0137-8 Lux M, Sunega O (2012) Labor mobility and housing: the impact of housing tenure and housing affordability on labor migration in the Czech Republic. Urban Stud 4:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011405693 McQuaid R, Chen T (2012) Commuting times—the role of gender, children and part-time work. Transp Econ 34:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2011.12.001 Mulalic I, van Ommeren J, Pilegaard N (2014) Wages and commuting: quasi-natural experiments´ evidence from firms that relocate. Econ J 124:1086–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12074 Ostermann K, Eppelsheimer J, Gläser N, Haller P, Oertel M (2022) Geodata in labor market research: trends, potentials and perspective. J Labor Mark Res 56:1–17 Ross SL, Zenou Y (2008) Are shirking and leisure substitutable? An empirical test of efficiency wages based on urban economic theory. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38:498–517 Rouwendal J, Rietveld P (1994) Changes in commuting distances of Dutch households. Urban Studies 31:1545–1557 Ryder H, Heal G (1973) Optimal growth with intertemporally dependent preference. Rev Econ Stud 40:1–33 Shuai X (2012) Does commuting lead to migration? J Reg Anal Policy 42:237–250 Simonsohn U (2006) New Yorkers commute more everywhere: contrast effects in the field. Rev Econ Stat 88:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.2006.88.1.1 Simonsohn U, Loewenstein G (2006) Mistake #37: the effect of previously encountered prices on current housing demand*. Econ J 116:175–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01052.x Simonson I, Tveresky A (1992) Choice in context: tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Mark Res 29:281–295 Tveresky A, Kahneman D (1991) Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Q J Econ 106:1039–1061 Van Ham M, Hooimeijer P (2009) Regional differences in spatial flexibility: long commutes and job related migration intentions in the Netherlands. Appl Spat Anal Policy 2:129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-008-9016-2 Van Ommeren J (2005) Commuting: the contribution of search theory. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 347–380. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0573-8555(2005)0000266013 Van Ommeren J, Fosgerau M (2009) Workers’ marginal costs of commuting. J Urban Econ 65:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.08.001 Van Ommeren J, van den Berg G, Gorter C (2000) Estimating the marginal willingness to pay for commuting. J Reg Sci 40:541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00187 Zabel J (2012) Migration, housing market, and labor market responses to employment shocks. J Urban Econ 72:267–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2012.05.006