Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review

Journal of Management Control - Tập 28 - Trang 457-502 - 2018
Anja Heinicke1
1c/o Chair of Business Management, esp. Management Accounting and Control, Faculty of Business Management and Economics, Technische Universität Dresden (TU Dresden), Dresden, Germany

Tóm tắt

In view of the increasing sophistication of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their importance for global economies, the purpose of this paper is to provide comprehensive insight into the research on performance measurement systems (PMSs) in SMEs. Thus, a systematic literature review was conducted covering 98 top-tier journals in the areas of management accounting, SMEs, and general management, to structure the existing knowledge. The review of these journals comprises 34 studies that deal with PMSs in SMEs. The paper provides a comprehensive summary of empirical research of use, development and design, influencing factors, and consequences of PMSs in SMEs. In addition, it delineates the particular aspects of family firms. It considers research locations, theories, and methods applied, as well as research settings, and illustrates their changes over time. PMS research in SMEs is still scarce. The review shows that most research has been conducted in Europe and Australia, followed by North America. The majority of papers use the case/field study method. Multiple studies that describe their theoretical roots are informed by contingency theory, organization theory, or psychological/cultural theory. An assessment of the investigated topics illustrates the particularities of PMSs in SMEs, especially in family-controlled firms. Multiple studies highlight the importance of family influence, or continuous revision and knowledge exchange for sophisticated control systems, like PMSs. A lot of papers indicate that SMEs, including family firms, may benefit from the use of sophisticated control systems.

