Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: A systematic review

The Breast - Tập 17 - Trang 85-90 - 2008
F.J.H.M. van den Biggelaar1, P.J. Nelemans2, K. Flobbe1
1Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Hospital, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
2Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Tài liệu tham khảo

Friedenberg, 2000, The role of the supertechnologist, Radiology, 215, 630, 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn49630 Brealey, 2005, Accuracy of radiographer plain radiograph reporting in clinical practice: a meta-analysis, Clin Radiol, 60, 232, 10.1016/j.crad.2004.07.012 Pauli, 1996, Radiographers as film readers in screening mammography: an assessment of competence under test and screening conditions, Br J Radiol, 69, 10, 10.1259/0007-1285-69-817-10 Hillman, 1987, Mammogram interpretation by physician assistants, Am J Roentgenol, 149, 907, 10.2214/ajr.149.5.907 Pauli, 1996, Comparison of radiographer/radiologist double film reading with single reading in breast cancer screening, J Med Screen, 3, 18, 10.1177/096914139600300106 Wivell, 2003, Can radiographers read screening mammograms?, Clin Radiol, 58, 63, 10.1053/crad.2002.1087 Glas, 2003, The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance, J Clin Epidemiol, 56, 1129, 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00177-X Bassett, 1995, Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms, Radiology, 194, 189, 10.1148/radiology.194.1.7997550 Haiart, 1991, A comparison of interpretation of screening mammograms by a radiographer, a doctor and a radiologist: results and implications, Br J Clin Pract, 45, 43, 10.1111/j.1742-1241.1991.tb08824.x Luo, 2005, CAD-aided mammogram training, Acad Radiol, 12, 1039, 10.1016/j.acra.2005.04.011 Nodine, 1996, Nature of expertise in searching mammograms for breast masses, Acad Radiol, 3, 1000, 10.1016/S1076-6332(96)80032-8 Nodine, 1999, How experience and training influence mammography expertise, Acad Radiol, 6, 575, 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80252-9 Sumkin, 2003, Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment, Am J Roentgenol, 180, 253, 10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800253 Taylor, 2005, Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography, Health Technol Assess, 9, iii, 10.3310/hta9060 Taylor, 2004, An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers’ interpretation of mammograms, Br J Radiol, 77, 21, 10.1259/bjr/34203805 Tonita, 1999, Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program, Radiology, 211, 529, 10.1148/radiology.211.2.r99ma32529 Balleyguier, 2005, Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist?, Eur J Radiol, 54, 90, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.11.021 Jiang, 1999, Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis, Acad Radiol, 6, 22, 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80058-0 Mello-Thoms, 2003, Perception of breast cancer: eye-position analysis of mammogram interpretation, Acad Radiol, 10, 4, 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80782-1 Mucci, 1997, Radiographers as readers in breast screening: experience with a ‘red dot’ method, Breast, 6, 183, 10.1016/S0960-9776(97)90570-1 Nodine, 2002, Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation, Am J Roentgenol, 179, 917, 10.2214/ajr.179.4.1790917 Rao, 2001, Can breast surgeons read mammograms of symptomatic patients in the one-stop breast clinic?, Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 83, 108 Anderson, 1994, The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening, Clin Radiol, 49, 248, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81850-1 Thurfjell, 1994, benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program, Radiology, 191, 241, 10.1148/radiology.191.1.8134580 Laming, 2000, Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms, J Med Screen, 7, 24, 10.1136/jms.7.1.24 Blanks, 1998, A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme, J Med Screen, 5, 195, 10.1136/jms.5.4.195 Blanks, 1999, Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography, J Med Screen, 6, 152, 10.1136/jms.6.3.152 Mucci, 1999, Double reading of screening mammograms: the use of a third reader to arbitrate on disagreements, Breast, 8, 63, 10.1016/S0960-9776(99)90001-2 Anttinen, 1993, Double reading of mammography screening films—one radiologist or two?, Clin Radiol, 48, 414, 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81111-0 Harvey, 2003, Increase in cancer detection and recall rates with independent double interpretation of screening mammography, Am J Roentgenol, 180, 1461, 10.2214/ajr.180.5.1801461 Duijm, 2004, Independent double reading of screening mammograms in The Netherlands: effect of arbitration following reader disagreements, Radiology, 231, 564, 10.1148/radiol.2312030665 Flobbe, 2001, Diagnostic value of radiological breast imaging in a non-screening population, Int J Cancer, 92, 616, 10.1002/ijc.1235 Flobbe, 2002, The role of ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammography in the detection of breast cancer. A systematic review, Eur J Cancer, 38, 1044, 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00388-4 Flobbe, 2003, The additional diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast cancer, Arch Intern Med, 163, 1194, 10.1001/archinte.163.10.1194