Peroxisomal protein import and ERAD: variations on a common theme

McNew, J. A. & Goodman, J. M. An oligomeric protein is imported into peroxisomes in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 127, 1245–1257 (1994).

Glover, J. R., Andrews, D. W. & Rachubinski, R. A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae peroxisomal thiolase is imported as a dimer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 10541–10545 (1994).

Häusler, T., Stierhof, Y. D., Wirtz, E. & Clayton, C. Import of a DHFR Hybrid protein into gycosomes in vivo is not inhibited by the folate-analogue aminopterin. J. Cell Biol. 132, 311–324 (1996).

Brown, L. A. & Baker, A. Shuttles and cycles: transport of proteins into the peroxisome matrix. Mol. Membr. Biol. 25, 363–375 (2008).

Brocard, C. & Hartig, A. Peroxisome targeting signal 1: is it really a simple tripeptide? Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763, 1565–1573 (2006).

Schliebs, W. & Kunau, W. H. PTS2 co-receptors: diverse proteins with common features. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1763, 1605–1612 (2006).

Stanley, W. A. et al. Recognition of a functional peroxisome type 1 target by the dynamic import receptor Pex5p. Mol. Cell 24, 653–663 (2006).

Girzalsky, W., Saffian, D. & Erdmann, R. Peroxisomal protein translocation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1803, 724–731 (2010).

Schnell, D. J. & Hebert, D. N. Protein translocons: multifunctional mediators of protein translocation across membranes. Cell 112, 491–505 (2003).

Erdmann, R. & Schliebs, W. Peroxisomal matrix protein import: the transient pore model. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 738–742 (2005).

Dammai, V. & Subramani, S. The human peroxisomal targeting signal receptor, Pex5p, is translocated into the peroxisomal matrix and recycled to the cytosol. Cell 105, 187–196 (2001).

Ma, C., Schumann, U., Rayapuram, N. & Subramani, S. The peroxisomal matrix import of Pex8p requires only PTS receptors and Pex14p. Mol. Biol. Cell 20, 3680–3689 (2009).

Meinecke, M. et al. The peroxisomal importomer constitutes a large and highly dynamic pore. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 273–277 (2010).

Gouveia, A. M., Reguenga, C., Oliveira, M. E., Sa-Miranda, C. & Azevedo, J. E. Characterization of peroxisomal Pex5p from rat liver: Pex5p in the Pex5p-Pex14p membrane complex is a transmembrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32444–32451 (2000).

Platta, H. W., Grunau, S., Rosenkranz, K., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. Functional role of the AAA peroxins in dislocation of the cycling PTS1 receptor back to the cytosol. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 817–822 (2005).

Miyata, N. & Fujiki, Y. Shuttling mechanism of peroxisome targeting signal type 1 receptor Pex5: ATP-independent import and ATP-dependent export. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 10822–10832 (2005).

Matsumoto, N., Tamura, S. & Fujiki, Y. The pathogenic peroxin Pex26p recruits the Pex1p-Pex6p AAA ATPase complexes to peroxisomes. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 454–460 (2003).

Birschmann, I. et al. Pex15p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae provides a molecular basis for recruitment of the AAA Peroxin Pex6p to peroxisomal membranes. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 2226–2236 (2003).

Platta, H. W. et al. Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p is required for its recycling. J. Cell Biol. 177, 197–204 (2007).

Carvalho, A. F. et al. Ubiquitination of mammalian Pex5p, the peroxisomal import receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 31267–31272 (2007).

Platta, H. W. et al. Pex2 and Pex12 function as protein-ubiquitin ligases in peroxisomal protein import Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 5505–5516 (2009).

Williams, C., van den Berg, M., Geers, E. & Distel, B. Pex10p functions as an E3 ligase for the Ubc4p-dependent ubiquitination of Pex5p. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 374, 620–624 (2008).

Kiel, J. A., Emmrich, K., Meyer, H. E. & Kunau, W. H. Ubiquitination of the PTS1 receptor, Pex5p, suggests the presence of a quality control mechanism during peroxisomal matrix protein import. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 1921–1930 (2005).

Platta, H. W., Girzalsky, W. & Erdmann, R. Ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p. Biochem. J. 384, 37–45 (2004).

Purdue, P. E. & Lazarow, P. B. Pex18p is constitutively degraded during peroxisome biogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47684–47689 (2001).

Leon, S. et al. Dynamics of the peroxisomal import cycle of PpPex20p: ubiquitin-dependent localization and regulation. J. Cell Biol. 172, 67–78 (2006).

Leon, S. & Subramani, S. A conserved cysteine residue of Pichia pastoris Pex20p is essential for its recycling from the peroxisome to the cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 7424–7430 (2007).

Grou, C. P. et al. Members of the E2D (UbcH5) family mediate the ubiquitination of the conserved cysteine of Pex5p, the peroxisomal import receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 14190–14197 (2008).