Tài liệu tham khảo

All references marked with * represent papers that are included in the systematic literature review. *Abernethy, M. A., & Lillis, A. M. (1995). The impact of manufacturing flexibility on management control system design. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(4), 241–258. *Aidemark, L.-G., & Funck, E. K. (2009). Measurement and health care management. Financial Accountability and Management, 25(2), 253–276. *Andrews, B. H., Carpenter, J. J., & Gowen, T. L. (2001). A new approach to performance measurement and goal setting. Interfaces, 31(3), 44–54. *Azofra, V., Prieto, B., & Santidrián, A. (2003). The usefulness of a performance measurement system in the daily life of an organisation: A note on a case study. British Accounting Review, 35(4), 367. Bukh, N., & Malmi, T. (2005). Re-examining the cause-and-effect principle of the balanced scorecard. In St Jönsson & J. Mouritsen (Eds.), Accounting in Scandinavia—The northern lights (pp. 87–113). Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press. *Chen, H.-L., & Huang, Y. (2004). The establishment of global marketing strategic alliances by small and medium enterprises. Small Business Economics, 22, 365–377. Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2), 127–168. *Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2013). Performance measurement, modes of evaluation and the development of compromising accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(4), 268–287. *Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Performance measurement and reward systems, trust, and strategic change. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 15, 117–143. Cosenz, F., & Noto, L. (2015). Combining system dynamics modelling and management control systems to support strategic learning processes in SMEs: A dynamic performance management approach. Journal of Management Control, 26, 225–248. *Craig, J., & Moores, K. (2005). Balanced scorecards to drive the strategic planning of family firms. Family Business Review, 18(2), 105–122. *Craig, J., & Moores, K. (2010). Strategically aligning family and business systems using the balanced scorecard. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1, 78–87. Cromie, S., Stephenson, B., & Monteith, D. (1995). The management of family firms: An empirical investigation. International Small Business Journal, 13(4), 11–34. *Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of Balanced Scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 135–153. *Filbeck, G., & Lee, S. (2000). Financial management techniques in family businesses. Family Business Review, 13(3), 201–216. Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., & Bititci, U. S. (2005). Performance measurement systems in SMEs: A review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(1), 25–47. *Ghobadian, A., & O’Regan, N. (2006). The impact of ownership an small firm behaviour and performance. International Small Business Journal, 24(6), 555–586. Ginsberg, A., & Venkatraman, N. (1985). Contingency perspectives of organizational strategy: A critical review of the empirical research. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 421–434. Gimbert, X., Bisbe, J., & Mendoza, X. (2010). The role of performance measurement systems in strategy formulation processes. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 477–497. *Giovannoni, E., & Maraghini, M. P. (2013). The challenges of integrated performance measurement systems. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 26(6), 978–1008. *Giovannoni, E., Maraghini, M. P., & Riccaboni, A. (2011). Transmitting knowledge across generations: The role of management accounting practices. Family Business Review, 24(2), 126–150. *Grafton, J., Lillis, A. M., & Widener, S. K. (2010). The role of performance measurement and evaluation in building organizational capabilities and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 689–706. *Greenhalgh, R. W. (2000). Information and the transnational SME controller. Management Accounting Research, 11(4), 413–426. Günther, T. W. (2013). Conceptualisations of ‘controlling’ in German-speaking countries: Analysis and comparison with Anglo-American management control frameworks. Journal of Management Control, 23, 269–290. Günther, T. W., & Gäbler, S. (2014). Antecedents of the adoption and success of strategic cost management methods: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Business Economics, 84, 145–190. *Gumbus, A., & Lussier, R. N. (2006). Entrepreneurs use a balanced scorecard to translate strategy into performance measures. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(3), 407–425. *Hall, M. (2011). Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers’ mental model development? Management Accounting Research, 22(2), 68–83. Harvey, C., Kelly, A., Morris, H., & Rowlinson, M. (2010). Academic journal quality guide version 4. London: The Association of Business Schools. Harzing, A.-W. (2015). Journal quality list—Fifty-sixth edition 27 November 2015. http://www.harzing.com/download/jql_journal.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2016. Haas, N., & Speckbacher, G. (2017). Everything under my control: CEO characteristics and the evaluation of middle manager performance in small and medium-sized firms. Schmalenbachs Business Review, 18(2), 109–128. Heinicke, A. (2017). Performance measurement systems in small- and medium-sized enterprises. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden. Helfat, C. E. (2007). Stylized facts, empirical research and theory development in management. Strategic Organization, 2(2), 185–192. *Henri, J. (2006a). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 77–103. *Henri, J. (2006b). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529–558. Hiebl, R. W., Duller, C., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Ulrich, P. (2015). Family influence and management accounting usage—Findings from Germany and Austria. Schmalenbach Business Review, 67, 368–404. *Hiebl, R. W., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Duller, C. (2013). The changing role of management accounting in the transition from a family business to a non-family business. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 9(2), 119–154. Hudson, M., Smart, A., & Bourne, M. (2001). Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 21(8), 1096–1115. Hutzschenreuter, T., & Kleindienst, I. (2006). Strategy-process research: What have we learned and what is still to be explored. Journal of Management, 32(5), 673–720. *Ismail, T. H. (2007). Performance evaluation measures in the private sector: Egyptian practice. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5), 503–513. Jiang, L., & Li, X. (2010). Discussions on the improvement of the internal control in SMEs. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(9), 214–216. Kallmuenzer, A., Strobl, A., & Peters, M. (2017). Tweaking the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship in family firms: The effect of control mechanisms and family-related goals. Review of Managerial Science,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0231-6. *Kruis, A., & Widener, S. K. (2014). Managerial influence in performance measurement system design: A recipe for failure? