Chung L, Nixon BA, Yu E (1996) Dealing with change: an approach using non-functional requirements. Requir Eng 1:238–260
Balsamo S, Di Marco A, Inverardi P, Simeoni M (2004) Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 30:295–310
Happe J, Becker S, Rathfelder C, Friedrich H, Reussner RH (2010) Parametric performance completions for model-driven performance prediction. Perform Eval 67:694–716
Cortellessa V, Marco AD, Inverardi P (2011) Model-based software performance analysis. Springer, Berlin
Koziolek H (2010) Performance evaluation of component-based software systems: a survey. Perform Eval 67:634–658
Arcelli D, Di Pompeo D (2017) Applying design patterns to remove software performance antipatterns: a preliminary approach. Proc Comput Sci 109:521–528
De Sanctis M, Trubiani C, Cortellessa V, Di Marco A, Flamminj M (2017) A model-driven approach to catch performance antipatterns in ADL specifications. Inf Softw Technol 83:35–54
Shoaib Y, Das O (2011) Web application performance modeling using layered queueing networks. Electron Notes Theor Comput Sci 275:123–142
Spivey JM (1992) The Z notation: a reference manual. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Model driven Architecture Specification (2006) Object Management Group. http://www.omg.org/mda/specs.htm
Saaltink M (1997) The Z/EVES system. In: Bowen JP, Hinchey MG, Till D (eds) ZUM '97: the Z formal specification notation, vol 1212. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 72–85
Petriu D, Alhaj M, Tawhid R (2012) Software performance modeling. In: Formal methods for model-driven engineering, pp 219–262
Nooraei Abadeh M, Mirian-Hosseinabadi SH (2015) Delta-based regression testing: a formal framework towards model-driven regression testing. J Softw Evol Process 27:913–952
Meta Object Facility Final Adopted Specification (2008) Object Management Group 2.0 query/view/transformation specification
Arendt T, Taentzer G (2013) A tool environment for quality assurance based on the Eclipse Modeling Framework. Autom Softw Eng 20:141–184
Arcelli D, Cortellessa V, Di Pompeo D (2017) Performance-driven software model refactoring. Inf Softw Technol 95:366–397
Heckel R, Küster JM, Taentzer G (2002) Confluence of typed attributed graph transformation systems. In: ICGT, pp 161–176
Czyzowicz J, Fraczak W, Yazdani M (2008) Computing the throughput of concatenation state machines. J Discret Algorithms 6:28–36
Woodcock J, Davies J (1996) Using Z: specification, refinement, and proof, vol 39. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Yu E (2011) Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering. Soc Model Requir Eng 11:2011
Yu ES (1997) Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering, pp 226–235
Rolland C, Souveyet C, Achour CB (1998) Guiding goal modeling using scenarios. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 24:1055–1071
Van Lamsweerde A (2001) Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international symposium on requirements engineering. pp 249–262
Khlif I, Kacem MH, Kallel M, Drira K, Kacem AH (2017) Model consistency for multi-scale architectures applied to smart systems. Proc Comput Sci 109:400–407
Di Marco V, Inverardi P (2011) Model-based software performance analysis. Springer, Berlin
Franks G, Al-Omari T, Woodside M, Das O, Derisavi S (2009) Enhanced modeling and solution of layered queueing networks. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 35:148–161
Balsamo S, Marzolla M (2003) Simulation modeling of UML software architectures. In: Proceedings of the European simulation multiconference, Nottingham, 9–11 June 2003
Bernardi S, Donatelli S, Merseguer J (2002) From UML sequence diagrams and statecharts to analysable petri net models. In: proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on software and performance, pp 35–45
Bernardi S, Merseguer J (2007) Performance evaluation of UML design with Stochastic Well-formed Nets. J Syst Softw 80:1843–1865
Cortellessa V, Mirandola R (2000) Deriving a queueing network based performance model from UML diagrams. In Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Software and performance, pp 58–70
Tribastone M, Gilmore S Automatic translation of UML sequence diagrams into PEPA models. In: 5th International conference on quantitative evaluation of systems. QEST’08, pp 205–214
Becker S, Koziolek H, Reussner R (2009) The Palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. J Syst Softw 82:3–22
Distefano S, Scarpa M, Puliafito A (2011) From UML to Petri nets: the PCM-based methodology. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 37:65–79
Canevet C, Gilmore S, Hillston J, Kloul L, Stevens P (2004) Analysing UML 2.0 activity diagrams in the software performance engineering process. ACM SIGSOFT Softw Eng Notes 29:74–78
Grassi V, Mirandola R, Randazzo E, Sabetta A (2008) Klaper: an intermediate language for model-driven predictive analysis of performance and reliability. In: The common component modeling example. Springer, pp 327–356
Grassi V, Mirandola R, Sabetta A (2005) From design to analysis models: a kernel language for performance and reliability analysis of component-based systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pp 25–36
Petriu D, Woodside M (2004) A metamodel for generating performance models from UML designs. In: The Unified Modeling Language. Modelling Languages and Applications, pp 41–53
Woodside M, Petriu DC, Petriu DB, Shen H, Israr T, Merseguer J (2005) Performance by unified model analysis (PUMA). In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Software and performance, pp 1–12
Smith CU, Williams LG (1999) A performance model interchange format. J Syst Softw 49:63–80
Smith CU, Lladó CM, Puigjaner R (2010) Performance Model Interchange Format (PMIF 2): a comprehensive approach to queueing network model interoperability. Perform Eval 67:548–568
Cortellessa V, Di Gregorio S, Di Marco A (2008) Using ATL for transformations in software performance engineering: a step ahead of java-based transformations? In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on Software and performance, pp 127–132
UML Profile for MARTE Specification (2011) Object Management Group. https://www.omg.org/spec/MARTE/About-MARTE/
Espinoza H, Dubois H, Gérard S, Medina J, Petriu DC, Woodside M (2005) Annotating UML models with non-functional properties for quantitative analysis. In: International conference on model driven engineering languages and systems, pp 79–90
Xu J (2012) Rule-based automatic software performance diagnosis and improvement. Perform Eval 69:525–550
Diaz-Pace A, Kim H, Bass L, Bianco P, Bachmann F (2008) Integrating quality-attribute reasoning frameworks in the ArchE design assistant. In: International conference on the quality of software architectures, pp 171–188
Mahmoud A, Niu N (2014) Supporting requirements to code traceability through refactoring. Requir Eng 19:309–329
Cleland-Huang J, Chang CK, Wise JC (2003) Automating performance-related impact analysis through event based traceability. Requir Eng 8:171–182
Moreno G, Merson P (2008) Model-driven performance analysis. In: Quality of software architectures. Models and architectures, pp 135–151
Kolovos D, Rose L, Garcia-Dominguez A, Paige R (2012) The epsilon book (2010)