Grou, C. P. et al. Properties of the ubiquitin-Pex5p thiol ester conjugate. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10504–10513 (2009).

Van den Berg, B. et al. X-ray structure of a protein-conducting channel. Nature 427, 36–44 (2004).

Rapoport, T. A. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nature 450, 663–669 (2007).

Nakatsukasa, K. & Brodsky, J. L. The recognition and retrotranslocation of misfolded proteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Traffic 9, 861–870 (2008).

Gauss, R., Sommer, T. & Jarosch, E. The Hrd1p ligase complex forms a linchpin between ER-lumenal substrate selection and Cdc48p recruitment. EMBO J. 25, 1827–1835 (2006).

Huyer, G. et al. Distinct machinery is required in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of a multispanning membrane protein and a soluble luminal protein. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 38369–38378 (2004).

Vashist, S. & Ng, D. T. Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. J. Cell Biol. 165, 41–52 (2004).

Feldman, M. & van der Goot, F. G. Novel ubiquitin-dependent quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 357–363 (2009).

Hirsch, C., Gauss, R., Horn, S. C., Neuber, O. & Sommer, T. The ubiquitylation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 458, 453–460 (2009).

Kreft, S. G., Wang, L. & Hochstrasser, M. Membrane topology of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum-localized ubiquitin ligase Doa10 and comparison with its human ortholog TEB4 (MARCH-VI). J. Biol. Chem. 281, 4646–4653 (2006).

Sommer, T. & Jentsch, S. A protein translocation defect linked to ubiquitin conjugation at the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 365, 176–179 (1993).

Biederer, T., Volkwein, C. & Sommer, T. Role of Cue1p in ubiquitination and degradation at the ER surface. Science 278, 1806–1809 (1997).

Deak, P. M. & Wolf, D. H. Membrane topology and function of Der3/Hrd1p as a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) involved in endoplasmic reticulum degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10663–10669 (2001).

Gauss, R., Jarosch, E., Sommer, T. & Hirsch, C. A complex of Yos9p and the HRD ligase integrates endoplasmic reticulum quality control into the degradation machinery. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 849–854 (2006).

Lilley, B. N. & Ploegh, H. L. A membrane protein required for dislocation of misfolded proteins from the ER. Nature 429, 834–840 (2004).

Wiertz, E. J. et al. Sec61-mediated transfer of a membrane protein from the endoplasmic reticulum to the proteasome for destruction. Nature 384, 432–438 (1996).

Ploegh, H. L. A lipid-based model for the creation of an escape hatch from the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 448, 435–438 (2007).

Schuberth, C. & Buchberger, A. Membrane-bound Ubx2 recruits Cdc48 to ubiquitin ligases and their substrates to ensure efficient ER-associated protein degradation. Nature Cell Biol. 7, 999–1006 (2005).

Koller, A. et al. Pex22p of Pichia pastoris, essential for peroxisomal matrix protein import, anchors the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, Pex4p, on the peroxisomal membrane. J. Cell. Biol. 146, 99–112 (1999).

Schuberth, C., Richly, H., Rumpf, S. & Buchberger, A. Shp1 and Ubx2 are adaptors of Cdc48 involved in ubiquitin-dependent protein degradation. EMBO Rep. 5, 818–824 (2004).

Kerssen, D. et al. Membrane association of the cycling peroxisome import receptor Pex5p. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 27003–27015 (2006).

Gouveia, A. M., Guimarães, C. P., Oliveira, M. E., Sá- Miranda, C. & Azevedo, J. E. Insertion of Pex5p into the peroxisomal membrane is cargo protein-dependent. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 4389–4392 (2002).

Wanders, R. J. Metabolic and molecular basis of peroxisomal disorders: a review. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 126, 355–375 (2004).

Imai, Y. et al. CHIP is associated with parkin, a gene responsible for familial Parkinson's disease, and enhances its ubiquitin ligase activity. Mol. Cell 10, 55–67 (2002).

Gelman, M. S. & Kopito, R. R. Cystic fibrosis: premature degradation of mutant proteins as a molecular disease mechanism. Methods Mol. Biol. 232, 27–37 (2003).

Kerscher, O., Felberbaum, R. & Hochstrasser, M. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 159–180 (2006).

Raiborg, C. & Stenmark, H. The ESCRT machinery in endosomal sorting of ubiquitylated membrane proteins. Nature 458, 445–452 (2009).

Hanson, P. I. & Whiteheart, S. W. AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 519–529 (2005).

Erzberger, J. P. & Berger, J. M. Evolutionary relationships and structural mechanisms of AAA+ proteins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 35, 95–114 (2006).

Snider, J., Thibault, G. & Houry, W. A. The AAA+ superfamily of functionally diverse proteins. Genome Biol. 9, 216 (2008).