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(2), 1–34. *Lamminmaki, D. (2008). Accounting and the management of outsourcing: An empirical study in the hotel industry. Management Accounting Research, 19(2), 163–181. Lavia López, O., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Management accounting in small and medium-sized enterprises: Current knowledge and avenues for further research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 81–119. *Lee, S. M., Kim, J., Choi, Y., & Lee, S.-G. (2009). Effects of IT knowledge and media selection on operational performance of small firms. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 241–257. Lillis, A. M. (2002). Managing multiple dimensions of manufacturing performance—An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 497–529. *Liu, L., Ratnatunga, J., & Yao, L. J. (2014). Firm characteristics and balanced scorecard usage in Singaporean manufacturing firms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 22(3), 209–222. Lohrke, F. T., Kreiser, P. M., & Weaver, K. M. (2006). The influence of current firm performance on future SME alliance formation intentions: A six-country study. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 19–27. Malina, M. A., Nørreklit, H. S. O., & Selto, F. H. (2007). Relations among measures, climate of control, and performance measurement models. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 935–982. Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 47–90. Malmi, T. (2001). Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 207–220. *Martin, J. H., Martin, B. A., & Minnillo, P. R. (2009). Implementing a market orientation in small manufacturing firms: From cognitive model to action. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(1), 92–115. Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Guthrie, J. (2016). On the shoulders of giants: Undertaking a structured literature review in accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29(5), 767–801. Mitchell, F., & Reid, G. C. (2000). Editorial. Problems, challenges and opportunities: The small business as a setting for management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 11(4), 385–390. *Moores, K., & Mula, J. (2000). The salience of market, bureaucratic, and clan control in the management of family firm transitions: Some tentative Australian evidence. Family Business Review, 13(2), 91–106. *Naro, G., & Travaillé, D. (2011). The role of the balanced scorecard in the formulation and control of strategic processes. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(3), 212–233. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. Neubauer, H., Mayr, S., Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B., & Duller, C. (2012). Management accounting systems and institutionalization in medium-sized and large family businesses—Empirical evidence from Germany and Austria. European Journal of Management, 12(2), 41–60. O’Gorman, C., & Doran, R. (1999). Mission statements in small and medium-sized businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 59–66. Payer-Langthaler, S., Duller, C., & Feldbauer-Durtstmüller, B. (2012). Performance measurement in family firms: Evidence from Austrian medium- and large-sized companies. International Journal of Strategic Management, 12(2), 38–56. Perera, S., & Baker, P. (2007). Performance measurement practices in small and medium size manufacturing enterprises in Australia. Small Enterprise Research, 15(2), 10–30. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5), 473–488. Posch, A., & Speckbacher, G. (2012). Führung in Familienunternehmen: Besonderheiten der Entscheidungsfindung und Verhaltenssteuerung und deren Auswirkung auf den Unternehmenserfolg. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 82(3), 5–23. Prencipe, A., Bar-Yosef, S., & Dekker, H. C. (2014). Accounting research in family firms: Theoretical and empirical challenges. European Accounting Review, 23(3), 361–385. Salvato, C., & Moores, K. (2010). Research on accounting in family firms: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Family Business Review, 23(3), 193–215. *Sandhu, R., Baxter, J., & Emsley, D. (2008). The balanced scorecard and its possibilities: The initial experiences of a Singaporean firm. Australian Accounting Review, 18(44), 16–24. Scapens, R. W., & Bromwich, M. (2001). Management accounting research: The first decade. Management Accounting Research, 12(2), 245–254. Schachner, M., Speckbacher, G., & Wentges, P. (2006). Steuerung mittelständischer Unternehmen: Größeneffekte und Einfluss der Eigentums- und Führungsstruktur. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 76(6), 589–614. Scheiber, F., Wruk, D., Huppertz, S., Oberg, A., & Woywode, M. (2012). Die Verbreitung moderner Managementkonzepte im Mittelstand. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 82(3), 25–69. Senftlechner, D., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Management accounting and management control in family businesses. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 11(4), 573–606. Shields, M. D. (1997). Research in management accounting by North Americans in the 1990s. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 3–61. Songini, L., Gnan, L., & Malmi, T. (2013). The role and impact of accounting in family business. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4(2), 71–83. *Speckbacher, G., & Wentges, P. (2012). The impact of family control on the use of performance measures in strategic target setting and incentive compensation: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 23(1), 34–46. *Stergiou, K., Ashraf, J., & Uddin, S. (2013). The role of structure and agency in management accounting control change of a family owned firm: A Greek case study. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(1), 62–73. Tambunan, T. (2005). Promoting small and medium enterprises with c clustering approach: A policy experience from Indonesia. Journal of Small and Medium Business Management, 43(2), 138–154. Thaker, K. (2011). How does business performance measurement perform? An empirical study with reference to leading companies in India. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 12(4), 396–416. Tranfield, D., Denver, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. Tuomela, T. (2005). The interplay of different levers of control: A case study of introducing a new performance measurement system. Management Accounting Research, 16(3), 293–320. Vachani, S. (2005). Problems of foreign subsidiaries of SMEs compared with large companies. International Business Review, 14(4), 415–439. Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 757–788. *Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708–736. *Wouters, M., & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4), 488–516.